Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 23 Mar 2014 (Sunday) 21:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Sell 60d and t3i for Fuji x100s?

 
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Mar 23, 2014 21:57 |  #1

I have read good reviews on the Fuji x100s. Would it make sense to sell everything in my signature and pick up the Fuji? Add lenses for the Fuji?


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mgk2
Member
167 posts
Joined Oct 2012
     
Mar 23, 2014 22:18 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

You do realize that the x100s has a fixed lens right? Meaning you can't change lens?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Motor ­ On
Senior Member
Avatar
941 posts
Likes: 52
Joined Feb 2007
     
Mar 23, 2014 22:26 |  #3

The Fuji x100s is a fixed lens, so I would likely recommend against selling it all to get an x100s. I'd image you should at lease ease into it. Depending upon the subject matter, I can see the Fuji's being a valid DSLR replacement platform for many, especially with the X-Pro, X-E and X-T series taking interchangeable lenses with just enough flexibility. For some I do think it's even a better option, because the portability means the camera will be with them, and the smaller bodies are less intimidating to others. But to go all at once to a fixed 22mm lens, might be a bit extreme.


Website (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mclaren777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,482 posts
Likes: 86
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Mar 23, 2014 23:37 |  #4

Think you could get $1699 for all of your gear? ;)

IMAGE: http://static.bhphoto.com/images/multiple_images/images500x500/IMG_367364.jpg

A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Mar 24, 2014 03:52 |  #5

I was not aware it was fixed lens. Was the x100 fixed as well?
McLaren777, is the xt-1 a valid replacement?


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mgk2
Member
167 posts
Joined Oct 2012
     
Mar 24, 2014 04:02 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Frodge wrote in post #16781598 (external link)
I was not aware it was fixed lens. Was the x100 fixed as well?
McLaren777, is the xt-1 a valid replacement?

Both x100 and x100S have the same fixed 35mm f2 lens.

XT-1 is a few classes above 60D....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mclaren777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,482 posts
Likes: 86
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Mar 24, 2014 08:53 |  #7

As mgk2 pointed out, the X-T1 is a phenomenal camera.


A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,007 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5395
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
Mar 24, 2014 13:03 |  #8

Frodge wrote in post #16781598 (external link)
I was not aware it was fixed lens. Was the x100 fixed as well?
McLaren777, is the xt-1 a valid replacement?

Yes, and yes. If it weren't for my occasional need for ISO12,800+ I'd almost certainly be trading my 6D for one.


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13370
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Mar 24, 2014 13:11 |  #9

Heya,

Do you have any concerns with focus speed and battery life?

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,606 posts
Likes: 416
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
Mar 24, 2014 13:16 |  #10
bannedPermanent ban

MalVeauX wrote in post #16782681 (external link)
Heya,

Do you have any concerns with focus speed and battery life?

Very best,

Latest firmware release has improved the focus speed to the point it is not an issue. The camera will never be used for sports or BIF etc... and for the rest, the focus speed is just fine.

I can go for a day on one battery, never needed to use my spare. But then, I typically only shoot maybe 200 images in a long day. If battery life concerns you, carry a spare. I shoot with a 5D2 and always have a spare battery as well...you never know.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,606 posts
Likes: 416
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
Mar 24, 2014 13:22 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

mgk2 wrote in post #16781167 (external link)
You do realize that the x100s has a fixed lens right? Meaning you can't change lens?

There are lens extenders that you attach to the X100 which will take it from a 35mm to a 28mm lens. There is also one that is about to be released that will make the lens a 50mm equivalent. The maximum aperture stays at f2 with these extenders.

I have the 28mm version and I see no loss at all with image quality. They are very compact. So if you went that route, you can have a compact kit built around the X100(s) that had f2 primes at 28mm, 35mm and 50mm...all which can be carried in your jacket pockets. Something to think about.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13370
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Mar 24, 2014 13:23 |  #12

Hogloff wrote in post #16782692 (external link)
The camera will never be used for sports or BIF etc... and for the rest, the focus speed is just fine.

