anyone have any ideas on how to obtain these types of tones?
http://500px.com/photo/66750115![]()
Canon_Shoe Goldmember More info | Apr 13, 2014 13:36 | #1 anyone have any ideas on how to obtain these types of tones? Facebook-- http://www.facebook.com/AndrewShoemakerPhotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotosGuy Cream of the Crop, R.I.P. More info | Apr 13, 2014 21:49 | #2 Maybe there's something in this: https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1355855 FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2014 22:00 | #3 Canon_Shoe wrote in post #16830432 anyone have any ideas on how to obtain these types of tones? http://500px.com/photo/66750115 Shoot at ISO 12,800? I'm seeing a lot of banding in the hair.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2014 22:49 | #4 chris_holtmeier wrote in post #16831447 Shoot at ISO 12,800? I'm seeing a lot of banding in the hair. Ya, by the looks of the window, I'm guessing this shot was underexposed and they boosted the shadows big time. I just like the tones Facebook-- http://www.facebook.com/AndrewShoemakerPhotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 13, 2014 22:52 | #5 |
Apr 13, 2014 22:56 | #6 gnome chompski wrote in post #16831575 exif says iso 250 edit: sorry, I thought someone was saying the shot was 12,800. sorry just looks like it was probably extremely underexposed and they boosted the shadows to +100 and the good ole Canon banding shows up Facebook-- http://www.facebook.com/AndrewShoemakerPhotography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Apr 14, 2014 00:34 | #7 Some kind of action or preset has been run against it, maybe multiple actions. It has a slight sepia/warm tone, with noise added, and it's lit well. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tonylong ...winded More info | Apr 14, 2014 01:14 | #8 Canon_Shoe wrote in post #16831564 Ya, by the looks of the window, I'm guessing this shot was underexposed and they boosted the shadows big time. I just like the tones Are you talking about the overall photo tones or the skin tones? Tony
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jon_Doh Senior Member More info | Apr 16, 2014 14:50 | #9 That's terrible for 250 ISO. I use a Kodak Brownie
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1165 guests, 163 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||