Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 18 Feb 2006 (Saturday) 04:42
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Which version of Noise NInja - 8 bit or 16 bit?

 
Mike ­ Bell
Goldmember
Avatar
2,977 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Perth, Scotland
     
Feb 18, 2006 04:42 |  #1

Sorry if this has been answered before.:o

Despite a search of these forums I can only find lots of posts and tutorials confirming how useful Noise Ninja is and how to use it in a workflow.

None seem to explain which version a relative beginner like me might need - the Home version (8 bit) or the Pro version (16 bit). I have a EOS 350D and wish to take musical performance shots without flash in low light at the maximum ISO of 1600 then work on the RAW images to get as good a result as I can. I have RAW Shooter Essentials, Paint Shop Pro X and Photoshop Elements 2.0.

My budget is limited but I could stretch to buying the Pro version of NN if it is necessary. Is it?


Canon EOS 5DS R EOS 5D Mark III | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM EF 28mm f/1.8 USM EF 85mm F1.4L IS USM EF 85mm f/1.8 USM EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM TS-E 17mm f/4L TS-E 45mm f/2.8 TS-E 24.0mm f/3.5 L II EF 50mm f/1.4 USM | Canon Speedlite 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Feb 18, 2006 05:37 |  #2

I think you'd be fine with the home version. Personally I have the whole big package, but I don't bother to use it - you lose detail and for regular size prints even ISO3200 is fine. Maybe if you read the manual (I didn't) and only did NR on the dark areas that'd be better than doing general NR.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Streetshooter
Senior Member
Avatar
882 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Phila, Pa.
     
Feb 18, 2006 06:34 |  #3

I started with the Home version just to test the program. I did against many other programs and NN definately was easier and better results. If your only making 8 bit images....use the home version....when you move to 16 bit....just upgrade.......I did awhile ago....don


Cheers, Don

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Feb 18, 2006 09:08 |  #4

I started with the home version and then upgraded to the pro version for the batch processing capability. If you're planning on taking large bunches of shots at high ISO, then batch processing will save you hours of time.

The cost to upgrade is identical to the difference between the price of the home vs. pro versions, so there's no risk if you start with the home version and upgrade later.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stevefossimages
Goldmember
Avatar
1,646 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Ely, Minnesota
     
Feb 18, 2006 11:41 as a reply to  @ Curtis N's post |  #5

Mike, if you're shooting RAW, that's a 16-bit image (well, actually 12, but it's what's called 16-bit). If you're making your own prints on a printer capable of using 16-bit color, you should use NN 16-bit. If you shoot RAW but drop to 8-bit color in photoshop while pp to make the file smaller and more manageable, then you should just buy the home version. And if you're shooting JPEG, the pro version of NN is overkill. JPEG is a format limited to 8-bit.


Steve Foss
Quantum in me fuit
For weddings, reunions, workshops, Realty and guided wilderness photo excursions: www.stevefossimages.co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ Bell
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,977 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Perth, Scotland
     
Feb 18, 2006 13:41 |  #6

Thank for all the helpful replies, guys. I'm a lot clearer now.


Canon EOS 5DS R EOS 5D Mark III | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM EF 28mm f/1.8 USM EF 85mm F1.4L IS USM EF 85mm f/1.8 USM EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM TS-E 17mm f/4L TS-E 45mm f/2.8 TS-E 24.0mm f/3.5 L II EF 50mm f/1.4 USM | Canon Speedlite 580EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,816 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
Which version of Noise NInja - 8 bit or 16 bit?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1724 guests, 103 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.