16-35mm f/4L IS is here!

Flickr.
500PX
Twitter
Tumblr

It's the same height as the 24-70 II, but thankfully feels as light as the 17-40.

Loving the new wave of Canon quality zooms.

Pic shows 24-70 II next to it.

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Edit: They sure were generous in the grip for the focus ring - so much room.

danielmedini.com
http://facebook.com/da​nielmediniphoto
5D III + 16-35 F4 + 24-70 II + 70-200 F4

-Steve
Facebook
Flickr

Savethemoment wrote in post #16988838
At last!! An iPhone pic from the bus stop, sorry if it's huge I haven't attached photos here before so am not sure how it will show on the screen.

Digidirect Sydney didn't have it in store, except (I think) for pre-order clients, so I went around the corner to Georges where they had unpacked 30 of this lens today. What was left of that 30 were stacked behind the counter and it looked as if they'd been going fast.. someone else was buying his too as I was paying.

Anyway I'm thrilled!! Unfortunately it's dark by 5pm in Sydney at this time of year and I have to work all week, so there won't be much chance to play with it in daylight until Saturday.

My gear is soooo far ahead of my skills that it's not funny. But I'm happy

Good luck with all your orders and unboxing!!

Hmmm a silver and black box art. I though Canon liked while and black...lol!

Regards, Gareth Cooper GMCPhotographics
"If youre happy and honest and fulfilled in what you do, then youҒre having a successful life" (Ben Elton)
Gear List GMCPhotographics

AtSea wrote in post #16988847
It's the same height as the 24-70 II, but thankfully feels as light as the 17-40.

Loving the new wave of Canon quality zooms.

Pic shows 24-70 II next to it.

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Edit: They sure were generous in the grip for the focus ring - so much room.

A nice pair for sure. I see you have a "anti-duck" frisby fitted to your 24-70IIL...made by Hoya.

Regards, Gareth Cooper GMCPhotographics
"If youre happy and honest and fulfilled in what you do, then youҒre having a successful life" (Ben Elton)
Gear List GMCPhotographics

Made a pit stop on the way to the office

[/URL]

focalpointsphoto.com - flickr - Instagram
α7ʀIV - α7ʀIII
Sigma 14-24 f2.8 ART - Zeiss Loxia 21 - Sigma 35 f1.2 ART - Sony 35 1.8 - Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8 - Sony 85GM

MattD wrote in post #16988842
Did you guys see this?

http://www.philaphoto.​com/images/16-35_Test_series.jpg

better corner detail then the 17MM TS-E. And wipes the floor with the 16-35 f2.8

that 16-36 F2.8 looks decentered. one corner is much softer than the other. The right corner is pretty close when stopped down, but the left is really bad.

Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

David
5Dc, 5Dii, Canon 16-35 f/4L IS, 40/2.8 Pancake, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 Macro, 135/2.0L, 200/2.8L, converted 35mm TS, Sigma 50/2.8 Macro, 70/2.8 Macro, Zeiss ZE 21/2.8, Zeiss Contax 28/2.8, 50/1.7 & 85/2.8, Jena 135/3.5, Voigtlander 90mm f/3.5 APO, Canon 28-135.

2ndviolinman wrote in post #16989231
Aren't those Left Corner and Center crops?
I don't see anything for Right Corner.

the second set of corners is the right corner, based on the full image below.

Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

mystik610 wrote in post #16989175
Made a pit stop on the way to the office

[/URL]

..

Image hosted by forum (688380) © StudioAbe [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

If it's in focus, it's pornography, if it's out of focus, it's art.
EOS R5 & 5DsR | + gear | StudioAbe | Facebook

mystik610 wrote in post #16989175
Made a pit stop on the way to the office

sounds like you'll be having an unproductive day at the office.

Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

Charlie wrote in post #16989233
the second set of corners is the right corner, based on the full image below.

But above the first set of crops at ways "Wide" and above the second set of crops it says "Tele", and the second set of crops comes from an area of the full frame shot that is a good 30% of the way in toward the center from the upper right corner, so the full frame shot looks to be a representation of the full scene and not the frame that the "Tele" corner crops were actually taken from.

Maybe?

David
5Dc, 5Dii, Canon 16-35 f/4L IS, 40/2.8 Pancake, 85/1.8, 100/2.8 Macro, 135/2.0L, 200/2.8L, converted 35mm TS, Sigma 50/2.8 Macro, 70/2.8 Macro, Zeiss ZE 21/2.8, Zeiss Contax 28/2.8, 50/1.7 & 85/2.8, Jena 135/3.5, Voigtlander 90mm f/3.5 APO, Canon 28-135.

2ndviolinman wrote in post #16989666
But above the first set of crops at ways "Wide" and above the second set of crops it says "Tele", and the second set of crops comes from an area of the full frame shot that is a good 30% of the way in toward the center from the upper right corner, so the full frame shot looks to be a representation of the full scene and not the frame that the "Tele" corner crops were actually taken from.

Maybe?

I missed the wide and tele.

I dont own the 16-35F2.8 and just assumed the wide was stronger than the tele, so I had to do a double take on the results. The test is somewhat confusing not showing both full images.

Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

6D | 70D | 24-105 L IS | 17-40 L | 300 F4 L IS | 50 1.8 II | 1.4x II | LR5 | HV30 | bug spray | wilderness
Gallatin National Forest, Montana/Lassen Volcanic NP Campgrounds

Charlie wrote in post #16989724
I missed the wide and tele.

I dont own the 16-35F2.8 and just assumed the wide was stronger than the tele, so I had to do a double take on the results. The test is somewhat confusing not showing both full images.

It is odd, I would like to see the entire image also.

On my 16-35 2.8 II, while the corners at f8 are not as tack sharp as the centre, they are still quite detailed and sharp enough. But that example makes it look horrendous which is in my opinion, not a true representation.

1Dx | 5D III | 1D IV | 8-15 | 16-35L II | 24-70L II | 70-200L II | 400L II | 1.4x III | Σ85 | 100L | 3 x 600EX-RT | ST-E3-RT
website facebook