Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 02 Aug 2014 (Saturday) 13:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Big Difference with X-Rite Dual Illuminant Profile

 
Canon_Shoe
Goldmember
Avatar
1,311 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 550
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Kihei, HI
     
Aug 02, 2014 13:41 |  #1

So after years of frustration with all of the camera profiles provided in LR and ACR and the inaccuracy I always felt was there with my camera, I decided to buy an x-rite color checker passport and make my own custom profile. The image below is the same White Balance, same settings all the way through except the image on the left the "Adobe Standard" profile and the image on the right is my new X-Rite profile. Keep in mind, these images have the same settings and this is clearly an inaccuracy with color rendering of the adobe standard profile and my Canon 5D2. The image on the right is color correct when compared the scene. I think this was money well spent!

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/08/1/LQ_691739.jpg
Image hosted by forum (691739) © Canon_Shoe [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Facebook-- http://www.facebook.co​m/AndrewShoemakerPhoto​graphy (external link)
Website----http://andrewshoemaker​photography.com/ (external link)
Nikon D810, Nikon 14-24, Nikon 24-70 F/2.8 VR, Nikon 70-200 VR II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,634 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2057
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Aug 02, 2014 19:38 |  #2

As a sunset I prefer the left one. I also did a blind taste test and asked my GF which she preferred and it was the left one. I own and use an xrite colour checker passport, but only on things like studio shots where colour accuracy is required. For things like sunsets I think that artistic intent is far more important than colour accuracy.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon_Shoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,311 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 550
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Kihei, HI
     
Aug 03, 2014 14:45 |  #3

Dan Marchant wrote in post #17072763 (external link)
As a sunset I prefer the left one. I also did a blind taste test and asked my GF which she preferred and it was the left one. I own and use an xrite colour checker passport, but only on things like studio shots where colour accuracy is required. For things like sunsets I think that artistic intent is far more important than colour accuracy.

Yes, but I prefer accurate colors first and then artistic afterwards. I have plenty of other ones where the accurate colors are far more preferable. Especially any image with green or blue tones. The adobe standard profile is way out of whack for my 5D2


Facebook-- http://www.facebook.co​m/AndrewShoemakerPhoto​graphy (external link)
Website----http://andrewshoemaker​photography.com/ (external link)
Nikon D810, Nikon 14-24, Nikon 24-70 F/2.8 VR, Nikon 70-200 VR II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Aug 04, 2014 06:14 |  #4

Canon_Shoe wrote in post #17073885 (external link)
Yes, but I prefer accurate colors first and then artistic afterwards.

Yup.

Using a profile that gives accurate colours doesn't mean you can't twiddle to get the best colours. But I always found that using an inaccurate profile made it very difficult if you wanted accurate colours.


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon_Shoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,311 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 550
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Kihei, HI
     
Aug 04, 2014 09:18 |  #5

hollis_f wrote in post #17074930 (external link)
Yup.

Using a profile that gives accurate colours doesn't mean you can't twiddle to get the best colours. But I always found that using an inaccurate profile made it very difficult if you wanted accurate colours.

Exactly! We did this for my friend's 5D3 as well and his was off but not as much as mine. Color rendering is so overlooked! Shooting RAW can make it difficult to take just a regular "photograph" if your colors are off


Facebook-- http://www.facebook.co​m/AndrewShoemakerPhoto​graphy (external link)
Website----http://andrewshoemaker​photography.com/ (external link)
Nikon D810, Nikon 14-24, Nikon 24-70 F/2.8 VR, Nikon 70-200 VR II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Aug 04, 2014 14:37 |  #6

Canon_Shoe wrote in post #17075223 (external link)
Exactly! We did this for my friend's 5D3 as well and his was off but not as much as mine. Color rendering is so overlooked! Shooting RAW can make it difficult to take just a regular "photograph" if your colors are off

Well, you have a number of profiles to choose from, have you tried "Camera Neutral"?

You can find a profile that suits you and make it your "default"!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TerminalCity
Member
237 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 182
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
     
Aug 04, 2014 18:05 |  #7

Canon_Shoe wrote in post #17073885 (external link)
Yes, but I prefer accurate colors first and then artistic afterwards. I have plenty of other ones where the accurate colors are far more preferable. Especially any image with green or blue tones. The adobe standard profile is way out of whack for my 5D2

I recently invested in the CCPP - after buying a light meter I wanted to profile the dynamic range of my 70D, the CCPP lets me do that as well as giving me the option of accurate colour profiles.
Wish I'd bought it sooner - some of the canned profiles were and still will be useful in certain situations but I was quite amazed at the difference the custom profiles made; both in colours and global contrast. Usually does the heavy lifting of the development process for me.

I've made profiles for flash, daylight, cloudy, tungsten and a dual-illuminant profile; I'll create more for a particular condition if I feel the need.

Compared to many here I guess I'm a novice in the photographic stakes but after adding these two tools I'm starting to feel somewhat more in control; I know I have a good exposure before I even click the shutter, I know I have accurate colours (which I usually want, at least to start with). I'm now free to focus on composition.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Canon_Shoe
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,311 posts
Gallery: 26 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 550
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Kihei, HI
     
Aug 04, 2014 19:52 |  #8

tonylong wrote in post #17075918 (external link)
Well, you have a number of profiles to choose from, have you tried "Camera Neutral"?

You can find a profile that suits you and make it your "default"!

Yep I've tried Camera Neutral and it's even off. It was just plain shocking how different the colors were between profiles at the same WB. We did my friends 5D3 and it was also off but not the drastic amount that mine was


Facebook-- http://www.facebook.co​m/AndrewShoemakerPhoto​graphy (external link)
Website----http://andrewshoemaker​photography.com/ (external link)
Nikon D810, Nikon 14-24, Nikon 24-70 F/2.8 VR, Nikon 70-200 VR II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,390 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Big Difference with X-Rite Dual Illuminant Profile
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1148 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.