Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 13 Aug 2014 (Wednesday) 11:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need better lighting for baby pictures... Will this work?

 
reefvilla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,053 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 153
Joined May 2010
Location: Farmington Missouri
     
Aug 13, 2014 14:25 |  #16

ozzmodan wrote in post #17093977 (external link)
The problem with any continuous lighting is that it doesn't throw nearly as much light as a flash or strobe. You can get a larger light source by throwing a flash through a couple layers of diffusion (such as a softbox or softlighter).

That's why I was wondering about this item. A flash is too much for what I'm wanting. I just need a little more light sometimes.


-----------Canon EOS R -----------

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Aug 13, 2014 14:31 |  #17

For your own baby, open up the blinds and use window light with a simple reflector during the right time of day. Hard to beat that, honestly, without a big octabox.

That LED light will be garbage worse than a pop up flash and blinding light.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Aug 13, 2014 14:45 |  #18

reefvilla wrote in post #17094034 (external link)
That's why I was wondering about this item. A flash is too much for what I'm wanting. I just need a little more light sometimes.

are you using ETTL or Manual flash settings?


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ozzmodan
Senior Member
260 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Aug 13, 2014 14:48 |  #19

reefvilla wrote in post #17094034 (external link)
That's why I was wondering about this item. A flash is too much for what I'm wanting. I just need a little more light sometimes.

Yes, but you can turn a flash way down if you like. You can also use a much bigger modifier to give you a much softer & more wrapping light. The light from a flash isn't harsh or overbearing if properly diffused.

As tkbslc said, if you have access to a large window, that would be the ideal (& free!)


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drvnbysound
Goldmember
3,316 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 13, 2014 14:51 |  #20

reefvilla wrote in post #17094034 (external link)
That's why I was wondering about this item. A flash is too much for what I'm wanting. I just need a little more light sometimes.

1/128th from a Speedlite shouldn't be too much. If anything, I think you'd be at 1/32 or 1/16th... at roughly f/4, 1/200th, ISO 100.

I'll have to toss up some pictures I took later this evening...


I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
..::Gear Listing::.. --==Feedback==--
...A few umbrella brackets I own...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reefvilla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,053 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 153
Joined May 2010
Location: Farmington Missouri
     
Aug 13, 2014 15:09 as a reply to  @ drvnbysound's post |  #21

ETTL..

I'll give it another try and mess around a bit. I have a look in my head I'm going for and I haven't been able to achieve so far.


-----------Canon EOS R -----------

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drvnbysound
Goldmember
3,316 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 13, 2014 15:11 |  #22

Have you dialed in any -FEC?

Are you shooting with your flash on-camera or off-camera?


I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
..::Gear Listing::.. --==Feedback==--
...A few umbrella brackets I own...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Aug 13, 2014 15:15 |  #23

reefvilla wrote in post #17094132 (external link)
ETTL..

go to Manual flash settings and as said above, dial it down to 1/64 (or 1/128 if it goes that low), bounce it off the wall or ceiling and see how much of an effect it has vs no flash. It may not be exactly what you are looking for, but i think you will see that it is pretty low power.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
suecassidy
Goldmember
Avatar
4,102 posts
Likes: 37
Joined May 2007
Location: Huntington Beach California
     
Aug 13, 2014 15:23 |  #24

I think you'd be wasting your money with that LED flash you asked about. I say that for a variety of reasons too cumbersome to list here and I think you'd come to the same conclusion once you have some experience with both flash and natural light under your belt.


Sue Cassidy
GEAR: Canon 1ds, Canon 1d Mark iii, Sony RX 100, Canon 50mmL 1.2, Canon 70-200L 2.8 IS, Canon 100-400L IS, Canon 14mm L, 2.8, . Lighting: Elinchrom Rangers, D-lite 400s, Canon 580/550 flashes. 74 ' Octabank, 27' Rotalux. Editing: Aperture 3

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dave3222
Goldmember
Avatar
1,532 posts
Gallery: 178 photos
Likes: 1016
Joined Jul 2013
     
Aug 13, 2014 15:55 |  #25

This guy knows his stuff.

http://neilvn.com …-flash-and-ambient-light/ (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toolman21
Goldmember
Avatar
1,027 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 7
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Memphis
     
Aug 13, 2014 16:33 |  #26

Any time I have shot my twins it is either natural light with reflectors or I use a 40" brolly box with the speedlight at the lowest setting typically. The large brolly box makes it where they don't even notice the light really.


Toolman21 - Canon 60d & T1i (sold) - Canon 17-55 | Canon 17-85 | Canon 50mm 1.4 | Sigma 10-20 | Canon 55-250
My Flicker (external link) | Like me on Facebook to follow my He-Man 365 nonsense (external link)| www.heman365.com (external link)https://www.facebook.c​om …n-Digital/34796106523515​2 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reefvilla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,053 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 153
Joined May 2010
Location: Farmington Missouri
     
Aug 13, 2014 21:32 |  #27

Sample pics....

Small lamp on the left....

IMAGE: http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d89/reeforbust/2a_zpsf41c5006.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s33.photobucket​.com …a/2a_zpsf41c500​6.jpg.html  (external link)

IMAGE: http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d89/reeforbust/1a_zps8ec132e6.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s33.photobucket​.com …a/1a_zps8ec132e​6.jpg.html  (external link)

IMAGE: http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d89/reeforbust/5_zpsaba2b011.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://s33.photobucket​.com …ia/5_zpsaba2b01​1.jpg.html  (external link)

-----------Canon EOS R -----------

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Aug 13, 2014 21:44 as a reply to  @ reefvilla's post |  #28

woah, you have either a white balance problem or a color profile problem on those first two images. Looks like a white balance issue but it's hard to tell because the embedded EXIF thumbnail looks okay.

you have the flash, go ahead and slap it on the camera and point it over your shoulder to see what happens. Also, zoom in. It will mean the flash is farther away from your kid that might help. I would be using the 70-200 II for dang near every shot i could. The 24-105 is no good for close portraits under 50mm and besides, you have the Sig 35 for that.

cute little bugger.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Aug 14, 2014 13:37 |  #29

I use my Linco Flora for babies. I packs 6 100w equivalent LED bulbs. It is 36" so it provides a large light source. A reflector on the opposite side if needed. But you could use a 60" umbrella for an even larger light source. Babies don't seem to mind constant light, but flash can be upsetting.


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
reefvilla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,053 posts
Gallery: 44 photos
Likes: 153
Joined May 2010
Location: Farmington Missouri
     
Aug 14, 2014 13:52 |  #30

BrickR wrote in post #17096147 (external link)
I use my Linco Flora for babies. I packs 6 100w equivalent LED bulbs. It is 36" so it provides a large light source. A reflector on the opposite side if needed. But you could use a 60" umbrella for an even larger light source. Babies don't seem to mind constant light, but flash can be upsetting.

This all sounds great but I'm just wanting to take some nice candid shots with even lighting, not a full on "session".
I really just need to learn how to use my flash. I'm using an older 430ex ii but I just ordered a 600ex-rt so that will give me some motivation to figure it out.


-----------Canon EOS R -----------

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,584 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Need better lighting for baby pictures... Will this work?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
980 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.