Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 Apr 2014 (Thursday) 21:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon 5d mark iii video, what do you do for professional quality?

 
jonathanheierle
Senior Member
Avatar
714 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 171
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Eastern Oregon
     
Apr 24, 2014 21:37 |  #1

I'm getting a 5d mark iii this weekend, I usually only take photos but I'm super curious as to what I can make video wise, what do you do to make your video go from "meh" to professional looking stuff? post processing? in camera settings?


Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Apr 24, 2014 21:39 |  #2

I've actually looked into this a few hours ago since I'm getting a 5DIII too.

It looks like Magic Lantern RAW video is the way to go for best quality. And process it well too :)


SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonathanheierle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
714 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 171
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Eastern Oregon
     
Apr 24, 2014 21:42 |  #3

gabebalazs wrote in post #16859475 (external link)
I've actually looked into this a few hours ago since I'm getting a 5DIII too.

It looks like Magic Lantern RAW video is the way to go for best quality. And process it well too :)

I can't wait to get mine this weekend! Do you think ML Raw is really going to make a huge difference between the normal video? and what do you do for processing?


Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phantelope
Goldmember
Avatar
1,889 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 40
Joined Sep 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Apr 24, 2014 21:58 |  #4

I think the main issue is going to be keeping things in focus and avoiding noise from AF and IS. If you really want to do video of moving objects, you probably won't get around buying one of those rigs that allow you to push/pull focus, doing this by hand with an AF lens is very hard. I use Premiere Pro for video, probably more than you want to spend, but I'm not familiar with other software. I think Adobe makes an elements version of Premiere? Worth looking into.

Using RAW video requires quite a powerful computer or lots of coffee and reading materials...


40D, 5D3, a bunch of lenses and other things :cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonathanheierle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
714 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 171
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Eastern Oregon
     
Apr 24, 2014 22:37 |  #5

phantelope wrote in post #16859514 (external link)
I think the main issue is going to be keeping things in focus and avoiding noise from AF and IS. If you really want to do video of moving objects, you probably won't get around buying one of those rigs that allow you to push/pull focus, doing this by hand with an AF lens is very hard. I use Premiere Pro for video, probably more than you want to spend, but I'm not familiar with other software. I think Adobe makes an elements version of Premiere? Worth looking into.

Using RAW video requires quite a powerful computer or lots of coffee and reading materials...

I don't do enough video to justify a rig, even a stabilizer wouldnt be justifiable for me yet, just a tripod which I already have, I wish I had the 70D for video, my problem would be solved haha, can you install push and pull focus systems without a giant rig? I have a macbook pro retina so check on the powerful computer, I might not have the patience to go through hours of reading but if it gets me the results ill be patient


Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Apr 25, 2014 07:41 |  #6

If I was doing video, I'd pick up a cheap MF lens. Better MF ring, manual aperture, no noises. Also, since video is just 1080p, you won't really notice much if any impact on IQ.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Obviously it's a good thing
Avatar
12,730 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 679
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
Apr 25, 2014 09:39 as a reply to  @ Sirrith's post |  #7

To go from "meh" to good looking stuff - well, to me that hasn't much to do with technology today. Everything sensible gives good quality, from a technical point of view.

No, it's much more about planning, directing, cutting, adding music and such stuff. Random recording of kids running around in the garden is fun to have for yourself, but will inevitably bring at least 50% of external audience to sleep in less than five minutes.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Apr 25, 2014 09:43 |  #8

jonathanheierle wrote in post #16859577 (external link)
I don't do enough video to justify a rig, even a stabilizer wouldnt be justifiable for me yet, just a tripod which I already have, I wish I had the 70D for video, my problem would be solved haha, can you install push and pull focus systems without a giant rig? I have a macbook pro retina so check on the powerful computer, I might not have the patience to go through hours of reading but if it gets me the results ill be patient

Imagine how silly you would find someone who wanted to make pro photos, but didnt want to invest in that good camera stuff. You get out of it what you put in. While DSLR's have the sensor technology and access to superior lenses for video, its still not well suited to the task because of form factor. I understand that it might not be worth the investment, but you have to temper your expectations to fit the investment.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jefzor
Senior Member
788 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2013
     
Apr 25, 2014 09:51 |  #9

Lots of preparation.


www.jefpauwels.be (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
losangelino
Senior Member
972 posts
Gallery: 76 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 403
Joined Jul 2012
     
Apr 25, 2014 09:54 |  #10

Good light.



Flickr (external link)
IG: @lensesandwheels (external link)cars | @photomagicology (external link) portraits
website: ClothesAndDagger.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonathanheierle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
714 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 171
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Eastern Oregon
     
Apr 25, 2014 12:20 |  #11

I think post processing is what I have the most trouble with, how exactly do you do good color correction? and using what programs?


Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ralliart_04
Senior Member
260 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
     
Apr 26, 2014 00:48 |  #12

Nail the focus and exposure. Make sure you have steady and useable video clips. Composition is also important. Keeping the shots simple may be a good start. Gliding, sliding, panning, and aerial shots may come later on. Also get to know your gear. You can always do more with less. Try to shoot at different angles. Try to have wide, mid, and close up shots of a specific subject. These thing will help you in editing your final video. Editing tools may be as simple as the imovie or final cut pro or premiere pro. Keep shooting.


Canon 6D/ 7D2 / 50 F1.4 / 70-200 F2.8L IS II / / 135L / Fuji X-T1 / Fuji 23 F1.4 ; Flashes: 2 x Yongnuo 600
Feedback:https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?​p=17932199

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Apr 26, 2014 02:01 |  #13

external microphone. Sound is really important.

Really good editing, also very important. Video cant have gaps and move constantly. It's pretty hard to create good videos.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Apr 26, 2014 02:04 |  #14

apersson850 wrote in post #16860297 (external link)
No, it's much more about planning, directing, cutting, adding music and such stuff. Random recording of kids running around in the garden is fun to have for yourself, but will inevitably bring at least 50% of external audience to sleep in less than five minutes.

pretty much NAILS it. Video is an area where a guy with stupidly cheap handicam, can blow away high end systems easily. A well edited video is a million times better than a high quality video that's boring and lame.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jonathanheierle
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
714 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 171
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Eastern Oregon
     
Apr 26, 2014 08:53 |  #15

Alright, how about color correction though??


Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,240 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Canon 5d mark iii video, what do you do for professional quality?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is SteveeY
1243 guests, 180 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.