(@f1.8 )
IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
Cap0ne Senior Member  320 posts Likes: 4 Joined Dec 2006 Location: Bucharest, Romania More info | Jan 02, 2008 05:16 | #676
IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE] 5D Mk2, 16-35 II, 35 1.4, 135 2, 2x 580EX2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop  9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Jan 02, 2008 10:37 | #677 silvex wrote in post #4612879  The bad/soft lens can be fix by a visit to the Canon service center. I sure hope so. The lens is going to Canon this week. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
silvex Cream of the Crop  More info | Jan 02, 2008 11:39 | #678 Tony-S wrote in post #4614470 I sure hope so. The lens is going to Canon this week. Great! Post results after Canon's blessings... .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MRye Junior Member 20 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Beautiful Tucson, AZ More info | Jan 02, 2008 12:55 | #679 Shots like this are why I got the 1.4...  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Jan 02, 2008 13:05 | #680 That looks soft to me. Can you post a 100% crop of the focal point? "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MRye Junior Member 20 posts Joined Dec 2007 Location: Beautiful Tucson, AZ More info | Jan 02, 2008 13:12 | #681 Hello Tony..I guess you're talking to me..give me a few minutes to pull it up in Elements...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Jan 02, 2008 13:44 | #682 MRye wrote in post #4615743 100% from unedited original...ISO 1600..artifacts..and you're right, it is a bit soft Also..double checked the data, and this is actually f1.6 1/60 It's probably the 1600. Mine is noticeably sharper at f/1.8, but not exceptional until f/2. I am hopeful Canon can fix it. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jan 02, 2008 20:01 | #683 sandytrail wrote in post #4616695 Well I thought I should post some pics seeing as I found this forum very useful when I was choosing a lens!!! The 50mm f/1.4 is fantastic! Here are 2 photos taken with it in China, the first taken at f/2.8 and the second at f/1.4. Spectacular! 5D Mark III | 135L | 24-70L | 580EXII | Flickr | Instagram
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Proctorr Member 185 posts Joined Nov 2006 More info | Jan 02, 2008 20:08 | #684 Tony-S wrote in post #4598729 Gee, Einstein, thanks for the tip. Now go back and review the thread - you'll see many shots are not at f/1.4. Oh, and your copy of the lens looks soft, too. Have you ever tried not being an *******? 1D Mark II | 70-200mm F2.8L | 17-40mm F4.0L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony-S Cream of the Crop 9,911 posts Likes: 209 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA More info | Jan 02, 2008 20:34 | #686 Proctorr wrote in post #4618637 Have you ever tried not being an *******? Let's see, how did it start? Oh, yeah, I remember: Perhaps you should pay more attention to the thread before making such asinine comments. "Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S-S frustrating simple something  8,755 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2006 More info | Jan 02, 2008 21:33 | #687 aridan wrote in post #4618746 Another quick whip at f1.4 ISO 1600, shot straight jpeg with a bit of noise reduction in PS CS3... i love your sig lol
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PhotoInc Member  36 posts Joined Jan 2008 Location: FLA More info | Jan 02, 2008 23:17 | #688 Here are a couple ISO 400 WFO  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grimes Goldmember 1,323 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2006 More info | Jan 02, 2008 23:33 | #689 wow, the shot with the doctor is amazing! Alex
LOG IN TO REPLY |
VSV Member 121 posts Joined Jan 2007 More info | Jan 02, 2008 23:38 | #690 Was the doctor shot posed? If it was it looks very natural. “Be the change you want to see in the world.”
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1802 guests, 120 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
