Thoughts on people using a cut off animals head in photos?

This thread is truly awe inspiring.

It inspires me to say, "Awwwww crap!"

As a student of the "human condition" this thread demonstrates to me how things that are very important discussion points to some people are tripe to others.

Another example of "one mans trash is another mans treasure".

I, for one, am interested in seeing all opinions and discussions, trash or not.

I may not participate, if I have nothing to add, but like big brother I am watching.

Brain Mechanic wrote in post #17014635
This is a new one....lets defend an image without having seeing it to attract as much attention as possible. People never cease to impress me.

LMOA...really? So it's okay to condemn a piece of art without seeing it, but the people saying "let's not judge it until we've seen it" are somehow wrong for "defending it" and not seeing it? The only "defense" going on here is saying "let's see it before we judge it." And that is somehow the strange stance to take? Are you SERIOUSLY trying to turn that around and state that people shouldn't state that we should see a work of art before judging it just because of the off chance that it is garbage and not worth defending?

Why not just ignore the images?

AZGeorge wrote in post #17015667
Why not just ignore the images?

Some things can't be unseen (like seeing your parents having sex, when you're a kid).