Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 15 Jul 2003 (Tuesday) 14:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

USB 1.0 vs USB 2.0 and other stuff

 
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Avatar
3,914 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
     
Jul 15, 2003 14:09 |  #1

I just discovered something really nifty about my new computer (although annoying at the same time).

It came with a 6-in-1 card reader, which I thought was hooked directly to a PCI card slot or maybe an IDE slot so it should have gone faster. And in fact it did as compared to loading from camera or from my picture pad via USB 1.0. (basically about 2 minutes instead of 4 minutes per card). Plus the card is loaded directly into the drive; very convienent when at home. The time to load the card into the picture pad itself is normally about 2-3 minutes, so until I got the 6-in-1 it was faster to load the CF cards into the picture pad and then dump all at once to the computer instead of using the camera connection one card at a time.

However, I recently got the USB2.0 adapter for the picture pad and tried it out on my new computer. I discovered that the front USB ports (part of the 6-in-1 device) are USB1.0. I learned this because my computer warned that I had a USB 2.0 device plugged into a USB 1.0 port. However, I knew my computer had USB 2.0 ports so I tried the back ones. Way faster. What used to take 4 minutes per card now takes about 15 seconds.

So unless my computer is sitting right there, I am back to downloading my CF cards to the picture pad.

The annoying part is I was under the impression that all of my USB ports were 2.0 capable. I also have 2 firewire ports, one on the back and one on the front (again as part of the 6-in-1). So am very curious if one will go faster then the other, but don't have any firewire devices to try it out with.

The above experience was similiar to the one where I thought my lenses were autofocusing plenty fast, but a friend thought they were really slow. And then I got the 16-35L and it was way faster and the 50/1.4 is faster still.

Learn something new every day or so.

Thought I would share


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com (external link)
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
THREAD ­ STARTER
obsolete as of this post
Avatar
3,914 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
     
Jul 28, 2003 09:56 |  #2

Update:
I discovered this weekend that all of my USB ports are 2.0 capable. I also discovered that no matter which port I used I had to plug the Picture Pad in, let it register, and then unplug it and plug it in a different port.
Apparently the first time I plug it in the computer defaults the USB ports to 1.0, the second time it sets them to 2.0. Kind of strange, but easy to handle.

USB 2.0 is much faster then USB 1. Downloading this weekend's photo shoots (about 8gig) took less then 6 minutes. It used to take 45+ minutes. Much improved.


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com (external link)
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Laziferous
Goldmember
Avatar
1,570 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD
     
Jul 29, 2003 06:05 |  #3

IEEE 1394 ports are rated at about 400mb/s... and USB 2.0 are rated at about 480mb/s. I have USB 1, and 1394 ports on my computer. My card reader is USB 1... so you already know what my rate of transfer is... slow. About 12mb/s

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


I only have one firewire compatible device... and it's not my card reader
IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

blah something clever blah blahdie blah.....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,204 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
USB 1.0 vs USB 2.0 and other stuff
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography
1741 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.