Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 19 Jul 2014 (Saturday) 03:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Who is an Expert in Image Viewing Software?

 
wayne_eddy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,931 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Perth, 'straya
     
Jul 19, 2014 03:38 |  #1

Hi all,

A few months back I joined my first photography club ever, a club I chose as they are quite renowned for having an intermediate to advanced level of members which suited my own level. I've entered some images each month and have received Gold and Silver nominations on each exhibition night. The judges always tell us that they view the entries in Photoshop rather than an image viewer as PS has great colour management. I agree with that and that's what I do when judging.

On the exhibition nights however, the 30-40 odd members view all the entered images projected on a standard projector screen, that's the best we can afford and all that is really necessary. Most images are seen with accurate colour matching, some are not too bad and a few like mine look terribly off with blues looking too purple, reds/yellows looking very bright and the whole image looking quite alien. Just as reference all submitted images are entered in AdobeRGB profile. Though I process in ProphotoRGB, my images are converted and sent in as AdobeRGB. They look fine in my Lightroom, CS6, even on the Windows Photo Viewer.

A weak link in the clubs set up as I see it is the image viewing software they use (FastStone Image Viewer) which though is "colour managed" (CM turned in settings) doesn't seem do that great a job. I've even tested it at home and my images look as bad at home as on the projected screen at the club. I downloaded Fast Picture Viewer which is also colour managed and my images look spot on (though with possible an acceptably little less contrast).

My home setup is CS6, a wide gamut Dell U2711 monitor calibrated with a Spyder Elite. My CS6 colour settings are as per image below.
Any tips on getting my images to look right on the FastStone Image Viewer or should I be suggesting the club change over to using LR, Fast Picture Viewer or something better but inexpensive?



IMAGE: http://members.iinet.net.au/~damask/Wayne/Photo/forum/canon/colour_setting.jpg


All the images below are the same file which was saved in CS6 as sRGB.

Here is a screen capture comparison of Fast Picture Viewer overlayed on FastStone Image Viewer:

IMAGE: http://members.iinet.net.au/~damask/Wayne/Photo/forum/canon/FastVsFastone.jpg


Below a link to the image:

IMAGE: http://members.iinet.net.au/~damask/Wayne/Photo/forum/canon/Freshwater%20Bay%20Boatsheds.jpg

wayne eddy
[I'm calibrated - are you?]
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jul 19, 2014 04:22 |  #2

It sound like the images might being viewed in sRGB --try converting to that and comparing/Soft Proofing you results?


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wayne_eddy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,931 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Perth, 'straya
     
Jul 19, 2014 04:33 |  #3

tonylong wrote in post #17041304 (external link)
It sound like the images might being viewed in sRGB --try converting to that and comparing/Soft Proofing you results?

Hi Tony, I think I follow you. I converted a couple of test images to sRGB and viewed them in the faststone software and they were still we'll off.


wayne eddy
[I'm calibrated - are you?]
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,740 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 201
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Jul 20, 2014 15:27 |  #4

For viewing with Faststone Image Viewer I' think your images need to be aRGB since you have a wide gamut monitor. I'm not certain if that software is color aware (a quick Google search suggests it isn't), but if that's the cast viewing an sRGB image with it will show oversaturated colors and a ProPhoto RGB image will look way off. aRGB will be the closest match to your wide gamut monitor.

Maybe the following will help. If I have any errors below I'm certain someone will point them out :)

Following is what I use:

  • Web viewing - sRGB
  • Viewing with a normal or wide gamut monitor with proper color managed software - ProPhoto RGB is fine
  • Viewing with a wide gamut monitor with software that isn't color managed - aRGB
  • Viewing with a normal gamut monitor with software that isn't color aware - sRGB


Also, following are applications that are not color managed:
Windows Media Player
Windows Media Center
Adobe Flash Player (playing internet movies, slideshows on sites like Flickr and Zenfolio)
Looks to me that Faststone Image Viewer isn't CM ? ? ?
Windows Desktop for Win 7 and earlier (so choose an aRGB one if you have a wide gamut monitor). For Win 8/8.1 MS forces images you choose to be converted to sRGB which of course displays wrong on a wide gamut monitor.

And these have very poor color management:
Microsoft Office Products
Internet Explorer (a bit better than it used to be, but still not great)

Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 20, 2014 16:48 |  #5

Can you post a link to one of your images, exactly as you sent it in for judging?


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,911 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10102
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Jul 20, 2014 16:56 |  #6

Yeah, it would be helpful to get access to one of your files directly to figure this out.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Jul 20, 2014 17:01 |  #7

OP: Check the calibration software for the Spyder Elite and make sure its set to create ICC v2 Profiles; Windows cannot handle ICC v4 profiles so avoid using them.
Also, what operating system are you using?

Faststone Image Viewer is color managed; go to Settings > CMS to enable it.

Windows Photo Viewer in Windows 7 is also color managed but the implementation is somewhat erratic presumably because it is tied to the older WIM color engine for Vista rather than the newer Windows Imaging Component (WIC) in Windows 7/8:

  • Windows Explorer honors embedded profiles and displays thumbnails correctly
  • Windows Photo Viewer honors embedded profiles in Single Image/Preview mode
  • However, for some odd reason, embedded profiles are ignored in Windows Photo Viewer Slideshow mode

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wayne_eddy
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,931 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 15
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Perth, 'straya
     
Jul 20, 2014 19:13 |  #8

Thanks for posting all.

I'm using Win7 on a PC.

I have updated the OP with a link to a sample image and a screen shot comparison of the same file in both FastStone and Fast Viewer. Both of which are colour managed. The same file is also attached as in image below the screen capture.

FastStone does have colour management if it is turned on in Settings->CM which was conducted when I first started using the software. I have read reports from users who are also unhappy with their images results when viewed with this software, however I have not found anyone who has yet provided comparisons or a study on the matter.

PixelMagic: I will have a look at the Spyder Elite set up tonight. Had a brief look this morning but could not see where the ICC profiles became a selection in the software.

Thanks for your input.


wayne eddy
[I'm calibrated - are you?]
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,488 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Who is an Expert in Image Viewing Software?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
655 guests, 125 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.