Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

Awesome capture^^. This thread keeps getting better for inspiration.

I do not have this lens but I must say that all the images posted on this thread are striking.

Classified wrote in post #18166566
This lens may not be the first choice when shooting sport with an ultrawide lens. But it's sharper than my 16-35/2.8 II and when the light is plentiful, this lens focuses fast and accurate. However, I tried using it during a hockey game and it's way slower to nail the focus than the f/2.8 II, at least combined with a 6D. I'm going to buy the 16-35 III and keep this lens (and perhaps the old II as a spare lens because an ultrawide is a really useful tool), for those times I'm out for fishing.

Hosted photo: posted by Classified in
./showthread.php?p=181​66566&i=i167537881
forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive

Then you'll have 3 16-35s Gotta love it! !

rafaelreisphotography wrote in post #18166887
Hello, guys. I'm trying to justify the higher price of canon 11-24mm f/4 ...... almost three times of 16-35mm f4. It is soooo pricey!

What do you think? 16mm it is wide enough for landscape? Anybody here thinking of buying the huge, pricey 11-24mm?

Becouse iam in really doubt on these bad boys.

Thanks for response.

I added the Tam 15-30, it sits by the 16-35/4. I did the wonderpana system for the Tam. If I ever go wider it will be the Sigma 12-24 ART if they ever put it out in a-mount. Agree with Martial, the 16-35 is wide wnoughefor 90%of anything I'd ever shoot and it is promo sharp, the huge draw to me on the Canon though is size and weight.

fplstudio wrote in post #18167318
just finished to process these two, twilight and sunrise shots

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/NpPL​Hu Nelson Bay twilight by Francesco Pecora Lauria, on Flickr

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/NpPP​dE Nelson Bay sunrise by Francesco Pecora Lauria, on Flickr

Outstanding work.

Great Stuff here.

I'm curious to see the 16-35 2.8 III but I will probably end up with the F4 IS as this years Xmas gift to me ;-}

Tommydigi wrote in post #18168637
Great Stuff here.

I'm curious to see the 16-35 2.8 III but I will probably end up with the F4 IS as this years Xmas gift to me ;-}

Tough call, man.. this f/4 IS is so useful as an all around lens, along with it being a stellar performer. But I too am curious to try out that new f/2.8 III!

Tommydigi wrote in post #18168637
Great Stuff here.

I'm curious to see the 16-35 2.8 III but I will probably end up with the F4 IS as this years Xmas gift to me ;-}

I too am buying the f/4 for Christmas, it will go well with my 1D4 .

Red Dexs wrote in post #18169219
I too am buying the f/4 for Christmas, it will go well with my 1D4 .

You won't regret it. It makes fools like me look good.

basketballfreak6 wrote in post #18169252

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/MFop​AT St Paul's Cathedral in Melbourne, Australia by Tony, on Flickr

Beautiful shot!

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/NvqQ​nT

corndog cabernet wrote in post #18166738
Bryce Cyn Utah

Hosted photo: posted by corndog cabernet in
./showthread.php?p=181​66738&i=i230242844
forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive

Great light and composition!

ShallowDoF wrote in post #18169259
Beautiful shot!

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/NvqQ​nT Boards by Aperture Blade, on Flickr

not bad yourself

MatthewK wrote in post #18168887
Tough call, man.. this f/4 IS is so useful as an all around lens, along with it being a stellar performer. But I too am curious to try out that new f/2.8 III!

The 2.8 is the only reason I am waiting but considering the cost for the stop I don't know. I would probably give up my 24L and I don't know if I want to do that. I had the 17-40 and I liked it so I'm sure either 16-35 will be an improvement. It is a tough call.

ShallowDoF wrote in post #18169259
Beautiful shot!

IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/NvqQ​nT Boards by Aperture Blade, on Flickr

Beautiful!