Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 15 Jul 2014 (Tuesday) 21:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Back to AF 101?

 
quadwing
Goldmember
Avatar
1,029 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 33
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Jul 15, 2014 21:01 |  #1

So, at this point, I'm way too comfortable with my 7D's autofocus system. I'm in the process of getting rid of my 7D for a 5D2, so I'm definitely going to miss the AF system that my 7D had.

Now, this has to do with concepts of autofocus. With a 7D, you can pretty much use any AF point and get an in-focus picture. You don't really need to rely on the center as much I've noticed.

With a 5D2, I imagine, I'd need to rely on the center AF point a lot more. So, it brings me to this question, if I focus using the center point, then reframe, and then take a picture, wouldn't that hypothetically throw my photo a little out of focus because of the distance the camera moved while reframing, albeit only a couple of inches to the left/right/up/down?

Just how decently can the 5D2 focus in comparison with a 7D? I've heard some crappy things about the 5D2 in regards to AF. I mean, I know it doesn't have 932834824 AF points like the 7D, but really, I don't shoot sports, I don't shoot action, and I'd rather have better dynamic range at higher ISO's, better low-light performance in general, and have the full frame advantages over the awesome AF the 7D has. I just need a functional AF that gets the job done without too much of a hassle.

My other camera is a T1i. I survived with its AF for years, and it worked just fine. Then I got the 7D and now I'm spoiled by awesome AF. I wish I could afford the 5D3, but I can't. :P Oh well!! Anyway.

Comments?


Camera gear: Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L II | Lights: Elinchrom Ranger RX Speed AS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Jul 15, 2014 21:16 |  #2

Heya,

Yes, focusing with center point & recomposing always gives the opportunity to slightly miss focus. This is not a big issue though unless you're using really thin depth of field (F1.4, F2, etc).

The 5D2 has the same old AF system as the 5D classic. They're definitely not accurate AF titans by any means compared to what we have today. But that said, all it takes is a little technique with center point focusing and you should be able to do nearly anything short of the most extreme cases of moving subjects.

You're going to be fine. As you said, you don't shoot action.

While you are re-learning how to use center-point AF without any fancy systems like the 7D has, you can start to appreciate the ISO, dynamic range, sharpness, etc, of the full frame sensor to make you feel a little warmer inside.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
quadwing
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,029 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 33
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Jul 15, 2014 21:31 |  #3

MalVeauX wrote in post #17034740 (external link)
Heya,

Yes, focusing with center point & recomposing always gives the opportunity to slightly miss focus. This is not a big issue though unless you're using really thin depth of field (F1.4, F2, etc).

The 5D2 has the same old AF system as the 5D classic. They're definitely not accurate AF titans by any means compared to what we have today. But that said, all it takes is a little technique with center point focusing and you should be able to do nearly anything short of the most extreme cases of moving subjects.

You're going to be fine. As you said, you don't shoot action.

While you are re-learning how to use center-point AF without any fancy systems like the 7D has, you can start to appreciate the ISO, dynamic range, sharpness, etc, of the full frame sensor to make you feel a little warmer inside.

Very best,

Wonderful. That makes me feel better already.

How does the 6D do in comparison?


Camera gear: Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L II | Lights: Elinchrom Ranger RX Speed AS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13371
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Jul 15, 2014 21:35 |  #4

quadwing wrote in post #17034762 (external link)
Wonderful. That makes me feel better already.

How does the 6D do in comparison?

Heya,

The 6D has a little better center point focus, but mostly because it can grab as low as -3 EV compared to other cameras clocking in closer to -2 EV for AF, piercing the dark. The 6D is not a big AF titan either though, it's outer points are not winning any contests. None of these cameras are bad at autofocus mind you, they're just not as robust as the 7D, 5D3, and later 1D series. This isn't an issue since you're not doing action.

