Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 07 Jul 2014 (Monday) 17:51
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Please review the following pictures

 
platforminc
Member
80 posts
Joined Feb 2012
     
Jul 07, 2014 17:51 |  #1

Hi All.

I was by the sea front the other day and I decided to take some pictures and I would like to get some feedback on how I can improve my pictures. Especially as I am looking to do a photoshoot for a friend (pre-wedding shoot).

The pictures were taken with my 50 - 250 Canon lens as I have never really used it. What I wanted to get was to make my subjects pop and also blur out the background. I also learnt that its not about having a very wide aperture, as during my photography courses, the impression that I got was that one should let in as much light as possible into the camera but selecting a very wide/big aperture.

I would like to get tips on how I can improve my composition and also the quality of my shots. The pics were also taken in sunlight by the coast.

Thanks in advance.

IMAGE: http://www.zenet.co.uk/images/IMG_5999.jpg



IMAGE: http://www.zenet.co.uk/images/IMG_6002.jpg



IMAGE: http://www.zenet.co.uk/images/IMG_5980.jpg



IMAGE: http://www.zenet.co.uk/images/IMG_6026.jpg



IMAGE: http://www.zenet.co.uk/images/IMG_6049.jpg

Camera: Canon 500D, f1.8 50mm, kit lens, Tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC, 430EX flash, Remote control,Tripod, Cleaning kit.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
swbkrun
Goldmember
Avatar
1,190 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Likes: 641
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Washington
     
Jul 07, 2014 18:28 |  #2

People will provide a much better expert opinion, but my 1st suggestion is to watch the distractions in the background. It takes away from the pictures... Like the guy laying on the beatch looking like he is doing sit ups. And maybe a a polarizer on there...

My 2 cents... Your taking pictures... Just keep at it. It'll get better everytime...


http://averymckenna.sm​ugmug.com/ (external link)
"When I stand before God @ the end of my life, I would hope that I would not have a single bit of talent left, and I could say, 'I used everything you gave me.'"
Erma Bombeck

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chocolatekara
Senior Member
286 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Oct 2013
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
     
Jul 07, 2014 21:44 |  #3

Hi there!

You say you were trying to get a blurred background, what aperture were you using?
I actually saw this lil article on depth of field yesterday, you might find it helpful
http://digital-photography-school.com …te&utm_campaign​=hootsuite (external link)


Just looking at these, I think you should try spending a little more time thinking about how the background will effect the end photo. Look for simple backgrounds, if there was a part of the beach with no people, or a way you could have positioned your subjects so there were no people, that would have been much better IMO.

Think about the lines the objects are making, that jetty in the first two photos is cutting the photo in half and then you've got all these other busy bits ontop/behind the jetty. and then in the 4th, it's just this black distracting thing in the corner.

Number three is most distracting as you can just see a bunch of people right there, and the intended subjects are actually leaning towards them, drawing your eye to them. Have you heard about leading lines? then there's the guy in the pink and he's walking towards those people, drawing your eye to them even more!

The last photo is the best IMO, the subjects look nicely in focus, they are nicely proportioned in the frame and I really like the composition, the line of the clouds and the hirozen and drawing your eye to the subject, as well as the line of buildings on the right also drawing your eye to the subject. I didn't even notice the man laying down behind them, but you could clone him out as the beach pebbles are fairly consistent. Just watch for "things" popping out of people heads and bodies, branches, poles, other people! etc....
It tells a nice story! However, you haven't really got the "blurred background" effect there >_<


The best thing about your photos are that there are no noticeable shadows on the subjects face. That's brilliant!!! Keep that up :D


_______________
6D - 60D - Canon 135mm 2L - Sigma 50mm F1.4 - Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 - Speedlite 600EX-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
monty28428
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,123 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 253
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Carolina Beach
     
Jul 07, 2014 22:13 |  #4

Guess my limited exif viewer in chrome is not working... it tells me images are anywhere between 17mm f/10 (last one) to 70mm f/8 so not seeing how 'ALL' of these were taken with a 55-250 if it's correct.

Want a blurry background... try setting the 55-250 at the max aperture (smallest f #) it can accomplish and do the tests again i.e. 55mm at f/4 to 250mm at f/5.6 and compare them to what you want to achieve.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jul 08, 2014 00:09 |  #5

She has a nice expression in #s 1 & 5, but I don't think that he likes you in any of them! ; )
IMO you could take a little off the top of all of them.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_311
Checking squirrels nuts
3,761 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 570
Joined Mar 2011
     
Jul 08, 2014 06:27 |  #6

the two methods for blurring a background are wide aperture or using a telephoto having your subject stand close with the background further away.

combining the two will yield stellar results. the 55-250 isnt a great portrait lens since you need to stop it down so far to get it sharp. You are better of using the 50/1.8 you have.


Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
www.michaelalestraphot​ography.com (external link)
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | About me

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jul 10, 2014 08:42 |  #7

mike_311 wrote in post #17018345 (external link)
combining the two will yield stellar results. the 55-250 isnt a great portrait lens since you need to stop it down so far to get it sharp. You are better of using the 50/1.8 you have.

I would agree that using the long end will flatten out the face & look terrible. OTOH, they used to sell "Portrait" lenses that could be adjusted for different degrees of softness, so I wouldn't mark down the 55-250 for that.
The "adjustable built in" softness had the advantage of filling in the shadows from wrinkles on the face, which was much better than trying to soften in the darkroom which had the effect of filling in the highlights.

Keep in mind that, the closer you are to the sweet spot of the lens (2-3X stopped down from max aperture), the less artifacts you will see. So run some tests with it at about 50-70mm at different f-stops & see where you need to be to get the eyes sharp with a pleasant degree of softness in the rest of the image.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,947 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Please review the following pictures
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1349 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.