Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 10 Apr 2014 (Thursday) 02:32
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Why I really feel no need for the protective filter

 
KirkS518
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Apr 10, 2014 02:32 |  #1

*********THIS IS NOT A THREAD INTENDED TO FIRE UP THE DEBATE - JUST MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE*********

I know this topic is against the Warsaw Treaty to bring up, and has been beaten to death, but I just wanted to share.

Today I did something many folks might cringe at - I set up my camera with my Rokinon fisheye in a box at the park in a way that I knew would run the risk of the lens being pecked by many beaks. My goal was to get a shot looking up at a bunch of ibis's feeding all around the lens.

I took a small cardboard box, cut a hole in the top to allow just the lens front to show, and used a wireless remote (Shutterboss). Didn't take long to get the birds to come over, and they did eat off the box (hamburger buns), but I didn't get the actual shot I was hoping for (full circle of birds feeding around the lens). What I did get was a lot of birds pecking at the box, and the lens, as the wind was blowing crumbs onto the lens. I could hear the beaks hitting the lens on at least 10 occasions from about 7 feet away, and in honesty, it made me cringe. When it was all said and done, not a scratch, scuff, nick, blemish or anything on the lens or the coating.

I've taken old lenses and dropped things on them like pilot-tipped drill bits to see how they hold up with and without 'protective' filters, but I've never had a 'real-world' situation that most would think would cause damage. Today just really re-confirmed my belief that even in 'hazardous' situations, a filter is not necessary. On a side-note, I live in Florida, near the beach, which has salt water, and I go to the beach quite often, and I don't use a filter there either.

BUT - TO EACH HIS OWN. I'm not trying to start the war, just relaying my personal experience.

Here's one of the shots I got where the bird hit the lens -

IMAGE: http://i486.photobucket.com/albums/rr224/Beefer518/Camera%20stuff/feeding_zps8fd6e31a.jpg

If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
InfiniteDivide
"I wish to be spared"
Avatar
2,844 posts
Gallery: 265 photos
Likes: 221
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Kawasaki, Japan
     
Apr 10, 2014 02:58 |  #2

^ ***RANT vmad RAVE :mad: RANT :evil: RAGE vmad FILTER :rolleyes: RAGE :mad: RANT :evil: RAVE***

:D I fear fingerprints, dirt and everything else, never considered a threat of wild Ibis's attacking my lens.


James Patrus
6D | 16-35L F4 | 24L II | 50L | 100L | |  -> Website (external link) & Gallery (external link)
Do you enjoy Super Famicom games? (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1Tanker
Goldmember
Avatar
4,470 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction
     
Apr 10, 2014 03:00 as a reply to  @ InfiniteDivide's post |  #3

Your intentions don't matter. It will turn into the typical filter argument.


Kel
Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pyrojim
Goldmember
1,882 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Apr 10, 2014 03:03 |  #4

InfiniteDivide wrote in post #16823068 (external link)
^ ***RANT vmad RAVE :mad: RANT :evil: RAGE vmad FILTER :rolleyes: RAGE :mad: RANT :evil: RAVE***

:D I fear fingerprints, dirt and everything else, never considered a threat of wild Ibis's attacking my lens.

gotcha. that is awesome.


PhaseOne H25
Camera agnostic

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
InfiniteDivide
"I wish to be spared"
Avatar
2,844 posts
Gallery: 265 photos
Likes: 221
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Kawasaki, Japan
     
Apr 10, 2014 03:05 |  #5

I figured I would just start the argument, but personally don't care what others use or don't use.


James Patrus
6D | 16-35L F4 | 24L II | 50L | 100L | |  -> Website (external link) & Gallery (external link)
Do you enjoy Super Famicom games? (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Apr 10, 2014 03:05 |  #6

1Tanker wrote in post #16823071 (external link)
Your intentions don't matter. It will turn into the typical filter argument.

I'm really hoping it won't. I've noticed the past few protective filter threads have remained quite civil, and I'm hoping this follows suit.

It really was just about my observations, and how I expected there to be something because of the lack of a filter, yet there wasn't.


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coogee
Member
172 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Sep 2013
     
Apr 10, 2014 03:20 |  #7

WHAT ABOUT THE IBIS BEAKS?! :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Apr 10, 2014 03:24 |  #8

they seem to have survived unscathed :)


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
coogee
Member
172 posts
Likes: 20
Joined Sep 2013
     
Apr 10, 2014 03:26 |  #9

lol. great idea, still a great shot even if you didn't get your circle of beaks vision.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Apr 10, 2014 03:49 |  #10

Thanks coogee. I'll be trying again. Now if they would only cooperate and follow my directions. Darn models!


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike325
Senior Member
Avatar
366 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Apr 2011
Location: MA
     
Apr 10, 2014 03:59 |  #11

Wouldn't the beaks not hurt the lens simply because they are made from a material softer than the glass?

Regardless, great shot and idea.


Flickr (external link)
panicatnabisco: Sometimes money can buy happiness. Example; camera gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Apr 10, 2014 04:13 |  #12

Yet, people use twigs as a reason for filters....

Thanks! :)


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mornnb
Goldmember
1,646 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 26
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Sydney
     
Apr 10, 2014 05:34 |  #13

Never worried around filters until I was stuck in sand for 15 hours waiting for the New Years Eve fireworks (it's a Sydney thing, big event big crowds) and scratched the front element near the edge of the 24-70mm II 2.8 simply due to some sand getting stuck in the lens cap and grinding against the lens!


Canon 5D Mark III - Leica M240
EF 16-35mm F/4 IS L - EF 14mm f/2.8 L II - - EF 17mm TS-E L - EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L II - EF 70-200mm IS II f/2.8 L - Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art - Sigma 85mm f/1.4 EX
Voigtlander 15mm III - 28mm Elmarit-M ASPH - 35mm f/1.4 Summilux-M FLE - 50mm f/1.4 Summilux-M ASPH
500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aximrocks
Member
244 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 34
Joined Aug 2005
     
Apr 10, 2014 07:44 |  #14

try again with a $1500 Canon fisheye. tell us how you really feel.


Gear List
My Album (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Invertalon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,495 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
     
Apr 10, 2014 07:58 |  #15

I personally don't see why people worry so much about what others do.

Given my experience, no matter how careful you are... Scratching the front element is easier than most people think. Maybe not into the glass exactly, but the coatings certainly.

The decision to use or not use filters have no impact on someone else. So why people get personal about it is beyond me. Who, really, cares?

Just to throw it in there, I use them with no issues. I like them for the care-free cleaning I can do when required. I had a loaner 8-15L from Canon that I cleaned the front element once with a lenspen (using bulb blower first, brush, bulb blower again and then lenspen) and the coating was marred. Coatings are not as robust as people think. I have some blemishes on my Hoya HD filters as well from careful cleaning… They look perfect in normal light, but if you shine a powerful light at proper angles you see everything.


-Steve
Facebook (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

17,059 views & 0 likes for this thread, 43 members have posted to it.
Why I really feel no need for the protective filter
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
932 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.