Hummingbirds 2 -- Birds in photography-on-the.net forums

Member

41 posts
Likes: 6
Joined May 2014

More info

Aug 11, 2014 18:14 | #1

With no feeder this time!

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/08/2/LQ_692575.jpg

Image hosted by forum (692575) © laxcoachjason [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/08/2/LQ_692576.jpg

Image hosted by forum (692576) © laxcoachjason [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

Canon T3i, 70-200L f4.

LIKES 0

laxcoachjason
THREAD STARTER

Member

41 posts
Likes: 6
Joined May 2014

More info

Aug 11, 2014 18:15 | #2

Sure do look a little different after posting, just need to keep practicing with the uploads.

Canon T3i, 70-200L f4.

LIKES 0

CamFan01

Goldmember

4,623 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Lilburn, GA

More info

Aug 16, 2014 13:27 as a reply to @ bigjohninva's post | #4

Ahhh, you succumbed to the pressure of "the Board" didn't you Jason!
I would agree with most that feeders don't add anything to images of hummers and as such these 2 look much better. I think both images could benefit from removal of some of the noise in the background, but you're definitely trending in the right direction. Keep `em coming!

Steve
1DMk4, 5DMk3, D4s, D800
300 f2.8L IS II, 400 f2.8G ED VR, 500 f4L IS, 600 f4L IS II, 600 f4G ED VR....and a few others.
www.pixallphoto.com

LIKES 0

TedEllis

Cream of the Crop

5,016 posts
Gallery: 101 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 10734
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Southeastern, PA

More info

Aug 16, 2014 16:25 | #5

Jason the image quality has nothing to with uploading.

The first image while bright and clean....most detail is lost

The second, I prefer as it is more accurate of the hummingbird.

Ted
http://www.tedellisphotography.com/
There will be days when you get the shot(s) you missed days, months or years before.

LIKES 0

Lester Wareham

Moderator

32,965 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 46798
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK

More info

Aug 17, 2014 01:41 | #6

Lovely shots Jason.

I agree with Ted's comments, though the second shot could do with being a 1/3 of a stop brighter IMHO as long as you can hold the details.

My Photography Home Page
Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr Flickr Home

LIKES 0

Jump to forum... • Rules • Forums • New posts • RTAT • 'Best of' • Gallery • Gear • Reviews • Member list • Polls • Image rules • Search • Password reset • Home

Not a member yet?

Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

THEME: Paper White | Darker
MARGINS: (this page: defaults)

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1005 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.

	x 1600
	y 1600