Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 28 May 2014 (Wednesday) 16:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

POST YOUR HEADSHOTS!

 
Brian_R
Goldmember
2,656 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Aug 2010
     
Feb 18, 2015 19:48 |  #406

totally agree with hurley's tip. that first shot stands out. pretty much any advice he shares is great as he has quite the mastery of headshot photography :-D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisNL
Senior Member
Avatar
578 posts
Gallery: 76 photos
Likes: 925
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
     
Feb 18, 2015 19:58 as a reply to  @ Brian_R's post |  #407

Yes...she felt weird doing it, but I assured her it would come out looking more natural than it felt.


Two Canon 5D MKIII's w/ Canon 17-40, Canon 70-200L 2.8 II (w/ 2x extender), Sigma 24-35 ART, Sigma 50 ART, Canon flashes.
www.chrisledrewphotogr​aphy.com (external link)
www.facebook.com/chris​ledrewphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
     
Feb 18, 2015 20:35 |  #408
bannedPermanent ban

I find her forehead too big in the first shot, and she doesn't have a large forehead. I'd not use this technique with someone like Barbara DeRossi (external link).


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisNL
Senior Member
Avatar
578 posts
Gallery: 76 photos
Likes: 925
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
     
Feb 18, 2015 20:36 as a reply to  @ Alveric's post |  #409

Hmmm...good eye....I find it too high in the second one.


Two Canon 5D MKIII's w/ Canon 17-40, Canon 70-200L 2.8 II (w/ 2x extender), Sigma 24-35 ART, Sigma 50 ART, Canon flashes.
www.chrisledrewphotogr​aphy.com (external link)
www.facebook.com/chris​ledrewphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by Alveric. (4 edits in all)
     
Feb 18, 2015 20:50 |  #410
bannedPermanent ban

What you did is actually quite neat. It's a very illustrative comparison that you can use even with your clients.

One of the things that is asked in the consutation is, 'is there anything you feel uncomfortable with, in terms of your features?' Better worded of course, but if asked people will tell you that they're concerned about a double chin, or certain wrinkles, &c. Armed with this you put together your shooting approach, i.e. the techniques you will use with that particular subject.

Going back to your comparison, you can see the following:

#1:

  • The forehead looks larger –because it's closer to the lens. Careful here, if you're using wide angle lenses or normal ones.
  • The nose looks longer, but the nostrils look small.
  • The neck looks shorter.
  • The jaw looks smaller –ergo, not the pose to use with subjects with weaker jaws.

Conversely, in #2:
  • The forehead looks smaller –it's farther away from the lens.
  • The jaw looks more prominent –predictable, as it's closer to the lens.
  • The nose looks shorter, and the nostrils look larger.
  • The neck looks longer –good for subjects with shorter necks, or if you just wanna make the neck look more fetching.
  • The subject looks a wee bit more aloof –aloofness is directly proportional to lowering the camera position.

See what I mean about studying the subject and using the tools accordingly?

Essentially, Mr Hurley's approach is a whole set of tools that you use sometimes all together, sometimes individually. The pushing of the jaw forward might make some subjects look fantastic, yet it might make others look affected with prognathism.

'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisNL
Senior Member
Avatar
578 posts
Gallery: 76 photos
Likes: 925
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by ChrisNL.
     
Feb 18, 2015 22:28 as a reply to  @ Alveric's post |  #411

I like this analysis and see what you're saying. No single rule will apply to all situations and facial features. Point well taken, thanks!

Hurley does mention that he stopped asking clients to move their jaw forward for the exact reason you mentioned above. He now asks to have them move their foreheads toward the camera, which creates a more subtle effect.


Two Canon 5D MKIII's w/ Canon 17-40, Canon 70-200L 2.8 II (w/ 2x extender), Sigma 24-35 ART, Sigma 50 ART, Canon flashes.
www.chrisledrewphotogr​aphy.com (external link)
www.facebook.com/chris​ledrewphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alveric
Goldmember
Avatar
4,598 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Likes: 1061
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canada
Post edited over 8 years ago by Alveric.
     
Feb 19, 2015 00:32 |  #412
bannedPermanent ban

ChrisNL wrote in post #17438475 (external link)
I like this analysis and see what you're saying. No single rule will apply to all situations and facial features. Point well taken, thanks!

Hurley does mention that he stopped asking clients to move their jaw forward for the exact reason you mentioned above. He now asks to have them move their foreheads toward the camera, which creates a more subtle effect.

Now, this is mere speculation on my part, but I wonder if the frontal tilt is one of the reasons why Mr Hurley crops the top of their heads from the frame. I've no vict... er, model with whom to experiment regarding this point, but maybe you can ( :p ): my take is that leaning into the camera would enlarge your crown real state, especially if you're shooting from a high angle –this would be an issue with Asian people, due to the natural shape of their skulls. In such conditions, cropping the top would ameliorate this problem.

Again, I'm just picturing things in my head: I've no evidence nor experience to back this theory.