I can go for a day on one battery, never needed to use my spare. But then, I typically only shoot maybe 200 images in a long day.

That's great for you.

But it's Fodge who's interested in selling dSLR and going mirrorless. And "never" is something I'd never assume for someone else, especially someone you don't know. Maybe you should define sports and BIF before you create this staunch "never" approach to these subjects. Plenty of sports and plenty of birds in flight can be done on a slow to focus camera & lens. Been there. Done it. You probably have too.

And maybe Fodge needs faster autofocus performance than you care to realize? Only he can decide that. Good enough for you. Maybe not for someone else.

Battery life has a lot of factors other than "I take 200 images." You don't know if he's going into some really cold weather or doing long exposure stuff. You just hurl out there generalities that frankly sound like the same verbatim material that anyone could have read from a review and state as canon/law.

;) ;) :p :cool: smilies, in case you don't realize my tone since the internet is such a friendly place.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hogloff
Cream of the Crop
7,606 posts
Likes: 416
Joined Apr 2003
Location: British Columbia
     
Mar 24, 2014 13:29 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

MalVeauX wrote in post #16782708 (external link)
That's great for you.

But it's Fodge who's interested in selling dSLR and going mirrorless. And "never" is something I'd never assume for someone else, especially someone you don't know. Maybe you should define sports and BIF before you create this staunch "never" approach to these subjects. Plenty of sports and plenty of birds in flight can be done on a slow to focus camera & lens. Been there. Done it. You probably have too.

And maybe Fodge needs faster autofocus performance than you care to realize? Only he can decide that. Good enough for you. Maybe not for someone else.

Battery life has a lot of factors other than "I take 200 images." You don't know if he's going into some really cold weather or doing long exposure stuff. You just hurl out there generalities that frankly sound like the same verbatim material that anyone could have read from a review and state as canon/law.

;) ;) :p :cool: smilies, in case you don't realize my tone since the internet is such a friendly place.

Very best,

But you are assuming the exact opposite...that the AF of the X100 will be too slow and the battery life will be an issue. At least I have experience with both the AF and battery life and I add this 2 years of experience with the camera to the conversation. How much experience have you had with the AF and where has this AF let you down?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Mar 24, 2014 16:42 |  #14

Hogloff wrote in post #16782706 (external link)
There are lens extenders that you attach to the X100 which will take it from a 35mm to a 28mm lens. There is also one that is about to be released that will make the lens a 50mm equivalent. The maximum aperture stays at f2 with these extenders.

I have the 28mm version and I see no loss at all with image quality. They are very compact. So if you went that route, you can have a compact kit built around the X100(s) that had f2 primes at 28mm, 35mm and 50mm...all which can be carried in your jacket pockets. Something to think about.

Those extenders are what I read about. Sorry I wasn't clear in my original post. I'm just trying to figure out if the x100s is a better overall option than a 60d and t3i? What are the pitfalls of going from a dslr system like I have to a Fuji system? All other things aside, the Fuji sure is a classic looking camera.


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,767 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 545
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Mar 24, 2014 17:19 |  #15

Now, lemme see if I get this straight. In this forum they are people that will discuss for years the pitch of the individual pixel on a sensor and the intricacies of the use of the Bayer filter.

There are others that raise holy jihad if anybody suggests that using a Clear (or UV) filter in front of the UV-filtered sensor, because it destroys the IQ of the image...

They are others that will trash a lens because it has slightly more CA than a multi-thousand dollar Zeiss...

Others will trash rather expensive zooms for being soft(er) at the corners...

And nobody blinks an eye at screwing on an adaptor TO CHANGE THE FOCAL LENGTH OF THE LENS?

Wow! Fuji must be doing a fantastic job with their optics.... Wow...


Gerry
Canon R6 MkII/Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/Σ 105ΕΧ DG/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,946 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Sell 60d and t3i for Fuji x100s?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1304 guests, 114 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.