William Taylor wrote:
Not sure I understand your comments, but would like too. So did I over or under compensate? I was using +1 EC in those two shots. Also, I don't follow you when you say the second should've been shot portrait. Please explain.
Thanks!
WT
Dear WT,
His comment about shooting "portrait" means that it should have been shot with the long dimension vertical. That is called "portrait" orientation, whereas your choice of orientation was "landscape".
His comment regarding "too warm" relates to the white balance or color temperature. He is saying that it has the look of a shift to higher (warmer) color temperatures. This has nothing to do with Exposure Compensation. You were quite correct in giving at least one stop of extra exposure in order to place the snow at a higher Zone - such as Zone VII or Zone VIII.
The exposure compensation has little or nothing to do with white balance. Normally, white balance for a day like that would be either "Auto" or "Daylight". The only way you can get a more accurate color balance than one of those two settings is to do a custom white balance using a gray card.