Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 27 Jul 2014 (Sunday) 05:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

128gb and the 5D2

 
RichSoansPhotos
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Jul 27, 2014 05:50 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

I know this is probably a silly question, but I just want confirmation.

Is this card compatible? Since I do movie premieres and keep running out of card space and having to chimp/delete a lot of the time, since this is a fast paced event where you don't get a chance to breathe at most times, or would 32gb be suffice considering it's only uses up at least three cards at most? I shoot in RAW




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 27, 2014 06:05 |  #2

I would go with smaller cards, they are cheaper and if you pin all your hopes on a large card, and it goes bad, you lose everything. Just a personal preference though.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Jul 27, 2014 06:32 |  #3
bannedPermanent ban

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17058773 (external link)
I would go with smaller cards, they are cheaper and if you pin all your hopes on a large card, and it goes bad, you lose everything. Just a personal preference though.


I can't keep changing cards at events that are very fluid in it's nature, though I do have a lot of 8gb cards




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Jul 27, 2014 06:56 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Oh well, just ordered the 32gb for the sake of keeping my mind busy on the photography side




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckless
Goldmember
3,064 posts
Likes: 189
Joined Mar 2012
Location: PEI, Canada
     
Jul 27, 2014 08:39 |  #5

I generally use 32GB cards in my 7D shooting sports, but could normally get away with 16 or even 8GB cards as I swap early. Invest in way more cards than you expect to need, and aim to swap the cards at the first available moment when you notice they're around the 50-75% full mark. This way you always have a spare buffer in your card if you see something happening as you start to swap and have to abort that and return to shooting faster than what finishing the swap would allow.


Canon EOS 7D | EF 28 f/1.8 | EF 85 f/1.8 | EF 70-200 f/4L | EF-S 17-55 | Sigma 150-500
Flickr: Real-Luckless (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 27, 2014 13:58 |  #6

RichSoansPhotos wrote in post #17058798 (external link)
I can't keep changing cards at events that are very fluid in it's nature, though I do have a lot of 8gb cards

Which is more detrimental to your cause, losing 128gb of data, or having to spend 10-20 sec to change a card? Putting a card holder on your camera strap makes it very easy to just open and pull out a card, and putting the other back. There are some very nice small sealed cases that hold 4 cards or more at a time.

What about upgrading to the 5D3? You get 2 slots, which could help.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Jul 27, 2014 14:42 |  #7
bannedPermanent ban

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17059531 (external link)
Which is more detrimental to your cause, losing 128gb of data, or having to spend 10-20 sec to change a card? Putting a card holder on your camera strap makes it very easy to just open and pull out a card, and putting the other back. There are some very nice small sealed cases that hold 4 cards or more at a time.

What about upgrading to the 5D3? You get 2 slots, which could help.


I am budgeting for one at the moment 5D3 that is, but keep hearing rumours that the 5D4 is around the corner (cripes)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Justaddwata
Goldmember
Avatar
1,330 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Stralian - In Rhode IsIand
     
Jul 28, 2014 12:56 |  #8

TeamSpeed wrote in post #17059531 (external link)
Which is more detrimental to your cause, losing 128gb of data, or having to spend 10-20 sec to change a card? Putting a card holder on your camera strap makes it very easy to just open and pull out a card, and putting the other back. There are some very nice small sealed cases that hold 4 cards or more at a time.

What about upgrading to the 5D3? You get 2 slots, which could help.

Where is the greater risk - 1 x 128gb card that never leaves the camera or having the same (or higher corruption) risk (plus the risk of loss) happening with with 8gb, 16gb, and 32Gb cards.

I am an all the eggs in one basket kind of guy ;)


Proudly Australian Made!!
1D MKIII, 5D MkIII gripped, 7D gripped, 40D gripped, Sigma 10-20mm, Sigma 24-70mm f2.8, Sigma 28mm f1.8, Sigma 50mm f1.4, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS,
"Sigmonster" 300-800mm, Canon 70-200mm Mk II IS L, Canon 24-105mm L, Canon 17-40mm L, Canon 35-350mm L, 580 EXII, 430EX, Canon 2X Extender MkII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Jul 28, 2014 14:25 |  #9

Justaddwata wrote in post #17061754 (external link)
Where is the greater risk - 1 x 128gb card that never leaves the camera or having the same (or higher corruption) risk (plus the risk of loss) happening with with 8gb, 16gb, and 32Gb cards.

