Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 17 Feb 2006 (Friday) 05:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM

 
this thread is locked
nofnof
Member
Avatar
167 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Sep 09, 2009 11:56 |  #2191

EOSBoy wrote in post #7528171 (external link)
Definitely a fun lens!
QUOTED IMAGE


One of the best shots I've ever seen .
Brilliant , stunning , sharp, and wonderful ;)
I wish I would be able to take similar shots with my coming soon 50mm F/1.4 lens and my 1000D/Rebel XS :razz:


Canon EOS 5D MkII
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 US
M
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4
L IS USM
Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Markitos
Goldmember
Avatar
1,615 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC
     
Sep 09, 2009 12:47 |  #2192

nofnof wrote in post #8610815 (external link)
So you used photoshop or something ?

Thanks ;)

Yeah, PS or Lightroom. You can do it in-camera, but then you lose control over how you want to convert it, and you don't have a color version if you want one. Why limit your options if you don't have to?


|Fuji X-E2|Fuji X-E1|Fuji 18 f/2|Fuji 35 f/1.4|Fuji 60 f/2.4 macro|Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4|Fuji 55-200 f/3.5-4.8

http://www.newschoolof​photography.com/forum/ (external link)Where I Hone My Skillz (external link)
Where My "Serious" Stuff Is (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 09, 2009 14:21 |  #2193

One of the cool things about digital photography is that you don't "shoot black and white". This is especially powerful if you shoot and process Raw -- you have a lot of control over processing monochrome images by manipulating color channels, not just basic processing.


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Littlefield
Goldmember
Avatar
2,063 posts
Gallery: 465 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 11248
Joined Jan 2006
Location: SC, USA
     
Sep 09, 2009 17:37 |  #2194

nofnof wrote in post #8610144 (external link)
How do you take black and white photos ? :confused:
Very nice shots ..

Nice B& W shots . He is pretty with his Fruit of the Looms :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Burnaby
Senior Member
Avatar
345 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver, Canada
     
Sep 10, 2009 00:50 |  #2195

Rudi wrote in post #8608187 (external link)
Nope, he means keeping it mounted in the normal (forward) position. The 50/1.4 extends when focusing, just like the 85L. It is a good idea to rack the focus all the way to infinity, to retract the front element, before putting it back in the bag. The hood protects the lens even further (when left mounted).

Thanks mate, I will do this from now on...



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spelunker
Senior Member
Avatar
258 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Sep 10, 2009 01:19 |  #2196

Markitos wrote in post #8612706 (external link)
Yeah, PS or Lightroom. You can do it in-camera, but then you lose control over how you want to convert it, and you don't have a color version if you want one. Why limit your options if you don't have to?


Because not being able to convert it is the entire point. At least to me it is. It will never be as much of a b/w picture if it was simply converted from color. Also, if you're shooting the picture with b/w in mind, you'll likely see contrasts, shadows etc in another way.


flickr (external link) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Markitos
Goldmember
Avatar
1,615 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC
     
Sep 10, 2009 04:43 |  #2197

spelunker wrote in post #8616684 (external link)
Because not being able to convert it is the entire point. At least to me it is. It will never be as much of a b/w picture if it was simply converted from color. Also, if you're shooting the picture with b/w in mind, you'll likely see contrasts, shadows etc in another way.

Well, then go ahead and limit your options. And who said I DON'T shoot with b/w in mind? I would say 60+% of my photography is black and white. This is what works best for me because I have THE MOST CONTROL over how I want to process things in b/w. YMMV. If you want the "purity" of shooting in b/w from beginning to end, you really need to convert your eyes to monochrome, then shoot b+w film. That's probably the best idea, since it has better dynamic range, anyway. ;)

Here are some relevant examples (both b/w and shot with the Canon 50mm f/1.4):

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


If you can explain how these are somehow poorer images for having been shot in color then converted to b/w, I'm all ears. If I never told you they were color to begin with, would you know?

|Fuji X-E2|Fuji X-E1|Fuji 18 f/2|Fuji 35 f/1.4|Fuji 60 f/2.4 macro|Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4|Fuji 55-200 f/3.5-4.8

http://www.newschoolof​photography.com/forum/ (external link)Where I Hone My Skillz (external link)
Where My "Serious" Stuff Is (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nofnof
Member
Avatar
167 posts
Joined Aug 2009
     
Sep 10, 2009 06:44 |  #2198

kristiang wrote in post #8388954 (external link)
Hello everybody:)
My few shots with this lens

4.
QUOTED IMAGE
5.

Perfect shot.
How do you process such wonderful colors ? it's like a comic book :)

Thanks ;)


Canon EOS 5D MkII
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 US
M
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4
L IS USM
Flick (external link)r

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spelunker
Senior Member
Avatar
258 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Sep 10, 2009 10:49 as a reply to  @ Markitos's post |  #2199

If you can explain how these are somehow poorer images for having been shot in color then converted to b/w, I'm all ears. If I never told you they were color to begin with, would you know?


