If other please specify.
| POLL: "Which is in your bag for wedding detail shots?" |
 Canon 100mm L | 41 52.6% |
| Canon 100mm Non- L | 11 14.1% |
| Canon 60mm | 2 2.6% |
| Canon 50mm | 2 2.6% |
| Canon 180mm | 1 1.3% |
| Other (Brand, normal lense + tube, etc.) | 21 26.9% |
LVMoose Moose gets blamed for everything.  More info | Jun 09, 2014 15:27 | #2 Oops, didn't see I was in the Weddings and Other Family Events Talk section. Answered the poll already. Moose
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson  More info |
memoriesoftomorrow Goldmember 3,846 posts Likes: 293 Joined Nov 2010 More info | Jun 09, 2014 18:32 | #5 Canon 100mm F2.8 L IS Macro. However I also use my 90mm F2.8 TS-E with an extension tube on it and I also use a 24mm F1.8 Sonar Zeiss on my Sony A7r which gets pretty darn close too. Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer  51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jun 10, 2014 00:44 | #6 Tubes. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jcolman Goldmember More info | Jun 10, 2014 16:06 | #8 |
jmikolich Senior Member  388 posts Likes: 7 Joined Feb 2013 Location: Ohio More info | Jun 10, 2014 16:10 | #9 100L but I also use it for portraits occasionally when my wife is in the way, I also never carry a tripod to a wedding -Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 10, 2014 16:25 | #10 jcolman wrote in post #16963774  Same here The lens is amazing !!!! A hidden gem.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vanmidd Member 216 posts Likes: 19 Joined Sep 2013 More info | Jun 11, 2014 07:50 | #11 100 L. Pretty poor for anything other than macro though. Van Middleton Photography - Byron Bay Wedding Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
clb Senior Member  302 posts Likes: 24 Joined Apr 2010 Location: Airdrie, Alberta, Cda. More info | Jun 11, 2014 08:29 | #12 Tamron 90mm Chuck
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LVMoose Moose gets blamed for everything. More info | Jun 11, 2014 10:29 | #13 vanmidd wrote in post #16964938 100 L. Pretty poor for anything other than macro though. What? It's not a bad focal length for portraits, and very sharp. Decent for just general photography on a FF. The only reason I don't use it more for that, is my 70-200 has that range covered, and is also very sharp. Moose
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CameraMan Cream of the Crop  More info | Jun 11, 2014 10:34 | #14 Tubes. I dont shoot that many macros to justify paing the money for a macro lens. Photographer
LOG IN TO REPLY |
willowrose Member  170 posts Likes: 22 Joined Jul 2012 More info | Jun 11, 2014 19:32 | #15 I shoot with the 50mm Canon compact connected, as needed, to the life size converter. I know some folks find the lens focus mechanism to be noisy, but so far I haven't scared away a single wedding ring yet. Canon 6D, &7D T1i, Canon 24-105L, 17-40L, 70-200 F4L IS, 50mmL, 135L, 200 2.8L, Sigma 50mm original, Tamron 150-600, some Lensbaby gear
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1501 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
