Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 06 May 2014 (Tuesday) 00:24
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Disneyland Camera Advice

 
effstop
Senior Member
810 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
     
May 06, 2014 00:24 |  #1

I'm going with the family (wife and 2 boys) to Disneyland for 2 days. I live in San Diego so it's only an hour drive and will go back again in December (per the wifey). So, I'm tempted to not even bring my body and rely my iPhone but my gut is telling me to bring a body and one lens.

So, I'm debating about bringing the 5d + 50mm 1.8 as it's light, low light capable, and have to think a little before shooting. The other option is the 5d + 24-70mm which gives me great flexibility and is my workhorse lens albeit a little heavier. What are your thoughts?


5D MKI | 1D MKII | 24-70mm 2.8 L | 80-200MM 2.8 L | 400mm 5.6 L |50mm 1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
slookx24
Member
Avatar
233 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2014
Location: Los Angeles
     
May 06, 2014 00:42 |  #2
bannedPermanently

I say the 24-70. I don't think the 50 is wide enough at Disneyland, even on FF. The things you tend to shoot at Disneyland tend to be closer to you, so I think the 24-70 would be more useful.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
InfiniteDivide
"I wish to be spared"
Avatar
2,844 posts
Gallery: 265 photos
Likes: 221
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Kawasaki, Japan
     
May 06, 2014 01:18 |  #3

Take the 5D and get the 40mm stm. It's cheap, lightweight, and sharp on FF. f2.8 should be enough in low light.


James Patrus
6D | 16-35L F4 | 24L II | 50L | 100L | |  -> Website (external link) & Gallery (external link)
Do you enjoy Super Famicom games? (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bratkinson
Senior Member
643 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Western MA
     
May 06, 2014 03:19 |  #4

Shortly before my 30th birthday, I and a group of co-workers I was with on a project in LA decided we had to see Disneyland. For the day, I was toting an all-metal Canon EF camera with FD 35-70 f2.8-3.5 on it and perhaps 8 rolls of film. By the time we packed it in about 6PM, my shoulder was killing me, but other than that, I was in good shape. At 66, I wouldn't THINK of taking my 5D3 and anything other than a prime, perhaps 35, 40 or a 50. That's about it. As I've seen it before and can always dig out my slides from 1977, I'd travel light. I might even go with just my new 'bang around' G15. Even in full auto, the JPG results are great!


"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." General George S Patton, Jr 1885-1945

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2slo
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,497 posts
Gallery: 1105 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 17721
Joined Oct 2011
     
May 06, 2014 03:46 as a reply to  @ bratkinson's post |  #5

Your 24-70. I love my prime lenses but the difficulty with using a prime in Disneyland is you can't always move to where you want to take the shot from. The zoom gives that added flexibility. I took my 24-105mm f/4 and it covered what I needed just fine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Staszek
Goldmember
Avatar
3,606 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
May 06, 2014 03:59 |  #6

Definitely take the 24-70 over the 50. At Disneyland, I often found myself using 16mm over 24mm but that's mainly because I had it available. I'd make 24mm work for me now, looking back at it all my portraits are super distorted HAH!


SOSKIphoto (external link) | Blog (external link) | Facebook (external link)| Instagram (external link)
Shooting with big noisy cameras and a bag of primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gregg.Siam
Goldmember
Avatar
2,383 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Bangkok
     
May 06, 2014 04:45 |  #7

Do your pictures mean anything to you? Bring your body with a carry around lens of some sort.

I think I would take the 24-70 despite it being heavier. Zooming with your feet might not be an option as the place tends to get crowded.

Anyone that decides to shoot with an iPhone should be banned from the forums :p


5D MKIII | 24-105mm f/4 L| 50mm f/1.8 | 600EX-RT [FONT=Tahoma][COLOR=bl​ue][FONT="]|
∞ 500px (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jaomul
Goldmember
Avatar
1,236 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Cork, Ireland
     
May 06, 2014 05:11 |  #8

Zoom. You could stick the prime in the car and swap when it gets darker, or just in a pocket


flickr (external link)
Olympus EM5,Nikon d7200,
Olympus 12-50mm, 40-150mm,17mm f2.8,Nikon 50mm F1.8, Tamron 90mm vc, 18-105mmVR, Sigma 18-35 f1.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ from ­ PA
Cream of the Crop
11,256 posts
Likes: 1526
Joined May 2003
Location: Southeast Pennsylvania
     
May 06, 2014 06:04 |  #9

Staszek wrote in post #16885263 (external link)
Definitely take the 24-70 over the 50. At Disneyland, I often found myself using 16mm over 24mm but that's mainly because I had it available. I'd make 24mm work for me now, looking back at it all my portraits are super distorted HAH!

