I'm getting a 5d mark iii this weekend, I usually only take photos but I'm super curious as to what I can make video wise, what do you do to make your video go from "meh" to professional looking stuff? post processing? in camera settings?
Apr 24, 2014 21:37 | #1 I'm getting a 5d mark iii this weekend, I usually only take photos but I'm super curious as to what I can make video wise, what do you do to make your video go from "meh" to professional looking stuff? post processing? in camera settings? Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 24, 2014 21:39 | #2 I've actually looked into this a few hours ago since I'm getting a 5DIII too. SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 24, 2014 21:42 | #3 gabebalazs wrote in post #16859475 I've actually looked into this a few hours ago since I'm getting a 5DIII too. It looks like Magic Lantern RAW video is the way to go for best quality. And process it well too ![]() I can't wait to get mine this weekend! Do you think ML Raw is really going to make a huge difference between the normal video? and what do you do for processing? Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 24, 2014 21:58 | #4 I think the main issue is going to be keeping things in focus and avoiding noise from AF and IS. If you really want to do video of moving objects, you probably won't get around buying one of those rigs that allow you to push/pull focus, doing this by hand with an AF lens is very hard. I use Premiere Pro for video, probably more than you want to spend, but I'm not familiar with other software. I think Adobe makes an elements version of Premiere? Worth looking into. 40D, 5D3, a bunch of lenses and other things
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 24, 2014 22:37 | #5 phantelope wrote in post #16859514 I think the main issue is going to be keeping things in focus and avoiding noise from AF and IS. If you really want to do video of moving objects, you probably won't get around buying one of those rigs that allow you to push/pull focus, doing this by hand with an AF lens is very hard. I use Premiere Pro for video, probably more than you want to spend, but I'm not familiar with other software. I think Adobe makes an elements version of Premiere? Worth looking into. Using RAW video requires quite a powerful computer or lots of coffee and reading materials... I don't do enough video to justify a rig, even a stabilizer wouldnt be justifiable for me yet, just a tripod which I already have, I wish I had the 70D for video, my problem would be solved haha, can you install push and pull focus systems without a giant rig? I have a macbook pro retina so check on the powerful computer, I might not have the patience to go through hours of reading but if it gets me the results ill be patient Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sirrith Cream of the Crop More info | Apr 25, 2014 07:41 | #6 If I was doing video, I'd pick up a cheap MF lens. Better MF ring, manual aperture, no noises. Also, since video is just 1080p, you won't really notice much if any impact on IQ. -Tom
LOG IN TO REPLY |
apersson850 Obviously it's a good thing More info | To go from "meh" to good looking stuff - well, to me that hasn't much to do with technology today. Everything sensible gives good quality, from a technical point of view. Anders
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Apr 25, 2014 09:43 | #8 jonathanheierle wrote in post #16859577 I don't do enough video to justify a rig, even a stabilizer wouldnt be justifiable for me yet, just a tripod which I already have, I wish I had the 70D for video, my problem would be solved haha, can you install push and pull focus systems without a giant rig? I have a macbook pro retina so check on the powerful computer, I might not have the patience to go through hours of reading but if it gets me the results ill be patient Imagine how silly you would find someone who wanted to make pro photos, but didnt want to invest in that good camera stuff. You get out of it what you put in. While DSLR's have the sensor technology and access to superior lenses for video, its still not well suited to the task because of form factor. I understand that it might not be worth the investment, but you have to temper your expectations to fit the investment.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 25, 2014 09:54 | #10 Good light.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 25, 2014 12:20 | #11 I think post processing is what I have the most trouble with, how exactly do you do good color correction? and using what programs? Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ralliart_04 Senior Member 260 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2008 More info | Apr 26, 2014 00:48 | #12 Nail the focus and exposure. Make sure you have steady and useable video clips. Composition is also important. Keeping the shots simple may be a good start. Gliding, sliding, panning, and aerial shots may come later on. Also get to know your gear. You can always do more with less. Try to shoot at different angles. Try to have wide, mid, and close up shots of a specific subject. These thing will help you in editing your final video. Editing tools may be as simple as the imovie or final cut pro or premiere pro. Keep shooting. Canon 6D/ 7D2 / 50 F1.4 / 70-200 F2.8L IS II / / 135L / Fuji X-T1 / Fuji 23 F1.4 ; Flashes: 2 x Yongnuo 600
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 26, 2014 02:01 | #13 external microphone. Sound is really important. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 26, 2014 02:04 | #14 apersson850 wrote in post #16860297 No, it's much more about planning, directing, cutting, adding music and such stuff. Random recording of kids running around in the garden is fun to have for yourself, but will inevitably bring at least 50% of external audience to sleep in less than five minutes. pretty much NAILS it. Video is an area where a guy with stupidly cheap handicam, can blow away high end systems easily. A well edited video is a million times better than a high quality video that's boring and lame. Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 26, 2014 08:53 | #15 Alright, how about color correction though?? Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1243 guests, 180 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||