Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 30 Jun 2014 (Monday) 20:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

drones

 
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
Jul 17, 2014 22:42 |  #61

ryanshoots wrote in post #17038665 (external link)
Interesting stuff. In the power lineman scenario I can't imagine drones having enough payload capacity to do what a human in a bucket can.

I grew up out on the prairie where a steady 15 - 20 mph wind was common, can drones used for photography operate in conditions like that?

They're a set of bots really. Some for lifting/hauling cable, and then other 'pole toppers' that climb and clamp to the pole itself.

Drone aircraft can come in all sorts of shapes, sizes, and capabilities. One project that I've had a passing involvement in included a 'flock' of small basketball sized drones that fly upwind of the main drone and basically map the air currents to feed data back and allow for correction in 90km/h gust conditions so a platform can remain stable relative to the ground.

Another neat project I talked with a developer on was what was essentially a super sized paper air plane with a more refined version of the largest model rocket engines you can buy, all strapped together with some basic electronics and sensors. They were designed to be fired into tornadoes... (And therefore designed to be as cheap and safely disposable as possible...)


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Michael
Goldmember
1,015 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 63
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
Jul 18, 2014 05:54 |  #62

ryanshoots wrote in post #17038665 (external link)
I grew up out on the prairie where a steady 15 - 20 mph wind was common, can drones used for photography operate in conditions like that?

It's all vector math. When there is no wind the flight path is whatever direction you point the device. When there is wind the craft is moving in the direction you point it + the direction the air is moving. If the craft is pointed in a direction opposite the direction of the air movement but has a lower forward speed than the air then the craft will move backwards.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
groundloop
Senior Member
995 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jul 18, 2014 07:09 |  #63

J Michael wrote in post #17039225 (external link)
It's all vector math. ......


While your statement is technically correct there's more to it than that. Wind near ground level interacts with trees, buildings, hills, etc. and therefore can be very gusty and unpredictable (in other words the vectors are constantly changing). Landing a light plane in gusty crosswinds can be very interesting, a drone would be affected even more because if it's light weight.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MDJAK
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
24,745 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 204
Joined Nov 2004
Location: New York
     
Jul 18, 2014 07:42 |  #64

I flew mine in strong winds and so long as it had GPS lock, it was quite stable.

What wasn't so stable is the overpriced gimbal's ability to raise and lower the camera. That was not very steady or smooth.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Jul 18, 2014 08:03 |  #65

In real life, you normally get stability by suspending a weight making the inertia dampen movements. And by adding rotating weights to get gyroscopic stabilisation.

But a light quad doesn't like heavy weights, which creates lots of issues. It isn't so easy to create a high-speed control loop operating a number of very quick motors and make it optically stable. Even with a wide-angle lens, our eyes are quite good at spotting small rotations. And also spot small movements if being close enough to some reference object.

And it gets even harder if you want to record sound.


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MrClark7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,562 posts
Likes: 557
Joined Dec 2011
     
Jul 18, 2014 10:12 |  #66

MDJAK wrote in post #17039342 (external link)
I flew mine in strong winds and so long as it had GPS lock, it was quite stable.

What wasn't so stable is the overpriced gimbal's ability to raise and lower the camera. That was not very steady or smooth.

phantom was in a different catagory. most act like this. check the 34 second mark. Im about to do some testing with mine. ill put a video together with it soon.

https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=aVEDj667DOA#​t=34 (external link)


Canon 1Dmark3, 6D, 17/40L, 24/70 L, 70/200 is f4, sigma 50 1.4
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Michael
Goldmember
1,015 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 63
Joined Feb 2010
Location: Atlanta
     
Jul 18, 2014 11:42 |  #67

groundloop wrote in post #17039302 (external link)
... there's more to it than that.

There usually is.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MrClark7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,562 posts
Likes: 557
Joined Dec 2011
     
Jul 19, 2014 21:19 |  #68

a video i put together while testing some new batteries for flight times.

https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=jGOhUt0H3fw (external link)


Canon 1Dmark3, 6D, 17/40L, 24/70 L, 70/200 is f4, sigma 50 1.4
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MDJAK
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
24,745 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 204
Joined Nov 2004
Location: New York
     
Jul 20, 2014 06:31 |  #69

Nice, except why on such a nice drone is the drone getting in the way of the camera so often? On my DJI Vision 2+, that happened very rarely where you'd see a small portion of the landing gear.

Also, do you have FPV? If so, does yours show the drone's distance from you and height?

And how long flight time are you getting? Which battery? Thank you.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MrClark7
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,562 posts
Likes: 557
Joined Dec 2011
     
Jul 20, 2014 19:10 |  #70

MDJAK wrote in post #17043309 (external link)
Nice, except why on such a nice drone is the drone getting in the way of the camera so often? On my DJI Vision 2+, that happened very rarely where you'd see a small portion of the landing gear.

Also, do you have FPV? If so, does yours show the drone's distance from you and height?

And how long flight time are you getting? Which battery? Thank you.

Many reasons for that-

1. the tilt on the gimbal was set a couple of degrees off. very easy fix, just not an issue with a video that is more checking quality of picture and frame rate. I have been testing go pro's in settings 4k, 1080 super wide, 1080 narrow, 1080 60fps, 1080 30fps. all have pros and cons. Also that last flight was checking 4 new sets of batteries and getting flight times.

2. phanton gimbal is directly below center. mine was but now is about 6 inches from center more forward. I might go 8. but you need offeset weight which isnt an issue. there are other cons also.

3. the phantom is notorious for catching skids and props more than any other. check utube videos and the multitude of kits made for phantom to cure this issue.

4. it was in 1080 60fps wide for that whole video. with the five different cameras made by go pro, only one has wide angle option. so a VERY high percentage of videos on utube are normal view. But even with using normal view you will still see phantom owners with that issue.

5. phantom owners couldnt shoot wide as normal gives them fits.

6. a lot of that video is at low altitude which means a higher degree pitch angle for camera, thus catching blades. also i was flying around 35mph. phantom max is 33 not recommended. 550's can get 55's stock. more speed, more pitch, more pitch more camera is facing ground. thus you need to tilt up.

7. fpv system is on order. iosd is needed for airspeed, altitude, range, direction, battery level. all sort of info.

8. if i fly her naked newest battery gave 14 min loaded, if naked would hit 20min. i fly at 8 mins to not run risk of killing batteries. use 5000 4s. and seperate battery for gimal and running l.e.d.s.

you might like the phantom vid, im nowhere near at the trust level to try this yet. https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=e4dCvwIjvo0 (external link)


Canon 1Dmark3, 6D, 17/40L, 24/70 L, 70/200 is f4, sigma 50 1.4
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." (Edmund Burke)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,045 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
drones
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1667 guests, 129 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.