I have read good reviews on the Fuji x100s. Would it make sense to sell everything in my signature and pick up the Fuji? Add lenses for the Fuji?
Mar 23, 2014 21:57 | #1 I have read good reviews on the Fuji x100s. Would it make sense to sell everything in my signature and pick up the Fuji? Add lenses for the Fuji? _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mgk2 Member 167 posts Joined Oct 2012 More info | Mar 23, 2014 22:18 | #2 Permanent banYou do realize that the x100s has a fixed lens right? Meaning you can't change lens?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MotorOn Senior Member 941 posts Likes: 52 Joined Feb 2007 More info | Mar 23, 2014 22:26 | #3 The Fuji x100s is a fixed lens, so I would likely recommend against selling it all to get an x100s. I'd image you should at lease ease into it. Depending upon the subject matter, I can see the Fuji's being a valid DSLR replacement platform for many, especially with the X-Pro, X-E and X-T series taking interchangeable lenses with just enough flexibility. For some I do think it's even a better option, because the portability means the camera will be with them, and the smaller bodies are less intimidating to others. But to go all at once to a fixed 22mm lens, might be a bit extreme. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mclaren777 Goldmember 1,482 posts Likes: 86 Joined May 2012 Location: Olympia, WA More info | Mar 23, 2014 23:37 | #4 Think you could get $1699 for all of your gear? A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 24, 2014 03:52 | #5 I was not aware it was fixed lens. Was the x100 fixed as well? _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mgk2 Member 167 posts Joined Oct 2012 More info | Mar 24, 2014 04:02 | #6 Permanent banFrodge wrote in post #16781598 I was not aware it was fixed lens. Was the x100 fixed as well? McLaren777, is the xt-1 a valid replacement? Both x100 and x100S have the same fixed 35mm f2 lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mclaren777 Goldmember 1,482 posts Likes: 86 Joined May 2012 Location: Olympia, WA More info | Mar 24, 2014 08:53 | #7 As mgk2 pointed out, the X-T1 is a phenomenal camera. A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 24, 2014 13:03 | #8 Frodge wrote in post #16781598 I was not aware it was fixed lens. Was the x100 fixed as well? McLaren777, is the xt-1 a valid replacement? Yes, and yes. If it weren't for my occasional need for ISO12,800+ I'd almost certainly be trading my 6D for one. Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hogloff Cream of the Crop 7,606 posts Likes: 416 Joined Apr 2003 Location: British Columbia More info | Mar 24, 2014 13:16 | #10 Permanent banMalVeauX wrote in post #16782681 Heya, Do you have any concerns with focus speed and battery life? Very best, Latest firmware release has improved the focus speed to the point it is not an issue. The camera will never be used for sports or BIF etc... and for the rest, the focus speed is just fine.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hogloff Cream of the Crop 7,606 posts Likes: 416 Joined Apr 2003 Location: British Columbia More info | Mar 24, 2014 13:22 | #11 Permanent banmgk2 wrote in post #16781167 You do realize that the x100s has a fixed lens right? Meaning you can't change lens? There are lens extenders that you attach to the X100 which will take it from a 35mm to a 28mm lens. There is also one that is about to be released that will make the lens a 50mm equivalent. The maximum aperture stays at f2 with these extenders.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MalVeauX "Looks rough and well used" More info | Mar 24, 2014 13:23 | #12 Hogloff wrote in post #16782692 The camera will never be used for sports or BIF etc... and for the rest, the focus speed is just fine. I can go for a day on one battery, never needed to use my spare. But then, I typically only shoot maybe 200 images in a long day. That's great for you.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Hogloff Cream of the Crop 7,606 posts Likes: 416 Joined Apr 2003 Location: British Columbia More info | Mar 24, 2014 13:29 | #13 Permanent banMalVeauX wrote in post #16782708 That's great for you. But it's Fodge who's interested in selling dSLR and going mirrorless. And "never" is something I'd never assume for someone else, especially someone you don't know. Maybe you should define sports and BIF before you create this staunch "never" approach to these subjects. Plenty of sports and plenty of birds in flight can be done on a slow to focus camera & lens. Been there. Done it. You probably have too. And maybe Fodge needs faster autofocus performance than you care to realize? Only he can decide that. Good enough for you. Maybe not for someone else. Battery life has a lot of factors other than "I take 200 images." You don't know if he's going into some really cold weather or doing long exposure stuff. You just hurl out there generalities that frankly sound like the same verbatim material that anyone could have read from a review and state as canon/law. ![]() smilies, in case you don't realize my tone since the internet is such a friendly place.Very best, But you are assuming the exact opposite...that the AF of the X100 will be too slow and the battery life will be an issue. At least I have experience with both the AF and battery life and I add this 2 years of experience with the camera to the conversation. How much experience have you had with the AF and where has this AF let you down?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 24, 2014 16:42 | #14 Hogloff wrote in post #16782706 There are lens extenders that you attach to the X100 which will take it from a 35mm to a 28mm lens. There is also one that is about to be released that will make the lens a 50mm equivalent. The maximum aperture stays at f2 with these extenders. I have the 28mm version and I see no loss at all with image quality. They are very compact. So if you went that route, you can have a compact kit built around the X100(s) that had f2 primes at 28mm, 35mm and 50mm...all which can be carried in your jacket pockets. Something to think about. Those extenders are what I read about. Sorry I wasn't clear in my original post. I'm just trying to figure out if the x100s is a better overall option than a 60d and t3i? What are the pitfalls of going from a dslr system like I have to a Fuji system? All other things aside, the Fuji sure is a classic looking camera. _______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 24, 2014 17:19 | #15 Now, lemme see if I get this straight. In this forum they are people that will discuss for years the pitch of the individual pixel on a sensor and the intricacies of the use of the Bayer filter. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1304 guests, 114 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||