So it looks like I may have missed focus on a couple shots, got it taken care of, thanks for the help guys...
Mar 25, 2014 14:26 | #1 So it looks like I may have missed focus on a couple shots, got it taken care of, thanks for the help guys...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 25, 2014 14:29 | #2 Hard to tell from websized images. Do you have any 100% crops? SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
runninmann what the heck do I know? More info | Mar 25, 2014 14:51 | #3 giballi wrote in post #16785499 So I'm new to the 6D coming from my 60D, do you guys think this is sharp? Is there a setting on the camera that can make them sharper out of camera? I shoot raw. Basically, I just want to make sure nothing is off with my 6D, and I'm assuming since I'm new it's prob technique or me. It's taken on a what's considered "sharp lens" and even stopped down a bit to be even sharper. I moved the sharpness slider in lightoom to about 85ish I believe? I focused on her eye and my brother using a 70-200 f4 seemed to take sharper pictures than me on the 85 at this shoot. Is the 85 just not as sharp as the 70-200? I don't think I missed focus but when I zoom it it doesn't seem as sharp as his shots? If anything it's the lens and not the camera right? Any help would be appreciated. Here are a couple from the day IMG_0258 IMG_0209 Have your brother shoot with the same combination you used while you shoot with the combination he used.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 25, 2014 14:52 | #4 I downloaded the first image. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gobeatty Senior Member 513 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2013 More info | Mar 25, 2014 15:03 | #5 For JPEGs, yes - turn up the sharpening. To 5, 6 or even 7. The default is soft. 6D | 35 f2 | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 28 - 135 f3.5 - 5.6 | 70-210 f4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ERJL Senior Member 384 posts Joined Dec 2012 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Mar 25, 2014 15:56 | #6 Permanent banIMO, the first image looks sharp in the eyes. Am presuming you were wide open or near to it? -ERJL
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 25, 2014 15:57 | #7 giballi wrote in post #16785686 So is it the camera or lens? Would the 85 act the same on my brothers as mine? I ask because I'm still in the exchange period on my 6D, seems like it's not as sharp on my lenses as the 60D Since you already said that you focused on the eye, I think your camera/lens combination is front-focusing mildly. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ERJL Senior Member 384 posts Joined Dec 2012 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Mar 25, 2014 16:01 | #8 Permanent ban^You can micro adjust for front and back focus on the 6D.^ -ERJL
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gobeatty Senior Member 513 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2013 More info | Try live view. Focusing is slow but is based on what the sensor sees. If the Liveview shots are sharper than non-live view shots, then micro adjustment is likely needed. Make sure shutter speed is sufficient to avoid motion blur. 6D | 35 f2 | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 28 - 135 f3.5 - 5.6 | 70-210 f4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 25, 2014 16:50 | #10 giballi wrote in post #16785544 I was focusing on the eye ball each time and it "locked on" using outer points for focus MakisM1 wrote in post #16785567 For f2.8 it is sharp from the tip of her left shoulder to the eyelashes in her left eye (where I assumed you focused). On the other hand, if you just used the centerpoint and come whatever it may, then it may be ok as the focus point would be on her left arm which is in focus. I don't think this is an equipment issue - With the first shot being at 2.8 the depth of field is still quite narrow and the "outer points" grabbed the closest part of the subject. You might want to experiment using the centerpoint. https://www.flickr.com/photos/22055591@N05/albums
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 25, 2014 17:00 | #11 magoosmc wrote in post #16785869 I don't think this is an equipment issue - With the first shot being at 2.8 the depth of field is still quite narrow and the "outer points" grabbed the closest part of the subject. You might want to experiment using the centerpoint. If the camera was 10 ft away the 85 @ f2.8 would produce a DOF of 0.7 ft, approximately from the eyelashes to the tip of her shoulder. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mgk2 Member 167 posts Joined Oct 2012 More info | Mar 25, 2014 22:46 | #12 Permanent banI just downloaded the first image and had a look, the focus is off...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 26, 2014 00:46 | #13 I downloaded a full resolution copy of the first photo from your Flickr. Image hosted by forum (680939) © MakisM1 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mgk2 Member 167 posts Joined Oct 2012 More info | Mar 26, 2014 01:14 | #14 Permanent ban^^^ Nice attempt Gerry, but the truth is the focus was missed, and no amount of noise reduction and/or sharpening can rescue the shot I'm afraid....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
-EuroRSN- Mostly Lurking 12 posts Joined Oct 2013 Location: Vancouver, B.C More info | Mar 26, 2014 02:05 | #15 In the first pic, its quite obvious that the focus is on the shirt and not on the eyes. I get a few missed shots with my 6d and i notice that single point doesnt work very well at times. The more focus points used, the more accurate the focus. Also when u absolutely need that perfect shot, use live view to take the photo. Contrast detection through live view works more accurately than phrase detection (non live view). CANON 6D + BG-E13 / 24-105 F4 L / 50mm 1.8 / Nikon D7000 / 35mm 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1106 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||