Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 19 Mar 2014 (Wednesday) 03:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What am I missing? (Shooting the moon)

 
VaiFanatic
Member
Avatar
97 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2012
Location: San Antonio, Texas
     
Mar 19, 2014 03:25 |  #1

I'm using my EF 400mm f/5.6 lens with my 2x Extender to shoot photos of the moon.

The end result is that I'm still ending up with blurry photos. I know it's not out of focus, or that the extender is reducing clarity, because the LiveView display is absolutely crisp and clear!! In fact, I see more detail in the LiveView than any photo I've managed to take.

Is there some sort of method of calculating the proper field-of-view and then judging the shutter speed based on that?

I'm using my manfrotto tripod (I need suggestions for a better one, adjusting this thing to follow the moon and planets is such a chore) and my RC-6 remote, so the only thing that can be shaking the camera would be the mirror (I make sure it's not windy). I've enabled my mirror lock, but it doesn't seem to actually function when I follow the steps of locking the mirror before taking the photo.

This is the clearest I could get last night with an aperture of f/14 and a shutter speed of 1/100. The only post processing I did, was simply turn the raw file into a .png after adding a high pass filter over it with an overlayed duplicate layer (still learning this post processing stuff):

IMAGE: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2850/13236562525_798b35ff37_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …83315202@N03/13​236562525/  (external link)

I'm almost certain my equipment is up to the task to take some clear photos (it won't match a telescope, I understand that), at least clearer than what I've managed. The only bad variable could be me as the photographer.

Canon EOS 60D | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM | Canon EF 2x III Extender | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (nifty fifty) | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STF (sporty forty) | Canon EFS 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 | MD-EOS Adapter | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50mm f/1.4 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 28mm f/2.8 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 135mm f/3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr_Bester
Member
111 posts
Joined Dec 2007
     
Mar 19, 2014 10:11 |  #2

You could try opening up the ƒ stop, you could be seeing the beginning of refraction. When I've shot it, I'm usually around 1/640 @ ƒ8 ISO 400.


gear: 50d, siggy 10-20, siggy 24-70 f/2.8, canon 70-200 f/4L, Canon 400 f/5.6L
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/20938394@N03/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neacail
Goldmember
Avatar
1,188 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Likes: 441
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
     
Mar 19, 2014 10:28 |  #3

That's with the high pass? What did you have the high pass set to?

I think you could be shooting too slow. I'd take shutter speed up to at least 1/250.

Do you have the tripod set up on solid ground? I find that if I set mine up on my back deck (which is wood), I can't stand on the deck. Even if I'm standing there not moving the camera shakes.


Shelley
Image Editing Okay

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VaiFanatic
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
97 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2012
Location: San Antonio, Texas
     
Mar 19, 2014 12:35 |  #4

Mr_Bester wrote in post #16770097 (external link)
You could try opening up the ƒ stop, you could be seeing the beginning of refraction. When I've shot it, I'm usually around 1/640 @ ƒ8 ISO 400.

I'll give that a shot tonight. EDIT: I just thought of something, with the extender on, the widest I can set my aperture is f/11. I'll try it without the extender which will allow me to open up to f/5.6

neacail wrote in post #16770145 (external link)
That's with the high pass? What did you have the high pass set to?

I think you could be shooting too slow. I'd take shutter speed up to at least 1/250.

Do you have the tripod set up on solid ground? I find that if I set mine up on my back deck (which is wood), I can't stand on the deck. Even if I'm standing there not moving the camera shakes.

I set the high pass to about 4 pixels. It brought out the most detail, without looking too off.

I'll increase the shutter speed as well.

My tripod sits on flagstone ground or my driveway, depending on whether or not I'm in my front of back yard.

The camera strap doesn't swap or anything, so that couldn't be the culprit if it's a motion thing.


Canon EOS 60D | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM | Canon EF 2x III Extender | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (nifty fifty) | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STF (sporty forty) | Canon EFS 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 | MD-EOS Adapter | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50mm f/1.4 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 28mm f/2.8 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 135mm f/3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Mar 19, 2014 19:35 |  #5

VaiFanatic wrote in post #16769483 (external link)
I've enabled my mirror lock, but it doesn't seem to actually function when I follow the steps of locking the mirror before taking the photo.

It should. I think you need to explore what's going on here. Remember, the first shutter release activation locks up the mirror; the second one actually makes the exposure, unless it's different with an RC-6 of course.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Mar 19, 2014 21:26 |  #6

Heya,

Faster shutter. 1/100 is slow for a fast moving moon, in regards to your angle of view (focal length related). The longer that focal length is, the faster you'll want the shutter on a moving object.

Your lens is sharp at F5.6. It's not much sharper at F14. No need to stop down. Try F8 and stay there. Adjust ISO for exposure based on shutter speed once you figure what you want. I would try to get closer to 1/400 or 1/500, and then add ISO within your acceptable noise limits.

Also, the full moon is not the best thing to look at for sharpness. I find full moons look less sharp, no matter who took the photo, than non-full moons. There's just better contrast on the non-full moons. Easier to focus on them. Thus, sharper to me at least.

