Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 12 Feb 2006 (Sunday) 22:16
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

monitor calibration

 
rosco1971
Senior Member
Avatar
454 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 237
Joined Mar 2005
Location: TORONTO,ONTARIO
     
Feb 12, 2006 22:16 |  #1

I purchased monitor calibration software (colourvision Spyder2). It made a huge difference in color but there is only one thing.....when i open photos in photo shop and lets say i convert photos to blk and wht, i can greys to not mix smoothly......its like i can see were the tones change from light gray to dark gray to blk....i do not know if that makes sense to anyone but is that because my monitor cannot handle the color or something or maybe the video card?.


Canon EOS R,CANON 5D, EF17-40MM f4L,EF85MM F1.8 , Sigma 50MM F1.4 , 70-200MM F2.8, RF35MM F1.8, EF100MM F2.8 USM L.,kenko pro 300 1.4 teleconverter
http://rossano1971.dev​iantart.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Feb 13, 2006 00:09 |  #2

What you are describing sounds like posterization, which is a term that describes the lack of smooth change in tone over an area. It jumps in clearly defined steps from one tone to the next so that it looks like each region was painted from a different bottle of paint.

That should not happen as a result of calibrating a monitor. That would happen if the image has been manipulated in such a way that the areas of low detail have been artificially expanded (as in greater contrast), and it can also happen as a result of too much JPG compression.


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jj1987
Goldmember
1,398 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Florida
     
Feb 13, 2006 00:19 as a reply to  @ Robert_Lay's post |  #3

Robert_Lay wrote:
That should not happen as a result of calibrating a monitor.

right and wrong. It will not happen from callibrating the monitor, but can definatly happen if the spyder made a bad profile of the monitor.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Robert_Lay
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,546 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA
     
Feb 13, 2006 08:50 as a reply to  @ jj1987's post |  #4

jj1987 wrote:
right and wrong. It will not happen from callibrating the monitor, but can definatly happen if the spyder made a bad profile of the monitor.

In my mind, making a good/bad profile and calibrating the monitor are one and the same thing - it's just a question of whether or not it works - so, in that sense the calibration can cause the problem. The mystery would be, why does it only affect his B&W work, and not his color work?


Bob
Quality of Light (external link), Photo Tool ver 2.0 (external link)
Canon Rebel XTi; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-f/5.6 USM; EF-S 18-55 mm f/3.5-f/5.6; EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM; EF 50mm f/1.4 USM; Canon Powershot G5; Canon AE1(2); Leica R4s; Battery Grip BG-E3; Pentax Digital Spotmeter with Zone VI Mod & Calibration.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jj1987
Goldmember
1,398 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Florida
     
Feb 13, 2006 08:59 as a reply to  @ Robert_Lay's post |  #5

Robert_Lay wrote:
In my mind, making a good/bad profile and calibrating the monitor are one and the same thing - it's just a question of whether or not it works - so, in that sense the calibration can cause the problem. The mystery would be, why does it only affect his B&W work, and not his color work?

quite possibly because the tonality of B&W is so important to the image that this is the first time its noticed.

When working at the lab, we would make custom profiles for a machine, and anything with gradients is where the profiles would fail if they were incorrect.

I suggest doing a perfict black and white gradient strip in photoshop (lets say 2in x 24) and then run the posterize filter over it with 25 steps, giving you a 25step greyscale. If you see that two or more of these steps are the same tone, theres something funny with your monitor. If you see it in the gradient before the posterize feature, thtats a more clear sign there's something wrong.

but, usually this shoes up in B&W because if the tonality importance over color, and in sunsets with bright gradients.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,006 views & 0 likes for this thread, 3 members have posted to it.
monitor calibration
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2459 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.