steve126a Member 125 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2013 Location: Michigan More info | Aug 02, 2014 16:53 | #1 I've shot some weddings before informally for family and friends. At the end of May, I shot my first paid and contracted gig. Below is a small cross-section of the wedding. My wife was my second shooter, and she's become quite the photographer in the last year. I'd appreciate CC.        Canon EOS 5D Mark III | Canon EOS 6D | Canon 85mm ƒ/1.8 | Canon 100mm ƒ/2.8 Macro | Canon 24-70L ƒ/2.8 II | Canon 17-40L ƒ/4 | Canon 70-200LII ƒ/2.8 | Canon 135L ƒ/2| 2 Canon 580EX II's | Canon 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 02, 2014 16:53 | #2        Canon EOS 5D Mark III | Canon EOS 6D | Canon 85mm ƒ/1.8 | Canon 100mm ƒ/2.8 Macro | Canon 24-70L ƒ/2.8 II | Canon 17-40L ƒ/4 | Canon 70-200LII ƒ/2.8 | Canon 135L ƒ/2| 2 Canon 580EX II's | Canon 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 02, 2014 17:28 | #3 very nice set I just dont like your big logo Majid flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Is it that you don't like the design of the logo or the size/placement? Canon EOS 5D Mark III | Canon EOS 6D | Canon 85mm ƒ/1.8 | Canon 100mm ƒ/2.8 Macro | Canon 24-70L ƒ/2.8 II | Canon 17-40L ƒ/4 | Canon 70-200LII ƒ/2.8 | Canon 135L ƒ/2| 2 Canon 580EX II's | Canon 430EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 03, 2014 03:51 | #5 I mean the size is too big IMO maybe because its square , it grabs the eye Majid flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 04, 2014 10:07 | #6 The size of the block could be smaller and a bit less visible. I think your placement is good it is just the first thing the eye grabs. Nothing wrong with it just visually seems obstructive. Make it a bit transparent and a few fonts smaller IMO and it would be just fine. Because to be honest even if they were proofs that you didn't want copied I have seen people remove a watermark with not even as much as a blemish from the center of photos. 1D X MII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 04, 2014 10:49 | #7 Hey Steve, Updated: Nikon D700 || Nikon D700 || Nikon 35 1.8 || Nikon 50 1.8 || Nikon 85 1.8 || Nikkor 70-200 2.8 VRI
LOG IN TO REPLY |
beano Goldmember  4,168 posts Likes: 7 Joined May 2006 Location: Berkshire. UK More info | Aug 04, 2014 10:52 | #8 Lovely set. And I can honestly say the logo doesn't bother me in the slightest, as it's not really part of the image and i can see past it. As if you'd deliver the photos to the clients with the logo on!?! Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wiztek Member 61 posts Joined May 2014 More info | Aug 04, 2014 21:16 | #9 Logo is too distracting. The processing is inconsistent too - some are over processed, some look under processed. Some backgrounds are distracting and unbalanced (groomsmen shot with the cars)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Eiro Goldmember 1,368 posts Likes: 27 Joined Dec 2009 Location: U.S. More info | Aug 04, 2014 21:35 | #10 Steve, great set. Thumbs up. Try to set the logo for these photo sizes at 110x80px it should settle well. As others have mentioned, the logo jumps at you. You want to make it as less intrusive as possible but still let folks know who did the job. Get out and shoot
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 04, 2014 21:48 | #11 nice job , you caught some different from the normal shots that we see
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kim_kennedy Member 35 posts Joined Feb 2014 More info | Aug 06, 2014 04:43 | #12 Every pic seems to be just gorgeous. Beautifully captured the entire wedding. Loved it!! Wedding Photographers in Auckland
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is johntmyers418 1248 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
