Bob, FYI....this is the article about start menu replacement:
http://winsupersite.com …ce-start-screen-threshold![]()
KaosImagery Goldmember 1,543 posts Gallery: 31 photos Best ofs: 3 Likes: 1955 Joined Sep 2009 Location: near Saratoga Springs, NY More info | Jul 31, 2014 06:59 | #16 Bob, FYI....this is the article about start menu replacement:
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Check this program out EOS 6d, 7dMKII, Tokina 11-16, Tokina 16-28, Sigma 70-200mm F/2.8, Sigma 17-50 F/2.8, Canon 24-70mm F/2.8L, Canon 70-200 F/2.8L, Mixed Speedlites and other stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drvnbysound Goldmember 3,316 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Jul 31, 2014 09:36 | #18 I'll continue to build my own desktop machines and install W7 until the next "good" version is released. I'll probably skip right over 8 completely. I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
outmywindow Senior Member 672 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jan 2013 More info | Jul 31, 2014 09:44 | #19 Functionality wise I find that Windows 8/8.1 uses less RAM and resources overall than Windows 7 does, and this is on a non-touch laptop that originally came with Windows 7 Home Premium. Its ever so slightly more responsive as well with kernel level refinements over 7 also. Lightroom, Photoshop, and friends run just fine without any difficulties (now using it on 8 for over a year now). Windows 7 is an awesome iteration of windows (well at least as far as windows can be awesome, haha Just a soul with a camera
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 01, 2014 17:51 | #20 cutwater wrote in post #17067768 Bob, FYI....this is the article about start menu replacement: http://winsupersite.com …ce-start-screen-threshold
Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 01, 2014 17:55 | #21 drvnbysound wrote in post #17068037 I'll continue to build my own desktop machines and install W7 until the next "good" version is released. I'll probably skip right over 8 completely. ![]() That's too bad. IMO Win 8.1 is a better OS than Win 7 for everything important (better menu system for Explorer, faster file access, better search) with a couple of minor inconveniences that are easily fixed for three bucks. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drvnbysound Goldmember 3,316 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Aug 02, 2014 00:00 | #22 Bob_A wrote in post #17071008 That's too bad. IMO Win 8.1 is a better OS than Win 7 for everything important (better menu system for Explorer, faster file access, better search) with a couple of minor inconveniences that are easily fixed for three bucks. Possibly, but I'm also running 3 different physical machines. So the cost to upgrade to 8, for what I'd assume are minimal changes isn't worth the cost (to me). I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tiberius Goldmember 2,556 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2008 More info | Aug 02, 2014 03:41 | #23 jaomul wrote in post #17063171 Hi all, Maybe through ignorance I dislike Windows 8. My laptop is about to die and I can get a good deal on a Windows 8 with good spec, 8gb ram, Intel I3 etc. My only option for similar spec in Windows 7 is more expensive, refurbished and I can't get locally. My questions are, I know there are options to make 8 similar to 7. Has anyone here done this?Is this difficult? Is it worth the effort? Thanks I made the move from 7 to 8. Like you, I really hate the metro interface. My photography website!PHOCAL PHOTOGRAPHY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drvnbysound Goldmember 3,316 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Aug 02, 2014 08:26 | #24 Tiberius wrote in post #17071706 I made the move from 7 to 8. Like you, I really hate the metro interface. There are two things you can do to make a Windows 8 machine behave like Windows 7. First, you can set your new laptop to boot directly to the desktop instead of the metro interface. Second, instal a program called "Classic Shell" which gives you back a regular old start menu. I find that my Windows 8 machine now runs in a very similar way to Windows 7, and I am quite happy. That's basically my point above WRT continuing to use W7. There is not much reason (if any) to spend the money on W8, only to have it run similar to W7. I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 02, 2014 10:03 | #25 drvnbysound wrote in post #17071540 Possibly, but I'm also running 3 different physical machines. So the cost to upgrade to 8, for what I'd assume are minimal changes isn't worth the cost (to me). I wouldn't upgrade any exiting machine using 7, but I would use 8.1 for any new build. I have both on my home network, two Win 7 and 2 Win 8 (and 1 old XP laptop) and don't have any issues. Moving between machines using different versions of MS Office is the real pain. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jimewall Goldmember 1,871 posts Likes: 11 Joined May 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | I would not upgrade a Win7 machine to a Win8.1. (But) If I was getting a new machine, I'd go with what it comes with (which should be Win8.1). Thanks for Reading & Good Luck - Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Bob_A Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 02, 2014 16:11 | #27 jimewall wrote in post #17072120 I would not upgrade a Win7 machine to a Win8.1. (But) If I was getting a new machine, I'd go with what it comes with (which should be Win8.1). I have both in my household (plus a WinXP machine that never seems to get used). There are a total four adults and young adults in the household, so each with at least one laptop and then two desktops. I haven't run across anything that Windows 7 did that Windows 8.1 can't also do. The problem is finding it. The Windows interface was dramatically changed in 8, it threw everyone a ton. IMO that's why so many hate it. Because of the huge change there is a bigger learning curve - but it is all there with more. You just have to want to learn it - some don't want to do this. My guess as to the reason for more clicks to get things done is that Win8 was designed more for touch screens. It still works fine for non-touchscreens just more clicks. Once you get used to its interface, it is not really that big of a deal. I also think that if you are buying just an OS Win8 is cheaper than Win7. You can set it up so there's zero additional clicks jimewall. If you were using my system you wouldn't even notice the change going from a Win 7 machine. I only ever see or use metro for my touchscreen Surface Pro 2. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tiberius Goldmember 2,556 posts Likes: 11 Joined Apr 2008 More info | Aug 02, 2014 17:17 | #28 drvnbysound wrote in post #17071906 That's basically my point above WRT continuing to use W7. There is not much reason (if any) to spend the money on W8, only to have it run similar to W7. That's true, but it does mean that if your Win 7 machine is at the end of its life and you need to upgrade, you do not have to look specifically for another Win 7 machine. Given that most new computers today have Win 8, you can still go for one of them and not worry that your experience is going to suffer. My photography website!PHOCAL PHOTOGRAPHY
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jimewall Goldmember 1,871 posts Likes: 11 Joined May 2008 Location: Cleveland, Ohio More info | Aug 02, 2014 20:42 | #29 Bob_A wrote in post #17072485 You can set it up so there's zero additional clicks jimewall. If you were using my system you wouldn't even notice the change going from a Win 7 machine. I only ever see or use metro for my touchscreen Surface Pro 2. Actually I have zero problem with the extra clicks. Now that I know where things are, it is not a problem. Moving from a W8.1 to a W7 and back is not a problem either. Thanks for Reading & Good Luck - Jim
LOG IN TO REPLY |
drvnbysound Goldmember 3,316 posts Likes: 12 Joined Aug 2009 More info | Aug 04, 2014 09:46 | #30 Tiberius wrote in post #17072579 That's true, but it does mean that if your Win 7 machine is at the end of its life and you need to upgrade, you do not have to look specifically for another Win 7 machine. Given that most new computers today have Win 8, you can still go for one of them and not worry that your experience is going to suffer. Microsoft is scheduled to support Windows 7 through 2020. That's quite a life span, which is why I stated that I'd likely skip right over W8. I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 1248 guests, 176 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||