got mine today!!!!! i'll post up a couple soon. been shooting more film with it then i have digital so we'll see
orena Senior Member 544 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2009 Location: eilat, israel/ chicago More info | Sep 08, 2011 19:24 | #6676 got mine today!!!!! i'll post up a couple soon. been shooting more film with it then i have digital so we'll see Always do right, this will gratify some people and astonish the rest.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mjrod1985 Senior Member  498 posts Joined Jun 2011 Location: Honolulu, Hawaii More info | Sep 08, 2011 23:17 | #6677 orena wrote in post #13072633  got mine today!!!!! i'll post up a couple soon. been shooting more film with it then i have digital so we'll see Congrats! You will love this lens... M.J.Rodriguez / Honolulu, Hawaii
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Headshotzx Goldmember  4,488 posts Likes: 141 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Singapore More info | Sep 09, 2011 02:23 | #6678 Thought I'd write a little about this photo:  Classifying Children | Wants Acceptance. by headshotzx, on FlickrI don't usually give long captions and descriptions for my own photos, especially for this project, but I have to for this. You see, I was sitting at the edge of the basement fountain at Ngee Ann City, Singapore, when I spotted this girl. From the first moment I glanced at her, she seemed different. Her actions... her speech... they all pointed towards what we label as "special needs" people. But as I sat from a short distance away, observing her, I realised that she was just like any one of us. She had a loving family who was by her side all the time, just relaxing at the fountain. She ate the same food that they did, and she conversed with them, albeit slowly, but like any one of us would. Sure, she might be different, but at the same time, so are we. So if we can accept each others' seemingly more "normal" differences, why shouldn't we open our arms towards these "special needs" people? After all, they are still human. A curious glance at me. Three frames photographed, one chosen. A connection made, just like with any one else.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 09, 2011 06:37 | #6679 Pick Your side iPhone 4 users  Day 80 of 365 by madyimages, on FlickrBen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Just picked this up from another member here. Pretty impressed so far with this lens. A couple of the first shots I took of this just having fun with the 1.4.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. R6 | R7 | 15-85is | Rokinon 14 2.8 | RF 16 2.8 | 16-35 F4is L | RF 24-105 F4is L | RF 70-200 F4is L | 100-400 II L | Σ150-600 C | 1.4X III | 2X III | 430ex |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
_Ronni_ Member 55 posts Joined Dec 2009 More info | Sep 10, 2011 11:10 | #6681 Just got this lens and quickly noticed CA and fringing in my pics. And unfortunately, I have noticed the same in almost every pic posted in this thread
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Inchpractice Senior Member 788 posts Likes: 6 Joined Nov 2010 Location: Bucks, England, UK. More info | Sep 10, 2011 11:46 | #6682 _Ronni_ wrote in post #13080404 Just got this lens and quickly noticed CA and fringing in my pics. And unfortunately, I have noticed the same in almost every pic posted in this thread  I Think this is a lens that requires you to really plan your exposure to avoid these problems.I may be blind but I've just been through about 5 pages and I can only see one shot with fringing and no CA at all. Groom suits
LOG IN TO REPLY |
_Ronni_ Member 55 posts Joined Dec 2009 More info | Sep 10, 2011 13:02 | #6683 Maybe it's not THAT bad, but I swear - once you start looking for it, you'll see it in most pictures with a highlight. My apologies to the original photographers, but I just picked a few random examples from this thread to point out the problem:     Now, these may be bad examples and influenced by the exposure in general, but I still think I see it way more often than I should. Seems to be especially prevalent in low light conditions, and made worse by high ISO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 10, 2011 16:22 | #6684 _Ronni_ wrote in post #13080755 Maybe it's not THAT bad, but I swear - once you start looking for it, you'll see it in most pictures with a highlight. My apologies to the original photographers, but I just picked a few random examples from this thread to point out the problem: Now, these may be bad examples and influenced by the exposure in general, but I still think I see it way more often than I should. Seems to be especially prevalent in low light conditions, and made worse by high ISO. Its there if you look for them, you didn't mention about the NOISE.... you didn't see them because you didn't look for them. R5, RF 85 f1.2L, RF 50 f1.8, 6D, EF16-35 F4L IS, EF50 f1.4, EF 100 f2.8 L Macro IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 10, 2011 19:02 | #6685  Day 81 of 365 by madyimages, on Flickr Day 82 of 365 by madyimages, on FlickrBen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
WARAT Goldmember  1,190 posts Likes: 139 Joined Jun 2010 Location: Houston, TX More info | Sep 11, 2011 02:17 | #6686
Abby-18 by mikolitz, on Flickr
Abby-19 by mikolitz, on Flickr CANON 5D3 [35 L] [70-200 mm MKII] [50 mm 1.4]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Shotman Member  58 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2010 Location: Madrid, Spain More info | Sep 11, 2011 05:49 | #6687     7D+ 15-85 + CZ 135 + 50 f1.4 + Raynox
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Headshotzx Goldmember 4,488 posts Likes: 141 Joined Dec 2007 Location: Singapore More info | Sep 11, 2011 06:04 | #6688 _Ronni_ wrote in post #13080755 Maybe it's not THAT bad, but I swear - once you start looking for it, you'll see it in most pictures with a highlight. My apologies to the original photographers, but I just picked a few random examples from this thread to point out the problem: Now, these may be bad examples and influenced by the exposure in general, but I still think I see it way more often than I should. Seems to be especially prevalent in low light conditions, and made worse by high ISO. So go make pictures that won't give the viewers any incentive to look for these small mistakes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JonK Goldmember  2,161 posts Likes: 3 Joined Feb 2004 Location: PA USA More info | Sep 11, 2011 10:55 | #6689 This lens gets such a bad wrap. Mine was front focusing just a bit, and at 1.4 that made it look quite a bit off. Simple MA procedure using lens align and its sharp as can be wide open:  IMG_7136.jpg by Jon Kensy, on Flickr IMG_7138.jpg by Jon Kensy, on Flickr7NE | 7D | 5DII | 16-35/2.8L II | 24/1.4L II | TS-E 24/3.5L II | 50/1.4 | 85/1.2L II | 100/2.8L IS | 70-200/2.8L IS II | 400/5.6L | PIXMA Pro 9500 Mark II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 11, 2011 13:31 | #6690 This lens is awesome if you don't PP you can find flaws in all lenses Nikon D850 and a bunch of stuff, I have learned a lot here when I was shooting Canon, staying to keep learning..."Every time I set up I learn something new".
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2435 guests, 104 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
for photographers with taste.
