I can certainly play with the amount. I chose those levels based on the adobe guide.
The one with the adobe guide is not that bad, I kind of like it too except that the head is over sharpen I think. But it looks good from below the head.
Peter2516 Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 05, 2014 22:32 | #16 WhidbeyHiker wrote in post #17079013 I can certainly play with the amount. I chose those levels based on the adobe guide. The one with the adobe guide is not that bad, I kind of like it too except that the head is over sharpen I think. But it looks good from below the head. Peter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 05, 2014 22:42 | #17 Thanks Peter, this was taken at Ala Spit, just north of the Skagit Delta, North Fork. A lot of Ospreys out here too though much harder to capture.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 06, 2014 15:32 | #18 About as good as I have seen,great shots. The above was written as part of an attempt to waste time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
A1original Goldmember More info | Aug 06, 2014 15:45 | #19 For me ANY eagle is a good shot. Like them all. Canon EOS R3| Canon RF 24-105L| RF 70-200 Lf/2.8| RF 50| RF 24-240| RF 100-400| RF 800 and a bunch of Canon L lenses
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mag-1981 Senior Member More info | Aug 06, 2014 16:44 | #20 Personally, I prefer the original version over the sharpened one. Great shots, all of them. I think with wildlife and birds in particular, we are not that bothered about the sharpness. We all know how hard it is just to get a shot and yours are excellent.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
legoman_iac Senior Member 308 posts Likes: 50 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Sydney More info | Aug 07, 2014 18:56 | #21 Hey guys ... Don't get me wrong, these are great pics. Just wanted to mention the unsharp mask thinking it could help a little. I concur that the unsharp settings may be a touch heavy. Perhaps layer the sharpened version over the original and selectively erase the harsh bits and the background, no need to sharpen the beautiful bokeh/dof. My main distraction is still the tree which is a bit fuzzy. If sharpening can't fix it I'd suggest a slight lens blur to clean it up? 2x 50d: with 17-85mm f4-5.6, 100mm Macro USM, 50mm f1.8, 2x Sigma 30mm f1.4, 55-250mm (kit lens), Canon 100-400mm L, Tamron 200-400mm f5.6, Samyang 8mm. 480mm refactor with HEQ5. Home made beamsplitter stereo rig.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 07, 2014 21:48 | #22 legoman_iac wrote in post #17082902 Hey guys ... Don't get me wrong, these are great pics. Just wanted to mention the unsharp mask thinking it could help a little. I concur that the unsharp settings may be a touch heavy. Perhaps layer the sharpened version over the original and selectively erase the harsh bits and the background, no need to sharpen the beautiful bokeh/dof. My main distraction is still the tree which is a bit fuzzy. If sharpening can't fix it I'd suggest a slight lens blur to clean it up? I used an unsharp mask filter, is that not the same thing? Please explain the process a bit for me.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
legoman_iac Senior Member 308 posts Likes: 50 Joined Nov 2009 Location: Sydney More info | Aug 08, 2014 17:37 | #23 Hi WhidbeyHiker, 2x 50d: with 17-85mm f4-5.6, 100mm Macro USM, 50mm f1.8, 2x Sigma 30mm f1.4, 55-250mm (kit lens), Canon 100-400mm L, Tamron 200-400mm f5.6, Samyang 8mm. 480mm refactor with HEQ5. Home made beamsplitter stereo rig.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TedEllis Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 08, 2014 17:42 | #24 I do not think #1 looks soft. I think you redo is over sharpened. My suggestion on #1 is to selectively reduce the highlights on the head and sharpen just a tad. Ted
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2896 guests, 155 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||