Just reposting what canonpricewatch posted 
http://www.ebay.com …43&lgeo=1&vectorid=229466![]()
LostViet408 Senior Member 331 posts Likes: 3 Joined Apr 2012 Location: San Jose More info | May 21, 2014 22:34 | #1 Just reposting what canonpricewatch posted
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 21, 2014 22:35 | #2 Would love to have that lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
What's the better lens. This or the canon 1.8 Had a 6D....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mpix345 Goldmember 2,870 posts Likes: 69 Joined Dec 2006 More info | May 22, 2014 00:01 | #4 oahumike wrote in post #16921550 What's the better lens. This or the canon 1.8 The Bell+Howell is manual focus only, but if that doesn't matter to you I think you would be very happy with it vs the 85/1.8. Faster, cheaper, great IQ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KirkS518 Goldmember 3,983 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2012 Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh More info | May 22, 2014 11:34 | #5 ^ Not to mention a lot less CA If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 22, 2014 14:20 | #6 A lens sample thread for this manual lens KirkS518 wrote in post #16922432 ^ Not to mention a lot less CA CA is easy to fix on the 85L in lightroom & CR. Well, I've had no problem making corrections.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | May 23, 2014 12:42 | #7 oahumike wrote in post #16921550 What's the better lens. This or the canon 1.8 Most people would be happier with the Canon. But this one is a 2/3 a stop faster and 2/3 the price of a used Canon 85mm. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KirkS518 Goldmember 3,983 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2012 Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh More info | May 23, 2014 13:27 | #8 spotz04 wrote in post #16922794 A lens sample thread for this manual lens https://photography-on-the.net …=781777&highlight=Rokinon CA is easy to fix on the 85L in lightroom & CR. Well, I've had no problem making corrections. ![]() True, but IMO, it shouldn't be a step that's necessary. It's just my pet peeve about the lens (and I own it). If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | May 23, 2014 14:13 | #9 KirkS518 wrote in post #16925043 True, but IMO, it shouldn't be a step that's necessary. It's just my pet peeve about the lens (and I own it). It was designed for film 25 years ago. The Purple fringe didn't happen nearly as bad on film. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ptcanon3ti Cream of the Crop More info | May 23, 2014 15:55 | #10 I wish was for the 14mm 2.8. Paul
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1670 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||