I am an all the eggs in one basket kind of guy ;)

Ask the wedding and sports guys I guess, but the answer I have seen across the board has been to not put all your eggs into that one basket. The one time you lose the card, you lose EVERYTHING. The one time you lose one of the other cards for one event, you lose part of the event. I don't see a need for a large card, and go with smaller cards like 32gb. Also in 10 years, I have never physically lost a card, I have storage devices that sit on my camera bag strap, and cards either live there, or in the camera. I would hate to report back to our local basketball office that I lost the entire game, or a paying client that I lost their wedding shots. Of course with so much liability on weddings, I wouldn't shoot without a body that had 2 card slots too.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kpritts
Senior Member
Avatar
329 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jul 28, 2014 19:05 as a reply to  @ TeamSpeed's post |  #10

I agree with TeamSpeed. I shoot a lot of sports and normally use either 16gb or 32gb cards in the cameras. My 1D MarkIV is set to simultaneously record RAW on Card 1 and JPG on Card 2 as a backup. I did lose the files on Card 1 and could not recover anything on the card or even have it recognized. Tossed the card but still had the photos on Card 2. I use 128gb cards as storage in my ultrabook but normally stick with the two sizes mentioned above.


KDPritts Photography (http://kdpritts.com (external link))
Canon 1D Mark IV, 60D; Canon EF 16-35L II, 24-70 f2.8L II, 24-105L, 70-200 f2.8L II, 100 f2.8L macro, 100-400L, 300 f2.8L; Canon 1.4x III extender; Travel Kit: EOS M2, 11-22, 18-55, 22, 55-200.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Jul 29, 2014 03:17 |  #11

I'd much rather keep all my eggs in one secure basket, rather than trying to juggle several baskets of eggs.

I've been using CF cards for a dozen years and never, ever, had one fail (well, I did have one; but that was my fault as I removed it from a PDA while it was writing data to it). If I ever did have a problem with data loss I understand that there are several programs that do a good job of data recovery.

I've not lost data through card failure, but I have lost a card along with a load of images. That was in the days when I couldn't get a card large enough for a whole day's shooting (when 64MB was huge). In the heat of the moment I took the old card out and put it somewhere 'safe'. I've also seen a friend turn a strange colour when she realised the card she'd just formatted wasn't an empty one.

For several years I've used a card large enough to hold a whole day's shooting. The only way I can possibly lose it is if I lose the camera. I don't need to keep track of which card is full and which card is ready to be used.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pwm2
"Sorry for being a noob"
Avatar
8,626 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2007
Location: Sweden
     
Jul 29, 2014 03:58 |  #12

Not sure if WiFi-capable cards are possible to use when shooting video, but at least for stills it seems like a decent way to keep down the number of eggs in the basket assuming the user has somewhere to upload the images.


5DMk2 + BG-E6 | 40D + BG-E2N | 350D + BG-E3 + RC-1 | Elan 7E | Minolta Dimage 7U | (Gear thread)
10-22 | 16-35/2.8 L II | 20-35 | 24-105 L IS | 28-135 IS | 40/2.8 | 50/1.8 II | 70-200/2.8 L IS | 100/2.8 L IS | 100-400 L IS | Sigma 18-200DC
Speedlite 420EZ | Speedlite 580EX | EF 1.4x II | EF 2x II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RichSoansPhotos
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
5,981 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Aug 2007
Location: London, UK
     
Jul 29, 2014 04:33 |  #13
bannedPermanent ban

pwm2 wrote in post #17063226 (external link)
Not sure if WiFi-capable cards are possible to use when shooting video, but at least for stills it seems like a decent way to keep down the number of eggs in the basket assuming the user has somewhere to upload the images.

I do have somewhere to upload the photos, it's called 97% of the whole country, hahaha :lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eelnoraa
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
Aug 14, 2014 02:04 |  #14

Yes, 5DIII supports both 128GB CF and 128GB SD


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eelnoraa
Goldmember
1,798 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
     
Aug 14, 2014 02:10 |  #15

Justaddwata wrote in post #17061754 (external link)
Where is the greater risk - 1 x 128gb card that never leaves the camera or having the same (or higher corruption) risk (plus the risk of loss) happening with with 8gb, 16gb, and 32Gb cards.

I am an all the eggs in one basket kind of guy ;)

This is hard question to answer. Let's take 1x 128GB vs 4x 32GB. With 128GB, if it fails, you lost all 128GB. With 32Gb, if one card fails, you lose only 32GB. If the probabiity of failure is same per card regardless of capacity, then 4x 32GB is better.

However, take Lexar for example, 128GB card gets stricter test and screen than 32GB card. So the probability of failure per card isn't the same between 128GB and 32GB. It is hard to say which is better.


5Di, 5Diii, 28, 50, 85, 16-35II, 24-105, 70-200F2.8 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,685 views & 0 likes for this thread, 17 members have posted to it.
128gb and the 5D2
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1472 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.