Everything in the LCD liveview will look sharper than the LCD of your computer monitor. Pixel density.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VaiFanatic
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
97 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2012
Location: San Antonio, Texas
     
Mar 19, 2014 22:47 |  #7

xarqi wrote in post #16771379 (external link)
It should. I think you need to explore what's going on here. Remember, the first shutter release activation locks up the mirror; the second one actually makes the exposure, unless it's different with an RC-6 of course.

I tried doing the 2-second delay drive and using the shutter button and still no luck. I'll fiddle with it some more tonight, if it's not cloudy.

MalVeauX wrote in post #16771604 (external link)
Heya,

Faster shutter. 1/100 is slow for a fast moving moon, in regards to your angle of view (focal length related). The longer that focal length is, the faster you'll want the shutter on a moving object.

Your lens is sharp at F5.6. It's not much sharper at F14. No need to stop down. Try F8 and stay there. Adjust ISO for exposure based on shutter speed once you figure what you want. I would try to get closer to 1/400 or 1/500, and then add ISO within your acceptable noise limits.

Also, the full moon is not the best thing to look at for sharpness. I find full moons look less sharp, no matter who took the photo, than non-full moons. There's just better contrast on the non-full moons. Easier to focus on them. Thus, sharper to me at least.

Everything in the LCD liveview will look sharper than the LCD of your computer monitor. Pixel density.

Very best,

You know, I'm inclined to agree about full moons and sharpness (though folks with really nice telescopes can get some amazing photos), it seems a waxing or waning moon always comes out clearer.

I'll play around with f/8 tonight without the extender on at 400mm focal length and see what results I get. I'll definitely up the shutter speed.

That LiveView does a great job of fooling me :cry:

At lower resolutions, the photos actually look good, but I'd love to be able to take full-size photos and just have the detail be so amazing, it melts your face off :shock:

I guess that's where a telescope will come in, in the future.


Canon EOS 60D | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM | Canon EF 2x III Extender | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (nifty fifty) | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STF (sporty forty) | Canon EFS 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 | MD-EOS Adapter | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50mm f/1.4 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 28mm f/2.8 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 135mm f/3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
xarqi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,435 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Aotearoa/New Zealand
     
Mar 20, 2014 01:30 |  #8

VaiFanatic wrote in post #16771739 (external link)
I tried doing the 2-second delay drive and using the shutter button and still no luck. I'll fiddle with it some more tonight, if it's not cloudy.

Or even if it is. You should be able to sort out the mirror lock up / remote operation at any time, so why not do it without eating into your "sky" time.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VaiFanatic
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
97 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2012
Location: San Antonio, Texas
     
Mar 20, 2014 11:42 |  #9

xarqi wrote in post #16771975 (external link)
Or even if it is. You should be able to sort out the mirror lock up / remote operation at any time, so why not do it without eating into your "sky" time.

I was doing work-related things so no chance to try and sort that out.

It was a little too cloudy to shoot last night, so I'll see what the deal is with the mirror lock-up once I return from the hardware store.


Canon EOS 60D | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM | Canon EF 2x III Extender | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (nifty fifty) | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STF (sporty forty) | Canon EFS 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 | MD-EOS Adapter | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50mm f/1.4 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 28mm f/2.8 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 135mm f/3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SimonClarkson
Member
149 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2012
Location: Horsham UK
     
Mar 22, 2014 04:23 |  #10

I know this may seem obvious but is the IS switched off on your lens??




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nighthound
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,675 posts
Gallery: 224 photos
Best ofs: 24
Likes: 4526
Joined Aug 2007
     
Mar 22, 2014 08:40 |  #11

I'd say that's pretty outstanding for the 400 and the 2x TC. Keep in mind atmospheric conditions and the position of the Moon at the time of imaging. The lower in the sky it is the more atmosphere you're shooting through. Even when the Moon is high atmospheric conditions may not be ideal. On unsettled nights there can be periods of clarity, sometimes it can be just a matter of waiting an hour or two and sometimes luck is a factor so shooting more than needed can hit the more settled periods. During the hot months or times when the days are warm and nights are cool the radiational cooling can last well after dark. I've taken my best Lunar shots between midnight and sunrise, especially when shooting from residential areas where concrete and rooftops compound poor seeing/imaging conditions. My experience has been at very high magnifications which really helps with appreciating how much atmospheric conditions affect image quality. An unstable atmosphere can make images appear slightly out of focus even when you know your focus is dead on.

You have "Image Editing Ok" turned on so I did a bit of selective sharping in the center of the shot and raise contrast a bit as well:

IMAGE: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Nighthd/Astrophotography/test/tst2/13236562525_798b35ff37_b_nh.jpg~original

This is one of mine taken with a telescope, I'd say yours is very close to this in sharpness.
http://i3.photobucket.​com …llery/flmn-1.jpg~original (external link)

Steve
Canon Gear: 1D Mark IV | 1D Mark II | 5D | 20D | 500L IS (f/4) | 100-400L
SteveEllwoodPhotograph​y.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VaiFanatic
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
97 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2012
Location: San Antonio, Texas
     
Mar 23, 2014 00:48 |  #12

SimonClarkson wrote in post #16776908 (external link)
I know this may seem obvious but is the IS switched off on your lens??

