Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 21 Mar 2014 (Friday) 22:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Adding a vignette yes or no?

 
Paul ­ Mac
Member
193 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Ga, USA
     
Mar 21, 2014 22:46 |  #1

I have been watching a bunch of YouTube tutorial videos on Lightroom 5 and in one series in particular, the photographer (Anthony Morganti) likes to use a vignette on his photos. I've played around with it some and I can't decide whether I like it or not. What are your thoughts and feelings about adding a vignette on a photo? I'm not talking about circa 1988 glamour shots white border vignetting either, just a subtle black border. I am going to include two sample images I took yesterday where one has a vignette and the other one doesn't to help compare.

No vignette:

IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c354/czshooter/Canon%20S120/IMG_0240_zpsd1a149e3.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s31.photobucket​.com …0240_zpsd1a149e​3.jpg.html  (external link)


IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c354/czshooter/Canon%20S120/IMG_0279-2_zpsfb5d7ec3.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s31.photobucket​.com …79-2_zpsfb5d7ec3.jpg.html  (external link)


With vignettes:

IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c354/czshooter/Canon%20S120/IMG_0240-2_zps1a54b529.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s31.photobucket​.com …40-2_zps1a54b529.jpg.html  (external link)


IMAGE: http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c354/czshooter/Canon%20S120/IMG_0279_zps065eda7a.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s31.photobucket​.com …0279_zps065eda7​a.jpg.html  (external link)


So what do you guys think about vignetting your photos?

SX40HS & S120

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Mar 21, 2014 23:03 |  #2

I dont see either of these two shots benefitting from the vignette. its a useful and sometimes beneficial technique but also way overused.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
venom3300
Senior Member
610 posts
Likes: 145
Joined Jan 2014
     
Mar 21, 2014 23:12 |  #3

lens manufacturers spent years correcting lenses to no vignette. Now everyone uses software to add it back. I don't get it...


Bodies: Nikon D800,Canon Rebel GII, Pentax K1000
Lenses: Nikon 20mm 1.8, Nikon 24 2.8 MF, Tamron SP 35mm 1.8, Tamron 90 2.8 Macro, Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR I, Nikon AI-P 500mm F4, Nikon TC-16A, SMC Pentax-A 50/1.7, SMC Pentax-M 100/4 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Easy ­ Money
Member
60 posts
Joined Feb 2014
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
     
Mar 21, 2014 23:58 |  #4

I just don't see any benefit to adding a vignette, it wouldn't really do anything to make the photos any better.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brain ­ Mechanic
Goldmember
Avatar
3,526 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Apr 2010
     
Mar 22, 2014 00:40 |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

I don't like them much but in some occasions they seem to work from an artistic point of view but only in a select few.


Gear: a toothed wheel :p
"To be of good quality, you have to excuse yourself from the presence of shallow and callow minded individuals" Michael Bassey Johnson
--Oscar--
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Paul ­ Mac
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
193 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Ga, USA
     
Mar 22, 2014 01:29 |  #6

Thanks for the responses guys.


SX40HS & S120

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drmaxx
Goldmember
1,281 posts
Gallery: 41 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Jul 2010
     
Mar 22, 2014 04:20 as a reply to  @ Paul Mac's post |  #7

I do use vignetting to emphasize the subject - mostly in candid pictures of people.
The water tower with vignetting does look more interesting and breaks up the flat blue sky. For the turtle it doesn't work for me.


Donate if you love POTN

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Mar 22, 2014 05:15 |  #8

I use vignetting frequently, but very subtle and feathered. Since LR 5 brought the Radial Filter I often make it asymmetric or on fewer than four corners, which corresponds to the center of interest not being in the center of the frame. IMO, in the turtle shot it is too heavy, obvious and phoney looking.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Mar 22, 2014 06:24 |  #9

venom3300 wrote in post #16776669 (external link)
lens manufacturers spent years correcting lenses to no vignette. Now everyone uses software to add it back. I don't get it...

LOL. And don't use photoshop either... not even for simple adjustments like brightness, contrast, or saturation. If you do, you're evil! You're ruining photography!

Yes, vignette away. It is a useful tool to draw viewers attention toward the center. But use it strategically, on the right image. Here, yes for the turtle, no for the tower. On the turtle to draw attention in, but not on the tower because the sky is a beautiful shade of blue and the vignetting makes it look dingy, dark. The tower has a nice "open" feel which vignetting removes.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,430 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Likes: 1435
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
Mar 22, 2014 10:40 |  #10

A subtle vignette may be useful in many subjects. If you notice it, it's probably too much. It was common with hand enlarged prints in a wet lab to strengthen the edges by burning in slightly so they wouldn't look as if they faded away on the edge. Both of your images are stronger to me with the vignette, especially the lower right corner of turtle shot.

On the other hand, portraits and other photos with strong central subjects may benefit from a much stronger vignette. It draws the viewer into the center of the image. In such a case, a close observer may notice it but if the vignette draws attention to itself rather than focuses attention on the subject, it's too strong.

I have never found slight vignetting by a lens to be the problem some seem to think it is.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,740 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16841
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Mar 22, 2014 10:49 |  #11

Picture North Carolina wrote in post #16777003 (external link)
LOL. And don't use photoshop either... not even for simple adjustments like brightness, contrast, or saturation. If you do, you're evil! You're ruining photography!

Yes, vignette away. It is a useful tool to draw viewers attention toward the center. But use it strategically, on the right image. Here, yes for the turtle, no for the tower. On the turtle to draw attention in, but not on the tower because the sky is a beautiful shade of blue and the vignetting makes it look dingy, dark. The tower has a nice "open" feel which vignetting removes.

That made me laugh too. Thanks


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,119 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Mar 22, 2014 16:36 |  #12

In the tower shot there is a slight vignette from the lens, at least in the top corners anyway. That's actually probably enough for that subject. It probably helps the turtle but I think it's just a tad too strong. I would try to reduce it so that it looks more like the natural effect in the first tower image. The only time I might use a stronger vignette is when trying to create a very vintage look in a B&W conversion, I'd probably throw in quite a bit of "grain" simulation too.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,427 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Adding a vignette yes or no?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1255 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.