Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 18 May 2014 (Sunday) 19:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Frustrating Exposure Today

 
alexxn
Senior Member
Avatar
396 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2011
Location: S Florida
     
May 18, 2014 19:37 |  #1

So I was out at the lake this afternoon, bright sunny day, trying to shoot some jetskiiers. Sun was directly overhead. Shooting with a 70-200 f/2.8 in AV mode, aperture at f/5.6, ISO200 (to keep the shutter speed high), EC at between +3/4 to +1 stop.

No matter what I tried my subjects were dark with an exposed or slightly overexposed background. I tried both Evaluative and Spot Metering, same results.

Obviously there would be some shadows but what gives here ?

I usually don't encounter this to as much of an extreme as today.

Any thoughts ?


Nikon D4S, D3, Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4G, Nikkor AF-S 85 f/1.8G, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G E VR II
www.alexnikolis.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
May 18, 2014 19:52 |  #2

Heya,

It was just too bright and even in spot metering (because evaluative here is definitely the opposite of what you'd want to use for metering), probably very bright, so it turned those super bright highlights into the 50% grey or whatever, and that resulted in the overall image being much darker in terms of exposure, due to the highlights being super bright. Bad conditions really. You could try a CPL. I would have checked via live view to see the histogram and checked my overall exposure that way, and shot in manual once I knew my minimum shutter speed and aperture for what I wanted, and used ISO to increase exposure from there. LiveView is a great tool for moments like this, to see what the exposure is going to be like as a whole image, as Canon's meters (in my experience) under expose all the time.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
May 18, 2014 20:07 |  #3

I would have shot in M just because you probably won't need to fool with the exposure much shot to shot after you are set. Sometimes it is easier to just do it yourself if the conditions aren't really changing fast (clouds moving overhead).
Go into LV, set your exposure, click out of LV and fire away :)


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
May 18, 2014 20:30 |  #4

With a clear sky/sunny day, when shooting facing in a particular direction, I'll typically use Manual exposure, Spot meter the blue sky, and set the exposure to +1EV. This will give the sky a nice light blue and should do good with subjects that are getting decent light, although shadows can be of course challenging (so I've shot such things in Raw).

If there are white clouds in the sky or areas with bright highlights, I'd double-check to make sure highlights are not being blown. But as a "rule of thumb" setting a blue sky to +1EV works quite well for me, not so bright as to blow things out. Frothing white-water may be a bit much, tame it in a Raw processor, but the overall results can be good.

If you change directions (in relation to the sun and the subjects) you then want to adjust your exposure accordingly.

If the light changes (such as clouds or the action going into shadowy areas) you also would want to adjust. Some people prefer Av or Tv for scenes with changing light.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
N2bnfunn
Senior Member
Avatar
767 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 87
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Richmond Virginia
     
May 18, 2014 22:13 |  #5

Next time try this, shoot in Manual mode use a 5/6 F stop ISO around 200 to 400 shutter around 200 to 320 and use meter mode to the adjustment.
Or better still trying auto ISO using 5/6 F stop.


Canon EOS R EF 70-200 L 2.8 L 24-70 2.8L II Canon Pixma PRO-1 3 Canon 600EX-RT Speedlites

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ScubaDude
Goldmember
Avatar
1,104 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Waveland, MS
     
May 18, 2014 22:36 |  #6
bannedPermanent ban

Sounds like you needed more EC. Here's a shot I took at an outdoor concert, looking almost directly into the sun. I'd take a shot, preview it, and adjust the EC. Ended up with the EC cranked up to +3. Sometimes you just have to expose for the subject and don't worry about the background.

IMAGE: https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2923/14032163460_819e3e2ca0_o.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/nnYv​jL  (external link) 4004_small (external link) by ScubaDude1960 (external link), on Flickr

Canon [7D & BG-E7 grip] [T1i & BG-E5 grip] [400mm f/5.6L] [50mm f/1.8 II] [18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS]
Induro [AT313 tripod] [AM25 monopod] [GHB2 gimbal head]
My Flickr page (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,726 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 677
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
May 19, 2014 00:57 as a reply to  @ ScubaDude's post |  #7

Good example. You have to make up your mind about what's important, expose that properly and then if the highlights are blown to kingdom come, so be it.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vk2gwk
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
13,360 posts
Gallery: 332 photos
Likes: 1836
Joined Jun 2009
Location: One Mile Beach, NSW 2316, Australia
     
May 19, 2014 01:09 |  #8

apersson850 wrote in post #16914113 (external link)
Good example. You have to make up your mind about what's important, expose that properly and then if the highlights are blown to kingdom come, so be it.

