First use of new ND filters gave me the attached SOOC result.
Is this IR contamination?
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
dodgyexposure Goldmember More info | Apr 15, 2014 18:27 | #1 First use of new ND filters gave me the attached SOOC result. Image hosted by forum (682690) © dodgyexposure [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Cheers, Damien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 15, 2014 18:55 | #2 Does this happen all the time? Or only on this exposure? What brand are you using?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Apr 15, 2014 18:57 | #3 That looks like the result of using a very poor quality ND filter (or stacked filters; Hitech has had a reputation for magenta shifts when stacking their NDs in the past). What are you using? - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pdrober2 Goldmember 2,318 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Durham, NC More info | Apr 15, 2014 19:45 | #4 not sure where you shot that, but my 3 year old daughter says it's the most beautiful place she has ever seen. Fujifilm X-T1 | 23 | 27 | 56 | 90 | 55-200
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 15, 2014 23:21 | #5 Did you take any without the filter? 6D, 70-200 MKii F2.8, Tamron 24-70mm, Canon 40mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2014 01:18 | #6 NManuel01 wrote in post #16837247 Did you take any without the filter? Yes, the colours were normal. Cheers, Damien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2014 01:22 | #7 losangelino wrote in post #16836695 Does this happen all the time? Or only on this exposure? What brand are you using? Snydremark wrote in post #16836709 That looks like the result of using a very poor quality ND filter (or stacked filters; Hitech has had a reputation for magenta shifts when stacking their NDs in the past). What are you using? The filters are Formatt 3 and 6 stop filters. Cheers, Damien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2014 01:25 | #8 pdrober2 wrote in post #16836825 not sure where you shot that, but my 3 year old daughter says it's the most beautiful place she has ever seen.
Cheers, Damien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnfromPA Cream of the Crop 11,255 posts Likes: 1525 Joined May 2003 Location: Southeast Pennsylvania More info | Apr 16, 2014 06:34 | #9 Formatt is also known as Formatt Hitech, so take note of the comment by Snydermark and those found at http://www.oopoomoo.com …-hitech-filters-any-good/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2014 06:44 | #10 That looks quite similar to the results I got from a cheap ND filter. Unfortunately a colour cast this bad is very difficult to fix in software by changing the white balance. I reckon it's the main reason for why you see so many long-exposures converted to B&W. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Apr 16, 2014 09:42 | #11 Good grief; if it's doing that with a single filter I'm shocked. As mentioned above, Formatt is the shortened name for Formatt Hitech. But, yeah, it looks like it's just an extreme magenta color shift caused by those filters. Which is the reason that Cokin and Lee are used more often even though they're on the more expensive end of the scale. - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2014 18:35 | #12 hollis_f wrote in post #16837674 That looks quite similar to the results I got from a cheap ND filter. Unfortunately a colour cast this bad is very difficult to fix in software by changing the white balance. I reckon it's the main reason for why you see so many long-exposures converted to B&W. That's what I did with this shot, and others Cheers, Damien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 16, 2014 18:36 | #13 Snydremark wrote in post #16838008 Good grief; if it's doing that with a single filter I'm shocked. As mentioned above, Formatt is the shortened name for Formatt Hitech. But, yeah, it looks like it's just an extreme magenta color shift caused by those filters. Which is the reason that Cokin and Lee are used more often even though they're on the more expensive end of the scale. The single filter colour cast was less extreme than this shot, but still more than I could handle in post - I couldn't get natural colours out of them. Cheers, Damien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Snydremark my very own Lightrules moment More info | Apr 16, 2014 18:56 | #14 They're not nearly as flexible as the panel filters, but if you are just planning to use straight NDs (vs grads), you could look into some of the screw-on NDs from folks like Marumi. They make decent quality filters that won't cost you an arm and a leg, that shouldn't give you the same troubles. - Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2014 01:05 | #15 Snydremark wrote in post #16839423 They're not nearly as flexible as the panel filters, but if you are just planning to use straight NDs (vs grads), you could look into some of the screw-on NDs from folks like Marumi. They make decent quality filters that won't cost you an arm and a leg, that shouldn't give you the same troubles. Actually, these are screw in filters. I don't plan to use graduated NDs at all, so I decided to buy screw ins as being more easily and safely transported (read: for a trekking holiday) than a panel system. I bought 82mm, and have some step up rings for use on my smaller diameter lenses. Cheers, Damien
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1315 guests, 128 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||