Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 21 Mar 2014 (Friday) 18:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

50mm 1.2 focus off 10ft, and on-the-money. Had similar?

 
mdvaden
Goldmember
Avatar
3,482 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Likes: 1812
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Medford, Oregon
     
Mar 21, 2014 18:43 |  #1

Just got around to putting my new 50mm 1.2 to use. I focused on a redwood tree and wondered why it looked like the matter in focus ended up being needles on the ground 10 ft. closer to me than the tree. Took the lens to Pro Photo, and trying it on a 5D Mk iii, the guy there said he didn't find anything awkward just from a few test photos. He suggested putting my card in my 5D Mk ii, enabling the AF point display. I did that, and it was the center point as suspected, which means flipped to AF, the shot was 10 feet front focused. But with a few test shots yesterday, I also got accurate AF in my office at stuff on the wall, then then a couple feet front focus outside shooting at moss on cedar fence.

With virtually every other lens in my signature, AF works fine for me. It's only this 50mm 1.2 where I'm seeing this issue. Anyone every experienced similar?

A lens repair place the camera shop recommended, suggested sending the lens to Canon when I described what was or was not happening with both lens and camera.

I've had a couple of lenses before which were off some on focus, but nothing quite like this. Had the AF focus point indicator told me, for example on the one, that I used a focus point to the far left, i would have though operator error. But the center point and trunk should have had nothing close, not even a spider web dangling in the way.


vadenphotography.com (external link) . . . and . . . Coast Redwoods Main Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdvaden
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,482 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Likes: 1812
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Medford, Oregon
     
Mar 21, 2014 18:59 |  #2

Here's a sample ..

The green arrow is where the focus point is. The red arrows by the foliage left and path below are what's in focus. The trunk is about 11 feet wide.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/03/3/LQ_680428.jpg
Image hosted by forum (680428) © mdvaden [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

vadenphotography.com (external link) . . . and . . . Coast Redwoods Main Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
neimad19
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Mar 2012
     
Mar 21, 2014 20:10 |  #3

Like suggested to you already, send it to Canon with everything you've told/shown us and hope it doesnt cost an arm & leg.

Not sure if it's a coincidence or not but I've had nothing but trouble with 2 different 50 1.8's and currently my new 50 1.4. I Wouldn't be surprised if the 1.2 holds up to the tainted 50mm family name.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 620
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Mar 21, 2014 20:16 |  #4

I had an interesting route to getting my 50L

The first one I got was massively defective. It was like every shot seemed to have Vaseline smeared over the lens or something.

Returned it for another, which had a massive focus problem like you see here.

For a while I gave up and used a 50/1.4 which is a lens that kind of bothers me day to day because it has awful bokeh and it has awful focus performance in low light.

So finally I got a third 50L, which I love. My current lens is sharp and focusses with no issues.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mdvaden
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,482 posts
Gallery: 95 photos
Likes: 1812
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Medford, Oregon
     
Mar 21, 2014 23:38 |  #5

JeffreyG wrote in post #16776351 (external link)
I had an interesting route to getting my 50L

The first one I got was massively defective. It was like every shot seemed to have Vaseline smeared over the lens or something.

Returned it for another, which had a massive focus problem like you see here.

For a while I gave up and used a 50/1.4 which is a lens that kind of bothers me day to day because it has awful bokeh and it has awful focus performance in low light.

So finally I got a third 50L, which I love. My current lens is sharp and focusses with no issues.


Interesting feedback so far.

Maybe that's why the camera shop guy said issues like I'm experiencing are more common than I might realize. Although he implied hope when he suggested sending the lens in.

Mine is still well within the warranty period. I got it around last November, and really didn't put it to use until just a few weeks ago.


vadenphotography.com (external link) . . . and . . . Coast Redwoods Main Page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
melcat
Goldmember
1,122 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Mar 22, 2014 01:47 |  #6

mdvaden wrote in post #16776722 (external link)
Interesting feedback so far. Maybe that's why ...

You did ask if anyone else had had problems, so it's not surprising you got such a response. All the people like me who have not had problems didn't post.

First try microadjusting the lens for distances like in your forest shot. If it can't be done within the range of the camera, the lens is faulty. Mine is sharp and has accurate focus at that distance. (I have an older model camera.)

As for your office tests and the test in the shop, you didn't say what f stop you tested it at. Ensure when you test that close your aperture is at f/1.2. Otherwise the known, designed-in, focus shift at close distances could cancel out the front focus on your copy. That's why I said to microadjust at longer distances.

Leaving aside any other tests when the lens behaves properly, the fact remains if it cannot be microadjusted to focus correctly for a subject like your tree above, the lens is faulty.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,371 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
50mm 1.2 focus off 10ft, and on-the-money. Had similar?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2269 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.