Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 23 Jun 2014 (Monday) 08:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Noise

 
Northwoods ­ Bill
Goldmember
1,145 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 413
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jun 23, 2014 08:38 |  #1

I was asked last minute to shoot some images in church yesterday. I am not happy with the noise level in the image but I wonder if it is a result of pixel peeping. Anyway, I am curious what I could do different in processing this to get a better result. Any input would be most appreciated!

IMAGE: https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2935/14509101993_c2a5789d0d_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …hwoods_photo/14​509101993/  (external link)

Bill R
Web:https://www.flickr.com​/photos/whitebirch/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jun 23, 2014 09:02 |  #2

I am curious what I could do different in processing this

Hard to say what to do different without knowing what you did.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11004
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Jun 23, 2014 09:02 |  #3

What application are you using for image editing and/or noise reduction? I have and use several different apps for noise reduction. Some better than others. Imagenomic's "Noiseware" has been my favorite. I also really like Topaz DeNoise 5. And, of course, the noise reduction in Lightroom/Camera Raw is very good as well.

DXO 9.5, however, is on a whole other level (reducing noise while maintaining excellent natural-looking image integrity). The "smart lighting" in DXO is also very helpful in scenarios like this where the lighting is really awful. I also like that DXO 9.5 now works in concert with Lightroom - you can export to DXO within LR, and then send the processed image back to LR from DXO. I don't think I'll be using it for every image, but it is now my go-to app for processing any raw file that poses noise and/or lighting challenges.


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Northwoods ­ Bill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,145 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 413
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jun 23, 2014 09:08 |  #4

Processing was done in LR. Exposure was pulled down .25, Contrast +24, Highlights -10, shadows +3, Whites -2, blacks -14, clarity +7 Sharpening with high pass in PS, 4.3, overlay.


Sharpening in LR was left at default, masking cranked to 87

NR - Also in LR
Luminance: 25
Detail: 36
Contrast:5


Bill R
Web:https://www.flickr.com​/photos/whitebirch/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11004
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Jun 23, 2014 09:27 |  #5

At the 1024px wide screen resolution it is hard to see the issue with the noise - mainly my eyes are drawn (negatively) to the two figures on either side of the frame who are in shadow - they would benefit from an adjustment brush (LR) exposure boost (auto-masking turned on). Also the image in general looks unsharp, but maybe that's just from the low-resolution export.

I would also explore (in LR) taking the highlights all the way down, and the shadows all the way up - and then use contrast to bring back the lost contrast.


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Preeb
Goldmember
Avatar
2,663 posts
Gallery: 150 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1258
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Logan County, CO
     
Jun 23, 2014 10:58 |  #6

Northwoods Bill wrote in post #16989216 (external link)
Processing was done in LR. Exposure was pulled down .25, Contrast +24, Highlights -10, shadows +3, Whites -2, blacks -14, clarity +7 Sharpening with high pass in PS, 4.3, overlay.


Sharpening in LR was left at default, masking cranked to 87

NR - Also in LR
Luminance: 25
Detail: 36
Contrast:5

Is there any reason why you didn't take the NR higher? I've used over 50 many times in Luminance, then played back and forth with NR and Sharpening to find a good balance. You should be looking for a balance that works with the actual use the photo will be put to, rather than pixel peeping just for the sake if it. I'd think that image could be taken to 50 or 60 in NR, then Sharpening tweaked just enough not to bring back the noise. Maybe even some local NR in the areas most needing it with the adjustment brush.


Rick
6D Mark II - EF 17-40 f4 L -- EF 100mm f2.8 L IS Macro -- EF 70-200 f4 L IS w/1.4 II TC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Northwoods ­ Bill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,145 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 413
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jun 23, 2014 13:09 |  #7

I will work on exposure on both the folks on the side as well as pushing the NR up and adjusting sharpening. Thanks for the suggestions.


Bill R
Web:https://www.flickr.com​/photos/whitebirch/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jun 23, 2014 19:26 |  #8

I don't see noise "standing out", but we are not viewing the pic at an enlarged size. You ask whether you are "pixel peeping", well as has been said it depends on how it will be "presented". You likely used a high ISO in shooting this because of the lower light...? If so, some noise is normal. But unless you plan to print this at a size to put up in a gallery, it's probably great without a lot of attention to Noise Reduction. Really, it's up to you!!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Northwoods ­ Bill
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,145 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 413
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jun 23, 2014 22:27 |  #9

The title of this thread should probably be Lesson Learned!!

I spent a good deal of the day worrying about the noise in the print (I am a type A, I will admit it!)

Anyway spent some more time tonight, followed some advice, increased exposure on the altar servers, used a 50% gray set to overlay to reduce the windows a lot and was somewhat pleased.

For the heck of it I decided to print an 8 x 10 and you know what? The print looks pretty darn good!

Boy did I ever learn something today!

Here is the edited version:

IMAGE: https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2923/14490971341_53232a6920_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: https://www.flickr.com …hwoods_photo/14​490971341/  (external link)

Bill R
Web:https://www.flickr.com​/photos/whitebirch/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ Arbogast
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,619 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 11004
Joined Aug 2010
Location: AL | GA Stateline
     
Jun 24, 2014 08:34 |  #10

It's feeling better Bill - I like that the walls/people have been brightened more and I'm glad you're happy with the printed result! :)


David | Flickr (external link)
Sony: α7R II | Sony: 35GM, 12-24GM | Sigma Art: 35 F1.2, 105 Macro | Zeiss Batis: 85, 135 | Zeiss Loxia: 21, 35, 85

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,058 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Noise
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1359 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.