JackWebEdit by ShaneOhMac, on FlickrLook ok?
6D, 50 1.4, f2.2, 1/160, ISO 200, YN560III Flashed
Edited First in LR 5.4, then PS CS6, then a final tweak in LR 5.4 before exporting.
Apr 17, 2014 18:37 | #1 JackWebEdit by ShaneOhMac, on FlickrLook ok? 6D, 50 1.4, f2.2, 1/160, ISO 200, YN560III Flashed Edited First in LR 5.4, then PS CS6, then a final tweak in LR 5.4 before exporting. 6D | EF 35 f2 IS | EF 50 f1.4 | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 135 f2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 17, 2014 18:55 | #2 exposure looks good,pose and expression is great,i would have liked to see a deeper depth of field to have more of the baby in focus,at least the top of the head,nice photo OLYMPUS EM1 M2. 12-100 F4 PRO.75mm f1.8,fisheye f1.8 pro. SONY A7 various manual lenses. FUJI X100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop  More info | Apr 17, 2014 20:38 | #3 I really like this one. There isn't much you can do with a newborn but you've managed to get a good pose. The tonal range works very well for me and exposure and focus work very well too. Great expression. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2014 17:17 | #4 genesimmons wrote in post #16842129 exposure looks good,pose and expression is great,i would have liked to see a deeper depth of field to have more of the baby in focus,at least the top of the head,nice photo Thanks! Yea I tend to keep it pretty thin for these because it's easier to blur the background SOOC than do it in post, for me anyways till I master the PS way. Titus213 wrote in post #16842340 I really like this one. There isn't much you can do with a newborn but you've managed to get a good pose. The tonal range works very well for me and exposure and focus work very well too. Great expression. Nice work. Thanks! I didn't expect him to be so alert for a 6 day old. So I just went with what he would allow. They are a little more pose friendly when they are "milk drunk" 6D | EF 35 f2 IS | EF 50 f1.4 | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 135 f2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChristopherStevenb Goldmember  3,547 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Ottawa, Canada More info | Jun 05, 2014 11:19 | #5 Nice. I'd pull the crop up and to the right a smidge from the bottom-left corner.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2014 12:18 | #6 blackmass wrote in post #16952601 amazing quality, have u put a diffuser for the YN560III ? or softbox ? Thanks! Just bounced off the ceiling! Christopher Steven b wrote in post #16953518 Nice. I'd pull the crop up and to the right a smidge from the bottom-left corner. Thanks! Yea I agree, touch too much headroom. Since this photo I've been doing more with masking techniques too, ever evolving. 6D | EF 35 f2 IS | EF 50 f1.4 | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 135 f2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlanRubio Senior Member  837 posts Likes: 15 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Miami, FL More info | Jun 05, 2014 12:20 | #7 I think it looks great, I'd crop in like christopher suggested. "Don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes you come alive and then go do that. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive." -Howard Thurman
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2014 12:28 | #8 Here's a couple more recent ones since this thread got resurrected!  BabyLandon by ShaneOhMac, on Flickr BabyLandon_2 by ShaneOhMac, on Flickr6D | EF 35 f2 IS | EF 50 f1.4 | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 135 f2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AlanRubio Senior Member 837 posts Likes: 15 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Miami, FL More info | Jun 05, 2014 12:32 | #9 That last one is precious! "Don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes you come alive and then go do that. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive." -Howard Thurman
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RMH Goldmember  1,000 posts Likes: 39 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Canterbury More info | Jun 05, 2014 12:43 | #10 |
Jun 05, 2014 14:04 | #11 blackmass wrote in post #16953759 look i took down the brightness and the contrast a bit, and then took off the yellowish color in the image . Not a bad rendition, I do agree the original looks a touch saturated. The warmness of the baby against the gray fabric was intentional. Thanks for looking! 6D | EF 35 f2 IS | EF 50 f1.4 | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 135 f2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 05, 2014 16:25 | #12 blackmass wrote in post #16953950 your welcome, tell me plz. u had the 1.8 50mm and u sold it to get the 50 1.4, what did u find about the 1.4 ? u take all ur photos with 2.0 and up so why to sell the 1.8 and get 1.4 ? im asking coz im gonna buy the 1.8 The 1.8 is pretty horribly built, as is documented. And the Bokeh is quite sharp to my eyes. The autofocus is super loud too, which is enough to wake a baby. 1.8 is plenty your right, but my decision didn't really take aperture into account much. 6D | EF 35 f2 IS | EF 50 f1.4 | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 135 f2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RMH Goldmember 1,000 posts Likes: 39 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Canterbury More info | Jun 05, 2014 16:27 | #13 chubbyone wrote in post #16954162 The 1.8 is pretty horribly built, as is documented. And the Bokeh is quite sharp to my eyes. The autofocus is super loud too, which is enough to wake a baby. 1.8 is plenty your right, but my decision didn't really take aperture into account much. I've had both and agree with all of the above. The colour and contrast are much better on the f1.4 too. Maybe I got a bad 1.8, but the difference was night and day when I upgraded.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Marcsaa 776 guests, 144 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
