Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 26 Jul 2014 (Saturday) 09:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Would a 30" be overkill for editing?

 
Thorrulz
Goldmember
Avatar
3,818 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 469
Joined Jan 2009
Location: The Land of the "Go Big Red!"
     
Jul 26, 2014 09:01 |  #1

I've been looking to upgrade my current 23" ips monitor for awhile and not certain if I should concentrate on picking up a 27" ips monitor or streching the budget for a 30" ips monitor.

The Catleaps look like they could be a good investment but always looking for suggestions from you fellow forum members. Any ideas or suggestions anyone?

I should mention the budget is $400-$800.


Flickr (external link)
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,916 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2262
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Jul 26, 2014 09:12 |  #2

I went with the 30" Dell last fall and haven't looked back. It was that, or a dual monitor set up. More space to have the tool bars, etc.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rimmer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,416 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jul 26, 2014 10:48 |  #3

OMG no. Go big or go home.

Seriously, I upgraded from 23" to 27" last year, and I can already see that a 30" would be very nice to have.


Ace Rimmer -- "What a guy!"
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast." ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dynamitetony
Goldmember
Avatar
1,023 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Sep 2007
Location: london UK
     
Jul 26, 2014 11:06 |  #4

totally agree,, Go BIG :)


5Dmk4 : 5Dmk3: Sigma 24mm F1.4 :Sigma 35mm F1.4 : Canon 50mm F1.4 : Canon 85mm F1.8 : Canon 100mm F2.8 Macro : Canon 24-105 F4 : Canon 70-200 F2.8L mkii : Flashes, lights & Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 26, 2014 11:09 |  #5

Bigger is always better for editing, provided the colors are accurate and its a high resolution panel.

I have two 27" 2560x1440 monitors and still wish for more space when I get a bunch of stuff open.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thorrulz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,818 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 469
Joined Jan 2009
Location: The Land of the "Go Big Red!"
     
Jul 26, 2014 11:22 |  #6

Sounds like I'll be spending a bit more and will be getting the 30" monitor. Going to need to tell the wife a small lie and tell her it's just a 30" television monitor so she doesn't think I spent to much.:lol:


Flickr (external link)
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 26, 2014 11:57 |  #7

Thorrulz wrote in post #17057427 (external link)
Sounds like I'll be spending a bit more and will be getting the 30" monitor. Going to need to tell the wife a small lie and tell her it's just a 30" television monitor so she doesn't think I spent to much.:lol:

Well keep in mind that the 27" and 30" monitors have the same horizontal resolution with the 30" being just 160 pixels taller. For me, that wasn't enough to justify the extra cost and physical space. I'd need a larger increase in resolution to justify an upgrade from my 27's. Two monitors is where its at as far as I'm concerned.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kolor-Pikker
Goldmember
2,790 posts
Likes: 59
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Moscow
     
Jul 26, 2014 12:05 |  #8

Just gonna go ahead and point out that 30" screens are typically worse in some parameters than equivalent 27" models, in doing research for a monitor for myself I learned that the 30" displays have more IPS glow, worse viewing angles, and less uniformity as well. I would probably look at getting a nice 27" model, like the Viewsonic VP2772 or Asus PA279Q, or something similar. Eventually I went for an NEC PA272W, which it seems is still currently $970 at B&H, killer screen if there ever was one.


5DmkII | 24-70 f/2.8L II | Pentax 645Z | 55/2.8 SDM | 120/4 Macro | 150/2.8 IF
I acquired an expensive camera so I can hang out in forums, annoy wedding photographers during formals and look down on P&S users... all the while telling people it's the photographer, not the camera.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jul 26, 2014 14:36 |  #9

I have two monitors at one of my workstations, but my photography workstation has a single 23" monitor and I'm happy with it. The price of a monitor isn't signifcant to me, I could buy a 30", but I find I have to sit back further from it and I turn my neck instead of moving my eyes, so I don't like using them as much.

I say go with the 27", I'm sure you'll be happy with it.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Thorrulz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,818 posts
Gallery: 20 photos
Likes: 469
Joined Jan 2009
Location: The Land of the "Go Big Red!"
     
Jul 26, 2014 14:46 |  #10

Wow, you guys are making it tough to decide. I guess after 27" that you do need to be careful of the quality control aspect as previously mentioned in a prior post.

Special thanks go out to the posters that mentioned some specific monitors in this thread, I'll be looking into them before making a final decision.


Flickr (external link)
D800 I Nikon 200 f2 VR 1 I Nikon 200 f2 ED AI-S I Nikon 135 f2 DC I Nikon 28-70 f/2.8 I Nikon 50 f/1.4G I Nikon 85 f/1.8G I Pentax 645D I SMC FA 645 75 F2.8 I SMC FA 645 45-85 F4.5 I SMC FA 645 200 F4
My sister, the professional baker and cake decorator once told me that my camera takes great pics. My reply was that I thought her oven baked great cakes.:lol:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rimmer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,416 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jul 26, 2014 14:57 |  #11

Some good points here! I must admit to having no experience with a 30", and can say that I'm happy with the look of my calibrated 27". Sounds like some extra issues to consider when going beyond that size.


Ace Rimmer -- "What a guy!"
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast." ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dynamitetony
Goldmember
Avatar
1,023 posts
Likes: 30
Joined Sep 2007
Location: london UK
     
Jul 26, 2014 15:22 |  #12

also admit that i have a 27 and no experience actually using a 30" but i would have thougth i would like to have even bigger and 30 would be perfect.

maybe 27 is the way to go


5Dmk4 : 5Dmk3: Sigma 24mm F1.4 :Sigma 35mm F1.4 : Canon 50mm F1.4 : Canon 85mm F1.8 : Canon 100mm F2.8 Macro : Canon 24-105 F4 : Canon 70-200 F2.8L mkii : Flashes, lights & Stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,998 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
Would a 30" be overkill for editing?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1702 guests, 135 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.