Cool, thanks! Here are the 2 side by side making the differences more pronounced. Then equalized....
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Mar 24, 2014 07:39 | #31 Cool, thanks! Here are the 2 side by side making the differences more pronounced. Then equalized.... Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 24, 2014 07:43 | #32 Cool, I should have done split image samples too. SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 24, 2014 07:51 | #33 Here is a quick and dirty NR process. SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 24, 2014 08:00 | #34 And finally, here is the already posted ISO6400 SOOC jpeg in a split way. NR Standard SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 24, 2014 08:11 | #35 TeamSpeed wrote in post #16781836 The tools make a huge difference in results, and even though the canon JPG engine is much improved, it still removes a ton of detail and they run very aggressive NR values with the latest bodies. If you are willing to share the 70D and 6D raw images, I can do my usual comparisons between them and post the results here in this thread. I will also run my custom noise actions to see how well they clean up while keeping details.
Image hosted by forum (680733) © palad1n [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. 6D ISO 6400 Image hosted by forum (680732) © palad1n [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Website (online) : www.lukaskrasa.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 24, 2014 08:14 | #36 same RAW NR values.. Image hosted by forum (680734) © palad1n [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. 6D RAW quick NR Image hosted by forum (680735) © palad1n [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. noise is more visible on 70D obviously, but details are retained on both images. For me it means big crops are slighter better. Website (online) : www.lukaskrasa.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 24, 2014 08:14 | #37 ^^^ now these are good examples, thank you Lukas. SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Definitely! That is more in line for what I would expect. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SqueekyBoy Member 186 posts Joined Mar 2014 More info | Mar 24, 2014 10:20 | #39 Permanent banSqueekyBoy wrote in post #16781843 Ok, thanks for the clarification. I will compare my best processed 60D to SOOC from my 6D at 6400. Interesting proposition. Although I must admit, if I know I'm going to that extreme, I'm taking the 6D. I always shoot raw. Man, I am out of my league here. You guys are pros!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1202 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||