Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 23 Jul 2014 (Wednesday) 21:37
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Two Prime Setup for Wedding?

 
bberg
Senior Member
Avatar
407 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Apr 2006
     
Jul 23, 2014 21:37 |  #1

Hey all -

Has anyone shot a wedding utilizing only two prime lenses on two different bodies? I was thinking of attempting 24mm f1.4 and 135L. If I was desperate, I might pull out the 24-120mm for group photos, but I'm thinking I could get by with just the two prime lenses.

Obviously this would require me to be very aware of the framing, but it seems feasible.

What are your thoughts?

Thanks!


Berg | Imagery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Jul 23, 2014 22:18 |  #2

35+50


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tigerkn
Goldmember
4,119 posts
Gallery: 10 photos
Likes: 162
Joined Feb 2009
Location: CA
     
Jul 24, 2014 02:19 |  #3

I know a couple cool Guys here and had shot weddings with them ,they love their 35mm & 85mm.
24 & 135 could be a bit too wide (not much of a problem) and too tight (could be a problem).


Website (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Instagram (external link) | Gears (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Staszek
Goldmember
Avatar
3,606 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
     
Jul 24, 2014 03:12 |  #4

35/135. 85 doesn't focus close enough for tighter crops of details, hands, and facial expeessions for my taste.


SOSKIphoto (external link) | Blog (external link) | Facebook (external link)| Instagram (external link)
Shooting with big noisy cameras and a bag of primes.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 24, 2014 03:59 |  #5

Why would you want to do that? Why would you compromise a couples cover? On a typical wedding day I shoot at the extreme range of all of my lenses, 16-35, 24-70, 70-200, and the 50. Though the extreme ends of the 50 are both 50.

A professional has appropriate equipment and uses it as necessary. Wedding photography is not a hobby or something to be done on the cheap.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
memoriesoftomorrow
Goldmember
3,846 posts
Likes: 293
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jul 24, 2014 04:07 |  #6

You should shoot with whatever lenses and focal lengths suit your style. Be it one or more multiple lenses it doesn't really matter. So long as you have backup kit (if you are being paid) it doesn't matter what you choose to use, be your own photographer with your own style and to hell with what any other photographers think. If what you do works for you and your clients are happy nothing else matters.


Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
john5189
Senior Member
598 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Dec 2008
     
Jul 24, 2014 04:26 |  #7

Something that gives the effective focal length of 24-70 zoom and lots of pixels so you can crop tight later.
A wide fixed focal length risk turning the event into an Imp wedding- big noses. Not cool.

If you do use two lenses make sure they have a body each- changing lenses on digital cameras is risking getting stuff onto the sensor and potentially ruining the rest of that days shooting. Not Cool spending a day per shot rubbing out a hair on each and every image.

You can hire kit quite easily if you dont like the investment in a rarely used $$$£££ lense.


Wedding Photography in Herefordshire.  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Peacefield
Goldmember
Avatar
4,023 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2008
Location: NJ
     
Jul 24, 2014 06:17 |  #8

Like, Tim, I'm all over the place. More than half of my images pass through a 24-70. However, I take a fair amount of shots at 16mm and sometimes even a 10mm FE. On the long end, I'm frequently 200mm on a crop body which essentially translates it into a 320. And I go that wide and long because there's a purpose.

So I can't imagine doing personally doing what you're suggesting. That said, when I do engagement portriat sessions, I go out with a 35 and an 85 coupled with a FF and 1.6 bodies. Swapping the lenses back and forth, that essentially gives me a 35, 50, 85, and 135. But I still wouldn't take that approach for a wedding.


Robert Wayne Photography (external link)

5D3, 5D2, 50D, 350D * 16-35 2.8 II, 24-70 2.8 II, 70-200 2.8 IS II, 100-400 IS, 100 L Macro, 35 1.4, 85 1.2 II, 135 2.0, Tokina 10-17 fish * 580 EX II (3) Stratos triggers * Other Stuff plus a Pelican 1624 to haul it all

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sibil
Cream of the Crop
10,415 posts
Likes: 54444
Joined Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Jul 24, 2014 07:23 |  #9

bberg wrote in post #17052077 (external link)
I was thinking of attempting 24mm f1.4 and 135L. If I was desperate, I might pull out the 24-120mm for group photos, but I'm thinking I could get by with just the two prime lenses.

That sounds risky. Way back when I shot weddings, my primes were; 28, 35, 50, 135




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
memoriesoftomorrow
Goldmember
3,846 posts
Likes: 293
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jul 24, 2014 08:20 |  #10

Sibil wrote in post #17052686 (external link)
That sounds risky.

It is only risky if the OP doesn't have backup lenses.


Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thomas ­ Campbell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,105 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Kingwood, TX
     
Jul 24, 2014 15:23 |  #11

I did 35+135 and 35+85 all the time as a Canon shooter. Now that I am Nikon and the 135 isn't as good, I mainly do 35+85 .


Houston Wedding Photographer (external link)
Houston Sports Photographer (external link)
Current Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
highway0691
Senior Member
Avatar
672 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2006
     
Jul 24, 2014 20:07 |  #12

Wouldn't work for me. I definitely need to go wider & longer.

The 24 - 70L 2.8 II will do all that and nearly as good. The only people that notice the marginal edge primes give are photographers.


There is nothing worse than a sharp image of a fuzzy concept. Ansell Adams

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mclaren777
Goldmember
Avatar
1,482 posts
Likes: 86
Joined May 2012
Location: Olympia, WA
     
Jul 25, 2014 00:36 |  #13

35+85 is easily doable.

Add in a 14mm and you'd be set.


A simple comparison of sensor technology: Nikon vs. Canon (external link)
A technical comparison of sensor technology: Exposure Latitude (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ArisPhoto
Member
Avatar
63 posts
Joined Dec 2012
Location: Finland
     
Jul 25, 2014 03:25 |  #14

Hi Brandon. I think you would get easily by with the 24mm f1.4L II and 135mm f2L -primes, as you have the 24-120 zoom as a backup and for those in between focal lengths. I suggest to get at some point a 50 mm –lens (start with a EF 50 1.4) with those primes and you would be set.

Generally I prefer to shoot weddings, funerals etc. with a zoom combo of 24-70 + 70-200, even though I have the 14+24+50+135 primes. Sometimes I use the primes on those occasions as well. I had the 16-35L, 35L and 85L –lenses, but I did not use them at the church, receptions or for the portraits, so I´m for a 50 mm prime together with the 24 and 135 mm -primes. For me that is a great solution, but it´s not for all. Basically I would say, what everybody else has said, get to know what your style is and go for it.


Ari (external link)
Website (external link) |Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SMP_Homer
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,709 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 541
Joined Mar 2008
Location: London, Ontario
     
Jul 25, 2014 14:34 |  #15

most of the time, I'm 35/85
that's what I prefer to work with, but sometimes the church or venue layout will dictate the need for something different...


EOS R6’ / 1D X / 1D IV (and the wife has a T4i)
Sig35A, Sig50A, Sig85A, Sig14-24A, Sig24-105A, Sig70-200S, Sig150-600C
100-400L, 100L, 100/2, 300 2.8L, 1.4x II / 2x II
600EX-II X3, 430EX-III X3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,521 views & 0 likes for this thread, 16 members have posted to it.
Two Prime Setup for Wedding?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ahmed0essam
1545 guests, 167 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.