Arches NP
by andrewjsan, on Flickr
sansational Reverse Psychologist  More info | Mar 08, 2015 12:55 | #646
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 09, 2015 06:46 | #647 I have a question for you guys (girls) did all of you buy the dock with this lens or just when it wasn't behaving the way you want it too thanks.... Please call me Sandra
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 09, 2015 07:08 | #648 You would only really need the dock with out micro adjusting in your body. 5D4 ~ 80D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
misty66 Goldmember  More info Post edited over 8 years ago by misty66. | Mar 09, 2015 08:19 | #649 Thanks Andy Please call me Sandra
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I didn't get the dock either, but I did need some +MFA. It has been three months now and I am completely satisfied. Sony A7RIII, Tamron 28mm 2.8 Di III OSD M1:2, Sonnar T* FE 55mm f/1.8 ZA, Canon 200mm 2.8L ii, Sigma MC-11, HVL-F43M
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vertigo235 Goldmember More info | Mar 09, 2015 12:52 | #651 I should be ordering one at the end of the week.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 09, 2015 16:21 | #652 has anyone used this lens and v2 of the canon 24-70? Is the sigma noticeably sharper? R5 / EOS R / 24-70 2.8L MK II / 70-200 2.8L IS MK II / Sigma 50 1.4 Art / 430 EX II / YN 568 EX II / YN-622C / YN 622C-TX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 09, 2015 16:30 | #653 awilson18 wrote in post #17467789 has anyone used this lens and v2 of the canon 24-70? Is the sigma noticeably sharper? -Adam I had the MK2 for a short while. It's comparable but not really the same purpose IMHO. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TwoHotShoes Goldmember More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Two Hot Shoes. | Mar 09, 2015 17:17 | #654 Here is a snap from today as someone asked me is the 50mm was sharp. I think it is... with +6 on AFMA anyway  Image hosted by forum (716690) © Two Hot Shoes [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Fujifilm cameras and lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 09, 2015 19:35 | #655 Two Hot Shoes wrote in post #17467855 Here is a snap from today as someone asked me is the 50mm was sharp. I think it is... with +6 on AFMA anyway 
 Hosted photo: posted by Two Hot Shoes in ./showthread.php?p=17467855&i=i23470444 forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive
A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 10, 2015 07:50 | #656 Not sure my 35 is any better than the 50, I'll have to look it it now you said that Fujifilm cameras and lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 10, 2015 08:05 | #657 Two Hot Shoes wrote in post #17468597 Not sure my 35 is any better than the 50, I'll have to look it it now you said that  Could be that the AF is a bit out as I've had to AFMA it twice so far - probably got it a bit out the first time though. It is very sharp though. Ya that could be it. I remember it took some -1, 4, 2, -6 on my 35 it was some kinda funky but after that it was solid. A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
LOG IN TO REPLY |
AndyR Goldmember  More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Andy R. | Mar 10, 2015 12:43 | #658 I had to adjust mine as well, I'm just sad that my 5d doesn't have the feature too because I love this lens so much. I'll probably end up swapping my bodies around and buy a 6D I I can use it(any reason to upgrade right lol) Other than its weight it is perfect, and it just lets me know it's built to last! 5D4 ~ 80D
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 10, 2015 13:02 | #659 The dock will do the same thing, just a bit more awkward to set up as you have to keep swapping it between camera and dock to check/setup. Fujifilm cameras and lenses.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PineBomb I have many notable flaws  More info | Mar 10, 2015 13:17 | #660 Two Hot Shoes wrote in post #17469007 The dock will do the same thing, just a bit more awkward to set up as you have to keep swapping it between camera and dock to check/setup. It is awkward. I did this with the 18-35mm. Multiply that process times four different focal lengths. I got there, but I never want to do it again. -Matt
LOG IN TO REPLY |
| x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 683 guests, 121 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