'The success of the second-rate is deplorable in itself; but it is more deplorable in that it very often obscures the genuine masterpiece. If the crowd runs after the false, it must neglect the true.' —Arthur Machen
Why 'The Histogram' Sux (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TTUShooter
Senior Member
Avatar
378 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Likes: 126
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Post edited over 8 years ago by TTUShooter. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 19, 2015 10:16 as a reply to  @ Alveric's post |  #413

Some Employee of the month shots i took for my job. pretty basic stuff, but i think they look good for their purpose

IMAGE: https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3908/14586715866_1acbb4caef_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/odYJ​r9  (external link) Employee of the Month (external link) by jschneider928 (external link), on Flickr

IMAGE: https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7521/15661164740_90a0204f4a_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/pRVy​DJ  (external link) EOTM (external link) by jschneider928 (external link), on Flickr

Cameras: EOS 7d mark II, Fuji X100F, Leica M8, Leica M2-R,
Lenses: A Whole mess of them.
My flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eric ­ Redard
Senior Member
Avatar
478 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Salem, NH
     
Feb 19, 2015 15:44 |  #414

Alveric wrote in post #17438646 (external link)
Now, this is mere speculation on my part, but I wonder if the frontal tilt is one of the reasons why Mr Hurley crops the top of their heads from the frame. I've no vict... er, model with whom to experiment regarding this point, but maybe you can ( :p ): my take is that leaning into the camera would enlarge your crown real state, especially if you're shooting from a high angle –this would be an issue with Asian people, due to the natural shape of their skulls. In such conditions, cropping the top would ameliorate this problem.

Again, I'm just picturing things in my head: I've no evidence nor experience to back this theory.

I love Peter Hurley's style, his lighting, and the way he can direct whom ever he is photographing. I have watched the YouTube video many times. What I've taken away from it is his composition (putting people close to the facing edge) and his crop (which I was doing before).

I have tried the head tilt, the jaw thing and 'the squinch.' I'm happy it works for him and he gets great images from it but the images I get are of people laughing hysterically... which actually relaxes them for the rest of the images. I encourage everyone to look at other's techniques and see what works for them. It's more satisfying developing your own style for your own purposes rather than getting frustrated by imitating someone else.

There's nothing like having your own style and being happy with it, regardless of what other's think.


Capturing The Spirit
Canon 5D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shiftmys6
Member
Avatar
123 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Jan 2010
Location: by Seattle wa
     
Feb 20, 2015 06:14 |  #415

here is a photo of Lilly, with a 5d 70-200mm

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/02/3/LQ_713943.jpg
Image hosted by forum (713943) © shiftmys6 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon 6d 24-105mm f/4L IS 50mm f/1.4, 70-200 f/4l is usm,Tripod Manfrotto P55xPROB - Head Manfrotto 808RC4 3 Way Pan Head. flash speedlite 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RMH
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canterbury
Post edited over 8 years ago by RMH.
     
Feb 20, 2015 08:35 |  #416

Eric Redard wrote in post #17439581 (external link)
I love Peter Hurley's style, his lighting, and the way he can direct whom ever he is photographing. I have watched the YouTube video many times. What I've taken away from it is his composition (putting people close to the facing edge) and his crop (which I was doing before).

I have tried the head tilt, the jaw thing and 'the squinch.' I'm happy it works for him and he gets great images from it but the images I get are of people laughing hysterically... which actually relaxes them for the rest of the images. I encourage everyone to look at other's techniques and see what works for them. It's more satisfying developing your own style for your own purposes rather than getting frustrated by imitating someone else.

There's nothing like having your own style and being happy with it, regardless of what other's think.

Completely agree, everyone has to find what works for them; everyone is different and things that work for one person won't work for others.

And also, we all bring different things out of people with our different personalities, and we all need to learn how to fix whatever we bring out that's not desirable.

eg, I'm a big fan of Peters work, but the squinching thing has never worked for me, mostly because people just don't seem to stare at me wide-eyed when I take their photos.

I dunno why people do with peter and don't with me.. maybe cause I don't have 100watts of kinos in their face, or maybe cause I'm much more chilled than him, or maybe just because having me take their photo is not quite such an 'event' :lol: . Whatever it is, it's just not something I've had to ask people to do and when I have just to try it out it just looks silly and over the top.

Peter even says in one of his DVDs that he can only show you what works for him, and it's not going to work that way for everyone.

Having said that, it's a good technique to know and if someday someone does give me the dear in the headlights look, i'll be thinking "ah-ha, squinching time".



All the stuff I've owned at one time or another

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RMH
Goldmember
Avatar
1,000 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Canterbury
Post edited over 8 years ago by RMH. (2 edits in all)
     
Feb 21, 2015 20:26 |  #417

one from today

IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8664/16399925877_9b63bb56fc_o.jpg


All the stuff I've owned at one time or another

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JakAHearts
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,746 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 1528
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Silver Spring, MD
     
Feb 21, 2015 20:37 |  #418

IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8590/16564363972_67d77bb313_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/reJG​jh  (external link) IMG_5643 (external link) by shanereighard (external link), on Flickr

Shane
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Martin
Senior Member
717 posts
Gallery: 135 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1865
Joined Jul 2012
Location: Naperville, IL
Post edited over 8 years ago by Mike Martin.
     
Feb 22, 2015 09:57 |  #419

CC welcome. First attempt of a headshot with my son. I got a basic Cowboy studio umbrella set for Christmas along with a collapsible backdrop.

IMAGE: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8651/16405842397_9fe931d2d4_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/qZJe​nF  (external link) Max Martin (external link) by Mike M Martin (external link), on Flickr

Mike Martin: MMartinPhotography.com (external link)flickr (external link) 500px (external link)
Canon R5, Canon 80D, Tamron 35mm f/1.4, Sigma 50 1.4 EX, Canon 85mm f/1.8, Tamron 70-200 2.8 G2, Sigma 150-600 C, Godox AD200 x2, Flashpoint R2 Zoom x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ejphoto
Member
Avatar
46 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 105
Joined Feb 2015
     
Feb 22, 2015 15:37 |  #420

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2015/02/4/LQ_714314.jpg
Image hosted by forum (714314) © ejphoto [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,498,849 views & 35,895 likes for this thread, 843 members have posted to it and it is followed by 515 members.
POST YOUR HEADSHOTS!
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1324 guests, 165 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.