Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
Thread started 05 Jul 2014 (Saturday) 21:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Mailing prints: Tube or flat?

 
Randy ­ Digby
Member
Avatar
237 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Dallas, Georgia
     
Jul 05, 2014 21:25 |  #1

Which is best for mailing prints up to 11" x 14", a flat mailer or a round tube? Please note good and bad elements of each.


Got a camera, some cheap glass, one nice glass, a PC which doubles as my darkroom and a lot to learn - and having fun learning.
Taking a picture is like planting a memory, it grows more beautiful with time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hikin ­ Mike
Walkin' Like a Penguin Now!
Avatar
6,354 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 354
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Atwater, CA
     
Jul 05, 2014 21:31 |  #2

Flat. I use the same box that I get the prints done. I make sure they are printed right, sign them, and re-box and mail.


Images in the Backcountry (external link)
Canon 5D 17-40 Ճ/4L 300 Ճ/4L IS 70-200 Ճ/4L 50 Ճ/1.8 1.4x TC Օ Kenko Ext. Tubes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
juicedownload
Senior Member
Avatar
374 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Harrisburg, PA
     
Jul 05, 2014 22:59 |  #3

I've never seen a tube used for anything 16x20 or smaller. I think a tube would ruin the photos with a semi permanent paper curve.

Tube is best for a huge print (say larger than 24x36) or a large and long panorama.


Harrisburg Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Picture ­ North ­ Carolina
Gaaaaa! DOH!! Oops!
9,318 posts
Likes: 248
Joined Apr 2006
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 06, 2014 08:58 |  #4

I mailed a batch of prints in a 10" x 13" envelope yesterday for $1.82. First class.

And whether smaller in a flat, or larger in a tube, USPS over UPS or FedEx. Much lower cost and it allows you to make shipping and handling as an additional profit center.


Website (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
1000WordsPhotography
Senior Member
525 posts
Likes: 141
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 06, 2014 11:43 |  #5

I use a tube for 11x17 and larger. Everything else I put in an envelope. And I prefer USPS as the person above me states but there is nothing about UPS or FedEx that stops you from making a profit if you price shipping and handling appropriately.


Twitter: @1kWordsPhotog
Instagram: @1000WordsPhotographer
Facebook: Here (external link)
Portfolio: Here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Randy ­ Digby
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
237 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Dallas, Georgia
     
Jul 06, 2014 16:05 |  #6

Good comments...thanks to all.


Got a camera, some cheap glass, one nice glass, a PC which doubles as my darkroom and a lot to learn - and having fun learning.
Taking a picture is like planting a memory, it grows more beautiful with time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SuffolkGal
Senior Member
437 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jun 2012
     
Jul 06, 2014 16:25 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

I usually use heavy cardboard reinforced envelopes.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rgs
Goldmember
Avatar
2,430 posts
Gallery: 176 photos
Likes: 1435
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Oklahoma City
     
Jul 08, 2014 16:44 |  #8

Flat. Tubes only for larger photos.


Canon 7d MkII, Canon 50D, Pentax 67, Canon 30D, Baker Custom 4x5, Canon EF 24-104mm f4, Canon EF 100mm f2.8 Macro, Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC

The Singular Image (external link)Richard Smith Photography (external link)
Richard Smith Real Estate Photography (external link)500PX (external link)
Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digirebelva
Goldmember
Avatar
3,999 posts
Gallery: 376 photos
Likes: 1687
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Virginia
     
Jul 08, 2014 20:04 as a reply to  @ rgs's post |  #9

If you have never messed with rolled prints, I would mail them flat if its to a client. I always hate getting my panos rolled from printer..


EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.

When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away
Website (external link) | Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JJD.Photography
Goldmember
1,484 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 113
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Puerto Rico
     
Sep 17, 2014 14:34 as a reply to  @ digirebelva's post |  #10

I'm not finding any reinforced envelopes that are large enough for 12" X 18" photographs. Is the permanent curve and higher cost the only downfall to mailing in a tube? I wouldn't think the curve should matter since the photographs would be framed. There are 15" X 3" tubes on Amazon for about a dollar each.

Thanks for any help finding large reinforced envelopes.


His And Her Photographs (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digirebelva
Goldmember
Avatar
3,999 posts
Gallery: 376 photos
Likes: 1687
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Virginia
     
Sep 17, 2014 16:56 as a reply to  @ JJD.Photography's post |  #11

Use 13x19 envelopes and put cardboard on either side. That's the way I get mine from the printer.


EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.

When it ceases to be fun, it will be time to walk away
Website (external link) | Fine Art America (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Karl ­ Johnston
Cream of the Crop
9,334 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jul 2008
     
Sep 17, 2014 17:13 as a reply to  @ digirebelva's post |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

depends on the type of paper for me

i prefer rolled


Adventurous Photographer, Writer (external link) & Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,118 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1681
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Sep 18, 2014 09:22 |  #13

I recently got some black and white prints done, 16"×12" with an approx 2" border in addition, printed on Ilford traditional silverhalide paper. These came rolled on the outside of a tube 5" diameter tube. This was then packed inside another very sturdy rectangular cardboard box. This was shipped from Germany to the UK, and all for only £9.99 postage, delivered by DHL. The UK lab I use for my normal 16"×12" prints sends them out packed flat. Once unpacked I noticed no difference in flatness between either method.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tom ­ Reichner
"That's what I do."
Avatar
17,611 posts
Gallery: 213 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8356
Joined Dec 2008
Location: from Pennsylvania, USA, now in Washington state, USA, road trip back and forth a lot
     
Sep 18, 2014 23:16 |  #14

Randy Digby wrote in post #17013759 (external link)
Which is best for mailing prints up to 11" x 14", a flat mailer or a round tube? Please note good and bad elements of each.

Flat, of course.
11" by 14" is so small, there is no reason to roll them.


"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,950 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Mailing prints: Tube or flat?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1131 guests, 156 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.