Where did these two distances come from? Are you supposed to microadjust using the longer distance if you plan to shoot landscapes, and the shorter if you are doing portraits or still lifes? I don't understand how those distances came about.
tvphotog Cream of the Crop More info | May 15, 2014 22:30 | #1 Where did these two distances come from? Are you supposed to microadjust using the longer distance if you plan to shoot landscapes, and the shorter if you are doing portraits or still lifes? I don't understand how those distances came about. Jay
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 16, 2014 05:18 | #2 Canon recommends 50x. I'd always thought it was to ensure that there's enough depth of field to make it easier to get a consistent MFA value. Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Wilt Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1] More info | May 16, 2014 06:13 | #3 The Canon article on this topic http://www.learn.usa.canon.com …oadjustment_article.shtml "The adjustments applied using this control are based on the depth-of-field you'd have at a lens's maximum aperture. They are not based on the lens's focal length! When setting the Microadjustment, you'll see a scale on the camera's LCD monitor with up to + or - twenty steps. Each step is a very fine increment, equal to 1/8th of the depth-of-field you'd have with the current lens wide-open. And that 1/8th of the depth of field is only moving forward (toward the camera) or back (toward the background) from the sharpest plane of focus. The main thing to remember here is that these are very fine increments. "
"Use Live View to manually focus on a stationary, flat, high-contrast object that is at the center of the viewfinder and parallel to the plane of focus. The camera-to-subject distance should be no less than 50 times the focal length of the lens. For a 50mm lens this would be at least 2.5 meters, or approximately 8.2 feet." So Canon itself does not seem consistent in its recommendations! After all, 50X is not the same as "at the distances you typically use them". But to Canon's defense, they do state " no less than 50 times the focal length" "For EOS AF points, there are two levels of precision - 'normal' which is within one depth of focus for the attached lens at max aperture, and 'high precision' which is within 1/3 of the depth of focus for the attached lens at max aperture." I decided to create a spreadsheet looking at some of these distances, in an effort to reverse engineer 'Canon logic' (isn't that another oxymoron that we have discovered?! You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1014 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||