That said, I bird with a lowly 650D, not even a 7D, and I seem to be doing fine with a 600mm lens. Just take some time, use good technique, learn your camera, and you can do whatever it is you want to do. You just won't have an auto-system doing it for you with super ease. You will just have to put a little skill to use. No biggie. The trade off is that you now can perform better in low light and you have more control over the thinnest depth of field.

Very best,


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
quadwing
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,029 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 33
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
     
Jul 15, 2014 21:42 as a reply to  @ MalVeauX's post |  #5

Hory chit, -3EV? That's very useful. Definitely going for a 6D if I can.

The AF system isn't super important. Again, it's a convenience to me--that's the extent of it. I'd still rather have full frame.


Camera gear: Canon 5D Mark IV | Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L II | Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L II | Lights: Elinchrom Ranger RX Speed AS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.
Avatar
57,733 posts
Likes: 4065
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Jul 15, 2014 21:51 |  #6

I never found either the 5Dc or the 5DII AF to be inaccurate. It always seemed really accurate, just very slow and brutally slow when tracking moving subjects, especially the 5Dc.


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hiketheplanet
Senior Member
Avatar
666 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 14
Joined May 2013
     
Jul 15, 2014 22:05 as a reply to  @ gjl711's post |  #7

With plenty of light the 6D's outer points work just fine. In low-light, you'll be forced to use the center point. As was said, focus-recompose is not an issue when stopped down, but wide open with paper-thin DOF, you can and will get OOF shots. It is best to use the peripheral AF points if you can.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nick5
Goldmember
Avatar
3,386 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 409
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Philadelphia Suburbs
     
Jul 16, 2014 09:11 |  #8

Quad.
Several years ago I was going to add a 5D Mark II to my 7D. However I could not go back a step with the older AF of the 5D Mark II. Yes I do shoot a lot of sports and BIF, so I was spoiled with the AF of the 7D. For me the only option for full frame with AF of 7D improvements were the 5D Mark III and the 1Dx.
Since Christmas, my 7D's have been seeing less action. Looking to purchase another 5D Mark III as I am now really spoiled. Certainly the best of both worlds.


Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregDunn
Goldmember
Avatar
1,289 posts
Likes: 132
Joined Mar 2013
Location: Indiana
     
Jul 16, 2014 09:55 |  #9

The 5D3 is showing up with some awesome deals lately - under $2500 from reliable dealers via CanonPriceWatch. :)

You will find either the 5D3 or the 6D to be a bit less noisy than the 7D, especially if you tend to underexpose. I expect the 6D should beat the 5D2 autofocus behavior if you're not shooting moving objects.


Canon 1Dx | 5D3 | 7D2 | 6D | 70-200L f/2.8IS | 70-200L f/4 | 24-70L f/2.8 | 24-105L f/4IS | 100-400L f/4.5-5.6IS | 17-55 f/2.8IS | 50 f/1.8 | 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 | 4x Godox AD360

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vengence
Goldmember
2,103 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Mar 2013
     
Jul 16, 2014 10:03 |  #10

quadwing wrote in post #17034788 (external link)
Hory chit, -3EV? That's very useful. Definitely going for a 6D if I can.

The AF system isn't super important. Again, it's a convenience to me--that's the extent of it. I'd still rather have full frame.

Yeah, the -3EV center point is really one of the best parts of the 6D, making it for a few particular uses significantly better than the 5DIII.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidfarina
Goldmember
Avatar
3,352 posts
Gallery: 43 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1028
Joined May 2013
     
Jul 16, 2014 13:47 |  #11

I would take a 6D over a 5Dii. The AF might not be that much better, but while the 5Dii has heavy noise even at 3200 ISO the 6D handles that muuuch better.

And pricewise theyre not that much apart from each other


Sony A7RII | Sony A7S
EF 40 | EF 70-300L | FD 35 Tilt-Shift
FE 16-35 | FE 28 | FE 90
CV 15 4.5 III | CV 40 1.4 MC | Summilux 50 ASPH
Website (external link) | 500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,256 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Back to AF 101?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1452 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.