Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 09 May 2014 (Friday) 16:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

New Sigma 50mm f1.4 ART vs old Sigma 50mm f1.4

 
HansSteinert
Senior Member
419 posts
Joined Feb 2011
     
May 09, 2014 16:02 |  #1

So I've been reading a lot of posts about the new Siggy. How's it stack up against it's cheaper brother? I have the old one and have always been happy with it, anybody done any side by side comparisons with the two?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hiketheplanet
Senior Member
Avatar
666 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 14
Joined May 2013
     
May 09, 2014 16:10 |  #2

Most comparisons are against much more expensive lenses like the 50L or Zeiss 55 OTUS. That's the league the new Sigma 50 Art is in anyway :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snake0ape
Goldmember
Avatar
1,223 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
     
May 09, 2014 16:21 |  #3

I plan to keep both when I get my new one (on pre-order). They are different lens design. The old sigma renders like the 50L. And the new design renders more like the zeiss OTUS. You can look at those images and you will see the differences. I plan to use the old sigma that will specialize for dreamy-looking portraits. I plan to use the new sigma when I need corner to corner sharpness and f1.4.


5Diii | 50D | 8-15L 4| 16-35L 2.8 II| 24-70L 2.8 II | 70-200L 2.8 IS II |Tamy 150-600 | Σ35Art 1.4 | 40 2.8 | Σ50Art 1.4 | 85L 1.2 II | 100 2.8 Macro | Helios 44-3 58mm f2.0 |Helios 40-1 85mm f1.5 | 1.4x & 2x teleconverters

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MakisM1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,773 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Likes: 550
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
May 09, 2014 16:26 |  #4

snake0ape wrote in post #16893528 (external link)
I plan to keep both when I get my new one (on pre-order). They are different lens design. The old sigma renders like the 50L. And the new design renders more like the zeiss OTUS. You can look at those images and you will see the differences. I plan to use the old sigma that will specialize for dreamy-looking portraits. I plan to use the new sigma when I need corner to corner sharpness and f1.4.

I am looking forward to your posting side-by-side the same photo, so we can appreciate the differences in rendering. :D I hope it gets delivered soon. I don't think there will be many that are fortunate enough to have both! (Should I say rich enough, or well-to-do?)...

It's on my list (the Sigma) but probably around Santa's time...:cool:


Gerry
Canon R6 MkII/Canon 5D MkIII/Canon 60D/Canon EF-S 18-200/Canon EF 24-70L USM II/Canon EF 70-200L 2.8 USM II/Canon EF 50 f1.8 II/Σ 8-16/Σ 105ΕΧ DG/ 430 EXII
OS: Linux Ubuntu/PostProcessing: Darktable/Image Processing: GIMP

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HansSteinert
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
419 posts
Joined Feb 2011
     
May 09, 2014 17:56 |  #5

snake0ape wrote in post #16893528 (external link)
I plan to keep both when I get my new one (on pre-order). They are different lens design. The old sigma renders like the 50L. And the new design renders more like the zeiss OTUS. You can look at those images and you will see the differences. I plan to use the old sigma that will specialize for dreamy-looking portraits. I plan to use the new sigma when I need corner to corner sharpness and f1.4.

That's a really interesting way of putting it. I agree the old siggy always had a dreamy look.

My use is primarily video (I film with a Magic Lantern 5D III in raw 1080p, equivalent to photography raw but in video). Trying to figure out if it's worth upgrading that that resolution.

I'm very much looking forward to your comparisons as well once you get yours. Would be thread worthy.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snake0ape
Goldmember
Avatar
1,223 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
     
May 09, 2014 18:05 |  #6

MakisM1 wrote in post #16893547 (external link)
I am looking forward to your posting side-by-side the same photo, so we can appreciate the differences in rendering. :D I hope it gets delivered soon. I don't think there will be many that are fortunate enough to have both! (Should I say rich enough, or well-to-do?)...

