Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 17 Aug 2014 (Sunday) 22:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Astrophotography and white-balance discussion

 
troypiggo
Goldmember
Avatar
4,743 posts
Likes: 172
Joined Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA
     
Aug 17, 2014 22:59 |  #1

I've noticed a couple of threads recently asking about white-balance settings. I realise these are likely for widefield, nightscape type images taken with wide or ultra-wide lenses and DSLRs. In these type of shots, you may have foregrounds that you need to consider for WB, not just the stars.

For interest, I thought I'd post a little about colour calibration of deep sky images - for example taken through telescopes, where you don't really need worry about foregrounds and you're purely looking at stars, nebulae, galaxies etc. The following is not scientific, I'm not an expert. It's just info I've picked up and applied to my images.

Firstly, what is white? The basis of all of our definitions of colour come from sunlight, from our nearest star. Our Sun is a G2V  (external link) type star. So, in our astro images we'd like to see other G2V stars as white.

One method of achieving this involves looking up catalogues and finding a nearby G2V star. It may or may not be in the image you're trying to calibrate. You may have to slew around to some other part of the sky, take and image there, figure out what adjustments to make to get that G2V star white, then apply the same adjustments to your final image.

But it's not that simple. Depending on whether you shoot high in the sky or low on the horizon, the atmosphere plays a part and affects the WB. There are methods of factoring this in, but don't want to go into them here. Just giving a broad overview of considerations.

Another method being adopted by the team at PixInsight (external link), the image processing software I'm currently using, is to colour calibrate the average of all stars in the image as white. They do this by having wavelet routines in the software that detect stars in the image so can apply rules to just stars, as opposed to the background, or nebulae etc. This method works quite well in most cases.

You can turn off the star detection part, and use a region of interest that you can specify. For example a galaxy. They're saying that the average of all stars in a galaxy are white. This also seems to work quite well if the galaxy if a large feature in the image.

Finally - use a colour calibrated monitor. Not point getting all scientific and precise about it if you're not viewing on a calibrated monitor. If you stick by the numbers in your calibration, the image will be right but you won't be able to enjoy the fruits of your labour and it won't look right to you.


"Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic." - Sheldon
Flickr (external link) | Gear List | Macro Rig | Astro Rig | Astro Software Post

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

861 views & 0 likes for this thread.
Astrophotography and white-balance discussion
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1312 guests, 183 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.