IS on this lens is amazing!!!... up to 1 second, no tripod... another reason to love more this lens!!! 
sway by Marcial Quintero, on Flickr
marcial4 Goldmember  More info | Apr 16, 2017 06:34 | #2071 IS on this lens is amazing!!!... up to 1 second, no tripod... another reason to love more this lens!!! sway by Marcial Quintero, on FlickrMarcial "Marshall" Quintero
LOG IN TO REPLY |
fplstudio Senior Member  More info | Apr 17, 2017 06:53 | #2072 10+ years with Canon, now new fresh air with Sony Full Frame
LOG IN TO REPLY |
marcial4 Goldmember More info | Apr 17, 2017 11:47 | #2073 |
Apr 18, 2017 11:11 | #2074 Larry20d wrote in post #18327100 How is the sharpness? I tend to print 13x19 and larger. Sharpness is very good. Not as sharp as the 16-35, but pretty dang good. Here's a Flickr album of real estate, all shot with the 10-18 and my EOS M if you want to have a look. 2 6D - 35 f1.4L, 135 f2L, 50 f1.8 STM, 85 f1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Larry20d Senior Member  287 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Reisterstown, Md More info | Apr 18, 2017 15:28 | #2075 BallerStatus wrote in post #18331163 Sharpness is very good. Not as sharp as the 16-35, but pretty dang good. Here's a Flickr album of real estate, all shot with the 10-18 and my EOS M if you want to have a look. https://flic.kr/s/aHskSwpcu1 Thanks. I took a peek at your Flickr album. The shots look fine on the computer. I am most concerned with the image quality of large prints. Thanks again for your post. 5D Mark III, Canon 80D,16-35L, 24-105L, 70-300L IS, 100-400L IS, Nifty 50 1.4, Canon 135L, Canon 85 1.8, Canon EFS 18-135, Canon 55-250, Sigma 150 Macro, EFS-18-135, Sigma 150-600 Contemporary, Extension Tubes, Canon G10
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I have a couple 24*36 prints from my 16-35 f4 and they are a smudge better than the 16-35 2.8 ii but it's really only in the corners and from up close. Made the Fuji Switch
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Larry20d Senior Member 287 posts Likes: 21 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Reisterstown, Md More info | Apr 18, 2017 16:29 | #2077 MysticFalcon wrote in post #18331373 I have a couple 24*36 prints from my 16-35 f4 and they are a smudge better than the 16-35 2.8 ii but it's really only in the corners and from up close.
5D Mark III, Canon 80D,16-35L, 24-105L, 70-300L IS, 100-400L IS, Nifty 50 1.4, Canon 135L, Canon 85 1.8, Canon EFS 18-135, Canon 55-250, Sigma 150 Macro, EFS-18-135, Sigma 150-600 Contemporary, Extension Tubes, Canon G10
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 18, 2017 23:24 | #2078 Salton Sea in monochromatic edit.  Salton Sea, Monochromatic by Ryan Luna, on Flickrhttp://RyanLunaPhotography.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BJ_Nguyen Senior Member  More info | Apr 19, 2017 01:46 | #2079 Maternity Session  Image hosted by forum (851421) © BJ_Nguyen [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
marcial4 Goldmember More info Post edited over 2 years ago by marcial4. | Apr 19, 2017 06:50 | #2080 |
Apr 19, 2017 14:03 | #2081 BJ_Nguyen wrote in post #18331796 Maternity Session 
 Hosted photo: posted by BJ_Nguyen in ./showthread.php?p=18331796&i=i172203879 forum: Lens Sample Photo Archive Nice shot! 5DII + 6D | 16-35/4.0L IS | Σ35/1.4A | 40/2.8 | Σ85/1.4A | 70-200/2.8L IS II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BJ_Nguyen Senior Member More info | Funny ! Sounded like I lied to you. But the true is Yes F.4 Sir.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 20, 2017 10:46 | #2083 Does anyone know if a 77mm to 82mm step up ring will fit inside the hood for this lens? Lake Superior and North Shore Landscape Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Apr 20, 2017 10:51 | #2084 MNUplander wrote in post #18332957 Does anyone know if a 77mm to 82mm step up ring will fit inside the hood for this lens? I have a really nice 82mm CPL and I'd prefer not to shell out for a 77mm CPL in addition to it. Honestly, I have not tried it myself, but considering that I have difficulty removing the lens cap when the hood is on, I'd say no. There really is no room, understandably so, otherwise it would defeat the purpose of the hood.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thanks for the info, the lens just isn't here yet so I had no point of reference. Lake Superior and North Shore Landscape Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
| x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is griggt 650 guests, 142 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
