This post is marked as spam.
SueGirl Member 46 posts Joined Jul 2014 More info | Jul 10, 2014 15:55 | #16 Permanent banSPAM PUT AWAY This post is marked as spam. |
JohnfromPA Cream of the Crop 11,257 posts Likes: 1526 Joined May 2003 Location: Southeast Pennsylvania More info | Jul 10, 2014 17:01 | #17 EverydayGetaway wrote in post #17023509 I get around 600 full RAW shots on these cards... at $10 a pop, they about double in price for double the size too ($20-32gb, $35-64gb) http://www.amazon.com …=8-3&keywords=pny+sd+card They could be free and the OP can't use them in his 40D. He needs CF cards.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigAl007 Cream of the Crop 8,119 posts Gallery: 556 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 1682 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK. More info | Jul 10, 2014 17:41 | #18 You should be able to get around 800 full size RAW images on an 8Gb CF card from a 40D. Canon RAW files seem to be around 1 Mb per megapixel at least in my experience. You should be able to pick up 8Gb CF cards for under $20 each, probably much less than that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 10, 2014 18:17 | #19 John from PA wrote in post #17023630 They could be free and the OP can't use them in his 40D. He needs CF cards. I didn't even realize the 40D had mRAW... Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Jul 10, 2014 18:23 | #20 EverydayGetaway wrote in post #17023781 I didn't even realize the 40D had mRAW... . I'd still just get another memory card or two, aren't RAWs from that camera under 12mp to begin with?The size of the file is relative to resolution, detail of your subject material, and ISO. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 10, 2014 19:00 | #21 TeamSpeed wrote in post #17023790 The size of the file is relative to resolution, detail of your subject material, and ISO. I realize that, but starting off with less MP makes for a smaller file. Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnfromPA Cream of the Crop 11,257 posts Likes: 1526 Joined May 2003 Location: Southeast Pennsylvania More info | Jul 10, 2014 19:08 | #22 EverydayGetaway wrote in post #17023861 I realize that, but starting off with less MP makes for a smaller file. Also, these are on sale... http://www.amazon.com …8-2&keywords=cf+card+16gb Good brand, good price and good source (Transcend).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
whiteflyer Goldmember More info | Jul 11, 2014 02:27 | #23 John from PA wrote in post #17023873 Good brand, good price and good source (Transcend). Agreed, and at well over 1000 raw images on a 32GB card, why carry the extra weight and messing around with external drives.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BigAl007 Cream of the Crop 8,119 posts Gallery: 556 photos Best ofs: 1 Likes: 1682 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK. More info | Jul 11, 2014 05:03 | #24 whiteflyer wrote in post #17024442 Agreed, and at well over 1000 raw images on a 32GB card, why carry the extra weight and messing around with external drives. More like 3000 images on a 32Gb card using a 40D, depending on conditions.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JamesP Goldmember More info | Jul 11, 2014 05:39 | #25 Years ago I had the same question. I shot sRAW on my trip to the UK and have regretted it ever since. I should have just bought a bigger CF card. 1Dx - 5DIII - 40D - Canon 24-70LII, 100L macro, 135L, 16-35L, 70-200 f4 and 100-400L lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
captainkanji Member 119 posts Likes: 14 Joined Dec 2012 Location: S. Illinois More info | Jul 11, 2014 06:48 | #26 I don't understand spending all that money on gear and not shooting in the highest settings. Just get some extra 8 or 16gb cards. I can get around 1300 RAW on a 32gb card (SD), 900ish if shooting Raw + JPEG. I think you should get extra cards and shoot in max settings. I'm not sure how much extra CF cards are, but it's worth it IMO. Canon 6D, EF 135f/2L USM, EF 200mm f/2.8 II USM, EF 50mm f\1.4 USM, EF 40mm f\2.8 STM, 430exII speedlite, Flashbender.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
l7s4 Member 218 posts Likes: 15 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Jul 11, 2014 14:23 | #27 Mark...I'm missing something in your request. I use the same system...I get approx 360 full sized raw images on a 4.7 gb dvd. That's about 12 MB per image. A cd is 700 MB, so I recon you should be able to burn at least 50 on a cd.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wombatHorror Goldmember 1,937 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: NJ More info | Jul 11, 2014 23:26 | #28 mrbass111 wrote in post #17023181 I am headed to Ecuador in a couple of days. I am bringing a laptop to store my photos. (bird photography) but yesterday I was testing out the logistics of getting photos back to my work computer I noticed that I could only get like 20 shots on a cd and I got to thinking I don't want to go thru 100 cd's to transfer all my images. so the question is if I shoot mraw instead of full raw will I regret it? or is there a way I can plug my laptop into my computer and just transfer the full raw direct? I don't want to spend two weeks in Ecuador shooting pics and find out all my stuff is ruined. thanks mark MRAW means semi-fake raw and a lot less reach which must be critical for birds I'd think, I think you'd regret it a lot, most likely
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1423 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||