It's on my list (the Sigma) but probably around Santa's time...:cool:

Hey not really rich, but addicted. The good thing is that lens do not depreciate as much as smartphones or other must have electronics. So I avoid buying those trends, so I can afford lens that I can resell without too much hurt. But yeah, I cant wait to compare. I did once owned the 35L and the sig35 all at once. But eventually I decided to let go my 35L because someone offered me more money than I had bought it for. Buy smart, and you don't have to be rich.


5Diii | 50D | 8-15L 4| 16-35L 2.8 II| 24-70L 2.8 II | 70-200L 2.8 IS II |Tamy 150-600 | Σ35Art 1.4 | 40 2.8 | Σ50Art 1.4 | 85L 1.2 II | 100 2.8 Macro | Helios 44-3 58mm f2.0 |Helios 40-1 85mm f1.5 | 1.4x & 2x teleconverters

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bobbyz
Cream of the Crop
20,506 posts
Likes: 3479
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
May 09, 2014 20:12 |  #7

Best way to compare is to own both at same time. I currently own 35L and sigma 35mm f1.4. Owned canon & sigma 50mm f1.4 for a while. Same with 100-400L and 400mm f5.6 or 5dmk3 and 6d.


Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
Sony A7rIV, , Tamron 28-200mm, Sigma 40mm f1.4 Art FE, Sony 85mm f1.8 FE, Sigma 105mm f1.4 Art FE
Fuji GFX50s, 23mm f4, 32-64mm, 45mm f2.8, 110mm f2, 120mm f4 macro
Canon 24mm TSE-II, 85mm f1.2 L II, 90mm TSE-II Macro, 300mm f2.8 IS I

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
msowsun
"approx 8mm"
Avatar
9,317 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 416
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Peterborough Ont. Canada
     
May 10, 2014 14:17 |  #8

The new lens is much better than the old lens, and almost any lens ever made.....

You can see a direct side by side comparison here: http://www.dpreview.co​m …version2=0&fl2=​50&av2=1.4 (external link)

And here: http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=0​&APIComp=0 (external link)


Mike Sowsun / SL1 / 80D / EF-S 24mm STM / EF-S 10-18mm STM / EF-S 18-55mm STM / EF-S 15-85mm USM / EF-S 55-250mm STM / 5D3 / Samyang 14mm 2.8 / EF 40mm 2.8 STM / EF 50mm 1.4 USM / EF 100mm 2.0 USM / EF 100mm 2.8 USM Macro / EF 24-105mm IS / EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS Mk II / EF 100-400 II / EF 1.4x II
Full Current and Previously Owned Gear List over 40 years Flickr Photostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
snake0ape
Goldmember
Avatar
1,223 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Los Angeles
     
May 10, 2014 14:46 |  #9

msowsun wrote in post #16895323 (external link)
The new lens is much better than the old lens, and almost any lens ever made.....

You can see a direct side by side comparison here: http://www.dpreview.co​m …version2=0&fl2=​50&av2=1.4 (external link)

And here: http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=0​&APIComp=0 (external link)

Sure, technically it's a sharper and is a near flawless lens. But what gives the desired rendering qualities for the 50l and old sigma are it's optical flaws. So it might be worth keeping both 50s.


5Diii | 50D | 8-15L 4| 16-35L 2.8 II| 24-70L 2.8 II | 70-200L 2.8 IS II |Tamy 150-600 | Σ35Art 1.4 | 40 2.8 | Σ50Art 1.4 | 85L 1.2 II | 100 2.8 Macro | Helios 44-3 58mm f2.0 |Helios 40-1 85mm f1.5 | 1.4x & 2x teleconverters

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EverydayGetaway
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,008 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 5398
Joined Oct 2012
Location: GA Mountains
     
May 10, 2014 16:29 |  #10

HansSteinert wrote in post #16893466 (external link)
So I've been reading a lot of posts about the new Siggy. How's it stack up against it's cheaper brother? I have the old one and have always been happy with it, anybody done any side by side comparisons with the two?

If you're happy with the old one, why upgrade? Or are you just curious (if so, don't you know that's dangerous ;))?


Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
flickr (external link) // Instagram (external link)www.LucasGPhoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,520 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
New Sigma 50mm f1.4 ART vs old Sigma 50mm f1.4
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
569 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.