Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 11 Feb 2006 (Saturday) 16:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Developed Prints VS Ink Prints

 
cbr929rrerion
Senior Member
Avatar
825 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, Tennessee
     
Feb 11, 2006 16:17 |  #1

I am looking for information to prove that developed prints from a LAB of digital images are better than prints from a Ink Printer.

As far as looks, quality, longevity, etc..

Does anyone have any sources to help me back my theory?


Canon 1D MKIII :lol:
Canon 1D MK II N :lol:

EF 70-200mm f2.8 L | EF 100-400 L IS | EF 24-70 f2.8 L | 50 f/1.8 II | Sigma EF-500 DG Super | Canon Back Pack

www.crotchrocketracing​.com (external link)
www.2wheelphotosports.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dchemist
Goldmember
1,632 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Woodbury, Connecticut
     
Feb 11, 2006 17:07 |  #2

I don't think they are better. I find lab prints that I get from www.whcc.com (external link) are great. Excelently quality and consistency. I have done a few ink jet prints at Westcoastimaging on their Epson 9800 using Ultrchrome inks and they are gorgeous but different than the lab prints. With the ink jet you have a chance to print on different types of cotton rag paper or other matte papers that give the images great look. The other difference is the price -- the Ink jet prints are 5-8x more expensive. I don't know about longevity -- I think they will both outlast me.

Its is something you might want to try.

Good luck,

Dennis


POTN Book Vol4 Astronomy Image Manager and BC Member
20D, 5DMkII, 50F1.4, 100F2.8 macro, 135F2, 17-40F4, 70-200F2.8, 24-105F4, 580EX

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,091 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Dec 2005
     
Feb 11, 2006 17:15 |  #3

Here's a testament to one aspect of longevity/quality from an Epson Inkjet (R300 in this case):

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE

Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jj1987
Goldmember
1,398 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Florida
     
Feb 11, 2006 19:23 |  #4

you can do the same with ultrachrome inkjet prints, or pigment though.

I used to work at a lab. The difference is that lab's are profiled and accurate, as well as when something breaks they pay to fix it, not me.

The best part of inkjet is that immediate feedback.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cbr929rrerion
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
825 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, Tennessee
     
Feb 11, 2006 23:30 |  #5

I guess my question is this.. if you had a great event in your life, and it was caught on film (digital) and wanted a print to retain, would you want inkjet or develoved in a lab and why?


Canon 1D MKIII :lol:
Canon 1D MK II N :lol:

EF 70-200mm f2.8 L | EF 100-400 L IS | EF 24-70 f2.8 L | 50 f/1.8 II | Sigma EF-500 DG Super | Canon Back Pack

www.crotchrocketracing​.com (external link)
www.2wheelphotosports.​com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Headcase650
Goldmember
Avatar
1,632 posts
Joined Jun 2004
     
Feb 12, 2006 07:42 |  #6

I realy love my lab prints, I think home printing has its place and there are exceptionaly high quality printers available but they as so exspensive. I get my prints from Mpix/miller and they always do an outstanding job and their prices are so good.


60D, Canon 18-135 IS, Sigma 10-20 hsm, 24-70 2.8 hsm, 70-200 2.8 hsm, 430EX II, and all the other stuff that goes along with it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,400 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Developed Prints VS Ink Prints
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2456 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.