This lens does not have IS.

Nighthound wrote in post #16777141 (external link)
I'd say that's pretty outstanding for the 400 and the 2x TC. Keep in mind atmospheric conditions and the position of the Moon at the time of imaging. The lower in the sky it is the more atmosphere you're shooting through. Even when the Moon is high atmospheric conditions may not be ideal. On unsettled nights there can be periods of clarity, sometimes it can be just a matter of waiting an hour or two and sometimes luck is a factor so shooting more than needed can hit the more settled periods. During the hot months or times when the days are warm and nights are cool the radiational cooling can last well after dark. I've taken my best Lunar shots between midnight and sunrise, especially when shooting from residential areas where concrete and rooftops compound poor seeing/imaging conditions. My experience has been at very high magnifications which really helps with appreciating how much atmospheric conditions affect image quality. An unstable atmosphere can make images appear slightly out of focus even when you know your focus is dead on.

You have "Image Editing Ok" turned on so I did a bit of selective sharping in the center of the shot and raise contrast a bit as well:
QUOTED IMAGE

This is one of mine taken with a telescope, I'd say yours is very close to this in sharpness.
http://i3.photobucket.​com …llery/flmn-1.jpg~original (external link)

Yeah, I usually way for it to be much higher in the sky, I haven't been able to do much over the last few days because it was cloudy and rainy. Perhaps tonight I can get a chance.

And wow, you're right, I'll work on my editing skills as well. Thanks!


Canon EOS 60D | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM | Canon EF 2x III Extender | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (nifty fifty) | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STF (sporty forty) | Canon EFS 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 | MD-EOS Adapter | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50mm f/1.4 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 28mm f/2.8 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 135mm f/3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
I was hit more than 15 times
Avatar
15,584 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Likes: 8192
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Mar 23, 2014 01:30 as a reply to  @ VaiFanatic's post |  #13

I think you have a very good photo of the moon. As others have said it may be atmospheric conditions affecting your outcome.

Just to be sure let me make sure you have the correct settings on your 60D for Mirror Lock Up. I also own the 60D

Page 257 of your manual
Custom Function Group IV (next to Registering My Menu (Favorites))
In Group IV find:
Custom Function III:Autofocus/Drive
- - - - change this setting (Mirror Lock up) to Enable


Press your shutter (or RC-6 Remote) once to raise the mirror, then again to take the picture. You always need to press the shutter 2 times to take the picture.

When done taking pictures then remember to change this setting back to Disable which I have been known to forget!


Charles
Canon EOS 90D * Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM* Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM Contemporary
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
VaiFanatic
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
97 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2012
Location: San Antonio, Texas
     
Mar 29, 2014 20:42 |  #14

Inspeqtor wrote in post #16778846 (external link)
I think you have a very good photo of the moon. As others have said it may be atmospheric conditions affecting your outcome.

Just to be sure let me make sure you have the correct settings on your 60D for Mirror Lock Up. I also own the 60D

Page 257 of your manual
Custom Function Group IV (next to Registering My Menu (Favorites))
In Group IV find:
Custom Function III:Autofocus/Drive
- - - - change this setting (Mirror Lock up) to Enable


Press your shutter (or RC-6 Remote) once to raise the mirror, then again to take the picture. You always need to press the shutter 2 times to take the picture.

When done taking pictures then remember to change this setting back to Disable which I have been known to forget!

Charles,

Thanks!! I really appreciate the positive feedback from you guys. I'm also think there were thin, high altitude clouds as well, as recent nights have been super crystal clear compared to the nights I took those photos.

I've neglected to look into my mirror lock-up because I've gotten overwhelmed and distracted by other things, but I'm certain I'll sort it out, and I'm sure that will help!


Canon EOS 60D | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM | Canon EF 2x III Extender | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II (nifty fifty) | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STF (sporty forty) | Canon EFS 18-200mm f/3.5-5.6 | MD-EOS Adapter | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 50mm f/1.4 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 28mm f/2.8 | Minolta MD Rokkor-X 135mm f/3.5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Inspeqtor
I was hit more than 15 times
Avatar
15,584 posts
Gallery: 151 photos
Likes: 8192
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Northern Indiana
     
Mar 30, 2014 00:55 |  #15

VaiFanatic wrote in post #16795868 (external link)
Charles,

Thanks!! I really appreciate the positive feedback from you guys. I'm also think there were thin, high altitude clouds as well, as recent nights have been super crystal clear compared to the nights I took those photos.

I've neglected to look into my mirror lock-up because I've gotten overwhelmed and distracted by other things, but I'm certain I'll sort it out, and I'm sure that will help!

You are most welcome. :)


Charles
Canon EOS 90D * Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM* Flickr Account (external link)
Tokina AT-X Pro DX 11-20 f/2.8 * Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 DC Macro OS * Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 APO DG OS HSM Contemporary
Canon 18-55 IS Kit Lens * Canon 70-300 IS USM * Canon 50mm f1.8 * Canon 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,012 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
What am I missing? (Shooting the moon)
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
1044 guests, 168 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.