^^This, for the added versatility. And forget the 40mm f2.8 over the existing 50mm f1.8, I just don't see benefit over the zoom.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
timbop
Goldmember
Avatar
2,980 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 18
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Southern New Jersey, USA
     
May 06, 2014 06:50 |  #10

agreed on the zoom; you're going to need it. I used to take my backpack with some homemade trailmix, water bottles, camera, fast prime, and zoom


Current: 5DM3, 6D, 8mm fish, 24-105/4IS, 35/2IS, 70-200/2.8IS, 85/1.8, 100-400/IS v1, lensbaby composer with edge 80, 580's and AB800's
Formerly: 80D, 7D, 300D, 5D, 5DM2, 20D, 50D, 1DM2, 17-55IS, 24-70/2.8, 28-135IS, 40/2.8, 50/1.8, 50/1.4, 70-200/4IS, 70-300IS, 70-200/2.8, 100 macro, 400/5.6, tammy 17-50 and 28-75, sigma 50 macro & 100-300

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mark2009
Goldmember
Avatar
2,001 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 132
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Northeast , USA
     
May 06, 2014 07:13 as a reply to  @ timbop's post |  #11

Of course everyone will have a different opinion. I have been to disney many times over the years. I use to bring everything. Last year I bought, and brought only my canon g1x to disney, then Vegas trip, and have wonderful pictures. In February, I only brought my sony rx100, slide into my cargo shorts, and again have great pictures. If your going on rides, etc, it is a pain with gear.
My first suggestion is go pick up a canon g15, S110, or something similar, all reasonably priced, better but more expensive would be a canon g1x, or sony rx100, If bringing your existing gear, I would bring just the 24-70....looking at my pictures, they were all under 50mm..

My last trip in February, I noticed probably 70% using there phones, 25% advanced point shoot(g series type stuff or similar), and 5% walking around around with dslr's...just my observation.

Going to disney with my family is a 12 hr day. Do you want to carry a backpack full of gear, or a dslr around you neck for 12hrs? Some do, I have, but not anymore.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
May 06, 2014 07:18 |  #12

effstop wrote in post #16885049 (external link)
I'm going with the family (wife and 2 boys) to Disneyland for 2 days. I live in San Diego so it's only an hour drive and will go back again in December (per the wifey). So, I'm tempted to not even bring my body and rely my iPhone but my gut is telling me to bring a body and one lens.

If you want to make a few nice photos and still have a good family experience, buy or rent a decent point-n-shoot (NOT an iPhone - it has a fixed focal length) for the trip.

Make the experience fun for the whole family.

Now, if the whole family is "into photography" in a way that makes the purpose of the trip actually for the photography then it makes sense to haul bigger better camera equipment and a good tripod.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rdwalton
Member
Avatar
153 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
     
May 06, 2014 07:19 |  #13

Gregg.Siam wrote in post #16885310 (external link)
Do your pictures mean anything to you? Bring your body with a carry around lens of some sort.

I think I would take the 24-70 despite it being heavier. Zooming with your feet might not be an option as the place tends to get crowded.

Anyone that decides to shoot with an iPhone should be banned from the forums :p

Amen! :)


Reginald D. Walton | GEAR | Smugmugexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
groundloop
Senior Member
995 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Jun 2012
     
May 06, 2014 07:22 |  #14

mark2009 wrote in post #16885469 (external link)
Of course everyone will have a different opinion. I have been to disney many times over the years. I use to bring everything. Last year I bought, and brought only my canon g1x to disney, then Vegas trip, and have wonderful pictures. In February, I only brought my sony rx100, slide into my cargo shorts, and again have great pictures. If your going on rides, etc, it is a pain with gear.
My first suggestion is go pick up a canon g15, S110, or something similar, all reasonably priced, If bringing your existing gear, I would bring just the 24-70....looking at my pictures, they were all under 50mm..

My last trip in February, I noticed probably 70% using there phones, 25% advanced point shoot(g series type stuff or similar), and 5% walking around around with dslr's...just my observation.



^^^^THIS^^^^

I've been a couple of times with the kids. As crowded as it can get, and if you want to get on rides with your kids (as opposed to being their dedicated photographer) this would work way better than lugging around a dslr all day.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mathogre
Goldmember
Avatar
3,837 posts
Gallery: 122 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1391
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Oakton, VA USA
     
May 06, 2014 09:18 as a reply to  @ groundloop's post |  #15

I'll play devil's advocate. Bring the 50mm.

Yes it's a fixed focal length lens. Yes, you'll have to think a bit more. This is a vacation. If you were shooting "The Architecture and Fantasy of Disneyland", the 50mm probably wouldn't work. It's a vacation though.

You want pictures of your kids and your wife, and she'll want pictures of your kids and you. You'll also want pictures of your kids with the characters. 50mm will work fine. For shots of the Disneyland property, you should have little trouble composing pictures with the 50mm, though you might have to work a bit with the Castle.

The 50mm will get you an extra 1.5 stops over The Brick, though there are certainly limitations going down to f/1.8. No matter, you get some extra light. You might even bring a flash with a diffuser (Sto-Fen or similar) for night portrait shooting with your kids and characters. What you lose in flexibility with a zoom you can make up in nice bokeh by going wide on aperture with the 50.

Whatever you take for a lens, have fun! It's a family vacation.


Graham
My Photo Collection (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,446 views & 0 likes for this thread, 30 members have posted to it.
Disneyland Camera Advice
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is EBiffany
1605 guests, 98 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.