Right, unless you can use fill flash.


My name is Henk. and I believe "It is all in the eye of the beholder....."
Image Editing is allowed. Please explain what you did!
Canon R5, R,, RF24-105/1:4 + RF70-200mm F/2.8 + RF15-35mm F/2.8 + 50mm 1.4 USM + Sigma 150-600mm Sports + RF100mm F/2.8 + GODOX V860 IIC+ 430EX + YN568EXII, triggers, reflectors, umbrellas and some more bits and pieces...
Photos on: Flickr! (external link) and on my own web site. (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
apersson850
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,726 posts
Gallery: 35 photos
Likes: 677
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Traryd, Sweden
     
May 19, 2014 03:38 as a reply to  @ vk2gwk's post |  #9

Of course, but he talked about "jetskiers", and I envision those to be out of flash range. But I may be wrong there.


Anders

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alexxn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
396 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2011
Location: S Florida
     
May 19, 2014 05:53 |  #10

apersson850 wrote in post #16914271 (external link)
Of course, but he talked about "jetskiers", and I envision those to be out of flash range. But I may be wrong there.

Yes there's no way I could use fill flash unfortunately because of the distance :(


Nikon D4S, D3, Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4G, Nikkor AF-S 85 f/1.8G, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G E VR II
www.alexnikolis.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alexxn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
396 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2011
Location: S Florida
     
May 19, 2014 06:26 |  #11

MalVeauX wrote in post #16913687 (external link)
Heya,

It was just too bright and even in spot metering (because evaluative here is definitely the opposite of what you'd want to use for metering), probably very bright, so it turned those super bright highlights into the 50% grey or whatever, and that resulted in the overall image being much darker in terms of exposure, due to the highlights being super bright. Bad conditions really. You could try a CPL. I would have checked via live view to see the histogram and checked my overall exposure that way, and shot in manual once I knew my minimum shutter speed and aperture for what I wanted, and used ISO to increase exposure from there. LiveView is a great tool for moments like this, to see what the exposure is going to be like as a whole image, as Canon's meters (in my experience) under expose all the time.

Very best,

So if not Evaluative metering then what ?


Nikon D4S, D3, Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4G, Nikkor AF-S 85 f/1.8G, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G E VR II
www.alexnikolis.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I like a long knob
7,515 posts
Gallery: 185 photos
Likes: 6392
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
May 19, 2014 07:23 |  #12

alexxn wrote in post #16914432 (external link)
So if not Evaluative metering then what ?

Manual!
You said sun was overhead. Therefore I will call that consistent light.
So just take photos in any mode until you get desired exposure.
Then stick to that exposure.


Dave
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alexxn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
396 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2011
Location: S Florida
     
May 19, 2014 07:26 |  #13

Choderboy wrote in post #16914496 (external link)
Manual!
You said sun was overhead. Therefore I will call that consistent light.
So just take photos in any mode until you get desired exposure.
Then stick to that exposure.

I'm thinking manual for sure now, I don't know how something like that could have escaped me like that. Oh well live and learn !


Nikon D4S, D3, Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4G, Nikkor AF-S 85 f/1.8G, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G E VR II
www.alexnikolis.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
May 19, 2014 07:29 |  #14

alexxn wrote in post #16914432 (external link)
So if not Evaluative metering then what ?

Heya,

Fully manual. Evaluative will not do that shot right, hardly ever. There's too many really bright highlights probably blown out, and dark shadow points. So when it meters all of that, as it meters the whole thing in evaluative, it will base it on that bright blow out stuff and you get a really dark underexposed photo. Spot metering and center weighted metering would work better. But even then probably not do the best (such as you found out spot metering doesn't help either there, it's not backlit, it's just overhead noon sun, which is the worst sun there is for light). So at that point you manually expose for what you want to see. Adjust things based on LiveView and Histogram. Don't trust the meter.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alexxn
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
396 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Nov 2011
Location: S Florida
     
May 19, 2014 07:41 |  #15

Thanks everyone !


Nikon D4S, D3, Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4G, Nikkor AF-S 85 f/1.8G, Nikon AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8 G ED, Nikkor AF-S 70-200 f/2.8G E VR II
www.alexnikolis.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,184 views & 0 likes for this thread, 19 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Frustrating Exposure Today
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
1263 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.