truecolors wrote in post #16927938
Thank you all. I did not know that changing the resolution was not necessary. I had been
told to do that by someone that was taking a photography class at college. I figured he knew what he was talking about and never questioned it. Thanks for the info.
OK, Sheron, there are two things you mentioned in your original post, first being to resize the image to get the file size smaller, then to change the ppi resolution.
I believe that both of those points have been addressed here, first that when you resize the image you are "throwing away" pixels and so image resolution, and for most of us that's not how we prefer to work with our digital images, and second as to changing the ppi value that is meaningless when processing your digital photos, and unless you are preparing it for some very specific uses then you don't need to bother.
A couple things:
As to resizing the image to get the file size down, well, that's typically in the last stage of your processing where you are putting out an image to be "shared", such as posting to a Web site (such as POTN) or emailing/giving it to someone to view on a computer, or, alternatively, if you are preparing to print the image at a given size and you might want to resize it at a specific size (where you may in fact want to set a ppi value such as 300ppi (pixels for inch) for a specific prints size, so in the Resize dialog you specify your image size as, for example, 12 inches x 18 inches (your planned print size) and set the ppi figure to 300 ppi, say, because that is considered a "high quality" resolution. That produces an image of 3600x5400 pixels, which will be resized from your original
It should be said, though, that when you do something like that you should "preserve" your original. You want to use "Save As" or "Save for Web", creating a separate file from your original, don't use "Save" or your original will be overwritten by the changed image/file.
As to whether it might be "better" to go ahead and resize to create a smaller file, or maybe to lower the Quality of your image for that purpose if your original is a jpeg (not a Raw) well, for some scenarios, sure, it could be feasible, if, for example you are shooting/processing for a very specific "task" where having the best possible image is not wanted/needed, but having a smaller file size is in fact wanted/needed, but for most of us we prefer to work with the highest resolution/image quality until we a ready to output an image at whatever size/resolution and Quality setting we desire for a specific need, and like I said, we will tend to keep the original file/image on hand, whether it be jpeg or the original Raw image.
Then, what your friend who is taking a class mentioned: Did he only advise you to change the ppi "tag" to 350 ppi, or was he advising you to actually resize the image, using 350ppi as the "working" resolution?
I'm asking because there is an old "standard" of having images with a "tag" of around that resolution, the more common value being 300 ppi, but also, as I mentioned, part of your final process if you are preparing to print an image can if you wish be to resize the image with a high ppi working resolution, but I'd do that after your processing is done at the "native" resolution. Then, when done with your basic processing you can resize, and Save As, although some folks like to apply some sharpening, called Output Sharpening, to their images after resizing so that the sharpening will "fit" the resized image.