I never said they would be poorer images. You asked why one would limit one's options even if one didn't have to and I explained why. It was not an attack on your photographic discipline, though you certainly seemed to take offense.

What I think is that b/w pictures tend to need a different mindset than color pictures and that point is lost if you just treat them as color-less color pictures instead of accepting them as something else altogether.


flickr (external link) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Markitos
Goldmember
Avatar
1,615 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC
     
Sep 10, 2009 14:48 |  #2200

spelunker wrote in post #8618490 (external link)
I never said they would be poorer images. You asked why one would limit one's options even if one didn't have to and I explained why. It was not an attack on your photographic discipline, though you certainly seemed to take offense.

What I think is that b/w pictures tend to need a different mindset than color pictures and that point is lost if you just treat them as color-less color pictures instead of accepting them as something else altogether.

I didn't take offense, I just wanted to offer another opinion from someone who shoots a lot of black and white, and who is, in fact, known among his peers for his black and whites. You did actually say they would be poorer images, though, just not in those words (see the quote below--I highlighted the part where you said it.)

I certainly don't treat them as color-less color photos, and I tend to "see" how things would look in b/w (part of the reason I shoot it so much), but you wrote:

Because not being able to convert it is the entire point. At least to me it is. It will never be as much of a b/w picture if it was simply converted from color. Also, if you're shooting the picture with b/w in mind, you'll likely see contrasts, shadows etc in another way.

And I disagree with that. I don't really see how looking at a scene, composing your photo, and taking the photo with your 5D is any different than with your EOS-3 loaded with T-max. You're still seeing the scene in color, whatever your intent, and whatever the media it's being recorded to. I don't see why it matters at all whether you want to convert it in the camera or in PP. I don't see how it makes it any "less" when you convert it in LR rather than letting the camera do it.

I'm not offended, I just disagree, and because it's a topic I'm fairly close to, I chose to illustrate a different perspective.


|Fuji X-E2|Fuji X-E1|Fuji 18 f/2|Fuji 35 f/1.4|Fuji 60 f/2.4 macro|Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4|Fuji 55-200 f/3.5-4.8

http://www.newschoolof​photography.com/forum/ (external link)Where I Hone My Skillz (external link)
Where My "Serious" Stuff Is (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joosay
Goldmember
Avatar
1,325 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: City so nice they named it twice
     
Sep 10, 2009 16:13 |  #2201

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Flickr (external link) - Angelito Jusay Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
spelunker
Senior Member
Avatar
258 posts
Joined Jul 2008
     
Sep 10, 2009 18:23 |  #2202

Markitos wrote in post #8619919 (external link)
I don't see why it matters at all whether you want to convert it in the camera or in PP. I don't see how it makes it any "less" when you convert it in LR rather than letting the camera do it.

I don't know. It just does. It's a bit hard to explain if you don't agree with it. Certainly your way is more practical, since you can have both color and b/w versions of the same picture.

I mean, it's not like I don't do conversions in PP either. But if b/w is my vision, then I appreciate the control and restriction of keeping it that way, all the way.

Sorry for hi-jacking the thread everybody. I like your flower picture joosay.


flickr (external link) (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlueTsunami
Goldmember
Avatar
1,021 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Sep 12, 2009 03:14 |  #2203

The 50mm is versatile! Here's a 50 image Pano/Mosaic I did with my 50/1.4 Wide Open...

IMAGE: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3426/3911007839_bfc9f354fe_o.jpg

*obvious post processing in the trees but that aside, I dig the normal perspective of the 50mm focal length and the increased Field of View. Makes for an interesting combination.

Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joosay
Goldmember
Avatar
1,325 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: City so nice they named it twice
     
Sep 12, 2009 07:20 |  #2204

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Flickr (external link) - Angelito Jusay Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BlueTsunami
Goldmember
Avatar
1,021 posts
Joined Sep 2008
     
Sep 13, 2009 06:09 |  #2205

Another "Mosaic" with this lens (you 50mm shooters will probably notice the dramatic increase in Field of View. This was shot with my Canon 350D)...

http://farm3.static.fl​ickr.com …14509581_9672de​60f2_o.jpg (external link)


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,957,206 views & 6 likes for this thread, 1733 members have posted to it and it is followed by 13 members.
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1213 guests, 124 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.