Always messing with ideas, and different processing and editing ideas. So, simple question, does this work, or not?
"Straight" edit:
"Definition" edit:
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/niKtUy
Thanks.
BendTheLight Cream of the Crop 6,098 posts Likes: 29 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Barnsley, UK More info | Apr 24, 2014 02:29 | #1 Always messing with ideas, and different processing and editing ideas. So, simple question, does this work, or not? "Definition" edit: IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/niKtUy Thanks.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MartinDixon Slit-scan project master More info | Apr 24, 2014 10:25 | #2 I'd try somewhere half way between. I don't understand what the writing background is doing for you. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 24, 2014 14:17 | #3 the 2nd edit is way to over exposed,the first one looks great though OLYMPUS EM1 M2. 12-100 F4 PRO.75mm f1.8,fisheye f1.8 pro. SONY A7 various manual lenses. FUJI X100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BendTheLight THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,098 posts Likes: 29 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Barnsley, UK More info | Apr 24, 2014 16:01 | #4 Martin Dixon wrote in post #16857998 I'd try somewhere half way between. I don't understand what the writing background is doing for you. It is not necessarily "doing" anyhting. I believe that it is always worth trying new things, attempting to change the way one does things so as not to get stuck in a rut. genesimmons wrote in post #16858583 the 2nd edit is way to over exposed,the first one looks great though By "WAY" too overexposed, you mean blown out and so on? It has a tonal filter on it which is where it differs from the first, and it is brighter, but there are very few blown out areas...at least not on my monitor (calibrated 2 days ago).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LeftHandedBrisket Combating camera shame since 1977... More info | Am I the only one that expected to see a photo of themself in here? PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Yes I meant blown out. By the eyes on the second one. Nice close up shot OLYMPUS EM1 M2. 12-100 F4 PRO.75mm f1.8,fisheye f1.8 pro. SONY A7 various manual lenses. FUJI X100
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 24, 2014 22:06 | #7 I see what you are trying to do here. I would bring back some of the black/contrast in the muzzle to get the same separation from the background overlay as the back of the head.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KirkS518 Goldmember 3,983 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2012 Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh More info | Apr 24, 2014 23:51 | #9 I like both of them. If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BendTheLight THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,098 posts Likes: 29 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Barnsley, UK More info | Apr 25, 2014 02:37 | #10 hes gone wrote in post #16859111 =he's gone;16859111]Am I the only one that expected to see a photo of themself in here? Heh heh. genesimmons wrote in post #16859423 Yes I meant blown out. By the eyes on the second one. Nice close up shot Ok. It is bright - not sure it's entirely blown though (Just checked - numerically, brightest is 245,245,243 - close but not blown). I will try to darken that a little and create separartion as Dave3222 suggests below. Dave3222 wrote in post #16859530 I see what you are trying to do here. I would bring back some of the black/contrast in the muzzle to get the same separation from the background overlay as the back of the head. Yes, I could try that. Which would help with what genesimmons is saying above. Bianchi wrote in post #16859637 Numero Ono... But with the sharpness of Baboon in #2...To bad his hair is blocking his right eye. "By the light of the moon, the big baboon was combing his golden hair..." KirkS518 wrote in post #16859663 I like both of them. The first is a nice portrait/capture, and the processing looks good. The second makes me think it's a page out of something Darwin would have written. The processing (good or bad) makes it look almost like an image from a page out of a book circa 1800's. I could actually envision the second one hanging in the baboon hall of a zoo or a museum. I think you hit the nail on the head with the idea I had...a naturalist's journal...I should attempt to make it more like that, I think.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BendTheLight THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,098 posts Likes: 29 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Barnsley, UK More info | Apr 25, 2014 02:45 | #11 Another edit...this is the original version with the definition applied.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MartinDixon Slit-scan project master More info | Apr 25, 2014 04:07 | #12 I like these and am warming to your original idea. I still think something in between. flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BendTheLight THREAD STARTER Cream of the Crop 6,098 posts Likes: 29 Joined Feb 2010 Location: Barnsley, UK More info | Apr 25, 2014 04:15 | #13 Martin Dixon wrote in post #16859894 I like these and am warming to your original idea. I still think something in between. Now I understand the writing I see potential, but I feel the need something to make it obvious what the writing is. I did make the word "Baboon" fairly obvious at the top left, as a lead in...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 905 guests, 122 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||